Ultrasonic dissection system technology in breast cancer: a case-control study in a large cohort of patients requiring axillary dissection.

In the sentinel node era, axillary dissection (ALND) for breast cancer (BC) is required much less frequently than in the past. However, complications, such as prolonged drainage output and seroma formation, are still observed. Harmonic dissection devices (HDDs) are widely used in laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgery to reduce collateral damage during tissue dissection, but its usefulness in breast surgery is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of HDDs compared to that of conventional dissection in performing ALND. One hundred thirty-nine women (median age 61 years, range 34-71 years) with confirmed pT1-2 primary infiltrating ductal BC undergoing curative surgery were enrolled in the study. The population was prospectively randomized between two age- and stage-matched arms: group A (cases)-68 (48.9 %) patients (HDD technique), versus group B (controls)-71 (51.1 %) patients (conventional technique). In group B, skin flaps were obtained using a scalpel, scissors, and electrocautery which was never used for ALND. In group A, for each operation time, the HDDs were used exclusively. The mean operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and drainage output were (A vs. B) 95 ± 22 versus 109 ± 25 min, 56 ± 12 versus 86 ± 15 mL, and 412 ± 83 versus 456 ± 69 mL, respectively (p < 0.01). Twenty-nine (20.9 %) patients developed an axillary seroma: 9 (13.2 %) and 20 (28.2 %) for groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.030). Our study confirms that in patients with BC requiring ALND the use of HDDs is more time efficient than conventional surgery, and reduces intraoperative bleeding, the amount of drainage, and the risk of seroma formation. These results may lead to several short- and long-term advantages. Thus, a careful evaluation of the cost-benefits of nontraditional tools, such as HDDs, should be performed in all patients undergoing modified radical or partial mastectomy and ALND for BC.

P16 immunostaining and HPV testing in histological specimens from the uterine cervix.

BACKGROUND: The cellular tumor suppressor protein pl61NK4a (p16) has been identified as a biomarker for transforming human papilloma virus (HPV) infections. P16 is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that regulates the cell cycle and cell proliferation by inhibiting cell cycle G1 progression. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To confirm the role of p16 as biomarker for transforming HPV infections and possible clinical applications in histological samples from the uterine cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subject of this study included 56 biopsies of the cervical canal collected from January 2012 to September 2012 in the Institute of Pathology of the University of Sassari. The search for HPV immunohistochemistry was performed with the monoclonal antibody DAKO 1:25, while for the detection of p16 was used CINtecTM p16 (INK4a) histology kit. RESULTS: In 56 biopsies performed in women aged between 23 and 69 years, the authors highlighted, by histological analysis, 24 cases of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) - cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN1) and 31 cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) - CIN2/3); 15 CIN2, 14 CIN3, and two cervical squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCIS). One case was an infiltrating squamous cell carcinoma (ISC). In 24 CIN1, there was a 16.67% positivity for p16 and an equal percentage occurred for HPV. In 15 cases of CIN2 the percentage of positivity for p16 was considerably increased (73.33%), unlike the search for HPV which had a positivity rate of 20%. Finally, in 14 cases of CIN3, and in three carcinomas, the positivity for p16 was equal to 100%, however the search for HPV positivity was between 0% and 7.14%. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that p16 was a highly sensitive marker of cervical dysplasia. The authors have shown that p16 overexpression increased with the severity of cytological abnormalities and that had a greater ability to identify the viral infection compared to the classical immunohistochemical staining for HPV.

Cisplatin-gemcitabine as palliative chemotherapy in advanced squamous vulvar carcinoma: report of two cases.

Vulvar cancer (VC) is a rare disease, usually diagnosed in a stage still amenable to potentially curative treatments, including surgery and/or radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. Several patients however present at diagnosis with metastatic disease and another 30-50% will relapse. Prognosis of metastatic or recurrent disease not amenable to salvage surgery or radiotherapy is very poor. Evidence about the efficacy of chemotherapy in this setting is limited and its role still remains unclear. At present there is no standard treatment for advanced VC and patients are usually treated with schedules adopted for chemoradiation or extrapolated from cervical cancer. We report our experience using a cisplatin-gemcitabine regimen in two cases of metastatic squamous cell VC. No response was obtained with this schedule. No other data are available in the literature about the choice of a cisplatin-gemcitabine regimen in this patient subset. The paucity of evidence about the role of palliative chemotherapy in metastatic VC justifies any effort to implement knowledge. For this reason we think it is notable to also report a negative experience. It is not possible for us to conclude that this chemotherapy would be unable to provide any benefit in a larger sample of patients; nonetheless we think that new agents, rather than combinations of older drugs, could hopefully provide more benefit.

Analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status in endometrial stromal sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESSs) are rare neoplasms, which are currently treated by surgery, whereas effective adjuvant therapies have not yet been established. Recently, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression has been described in ESS, and a potential role of EGFR-targeted adjuvant therapies has been proposed. The aim of this study was to analyze EGFR status in an ESS series and to evaluate their potential role as molecular targets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EGFR status was investigated in a total of ten cases of ESS, which included seven low-grade ESS and three undifferentiated ESS cases. EGFR expression levels were assessed by immunohistochemistry, and gene amplification analysis was performed with dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS: Nine out of ten ESS cases showed positive immunostaining, whereas FISH analysis demonstrated constantly negative results. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that EGFR is frequently overexpressed in ESS. FISH analysis did not show EGFR amplification in any of the tumors, therefore EGFR expression in ESS should be related to different genetic mechanisms.