ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antibiotics have been implicated in the reactivation of exanthema and systemic involvement in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS); however, it is not clear whether these patients become sensitized to the antibiotic. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if, after DRESS, patients become sensitized to antibiotics. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the patch test (PT) data and clinical files of DRESS patients who were administered antibiotics during DRESS from other culprits. RESULTS: Nine patients out of 17 (53%) were positive to antibiotics in PT: six to the penicillin group and three to cephalosporins (including one patient with additional positivity to vancomycin). Considering the eight patients who were negative to antibiotics in PT, seven were exposed to a fluoroquinolone. Four cases were patch tested again and three remained positive to antibiotics 2 to 5 years thereafter. Two patients with positive PT results had an accidental re-exposure to antibiotics and developed a maculopapular exanthema without systemic symptoms. CONCLUSION: Exposure to antibiotics during DRESS or its prodromal phase could enhance sensitization to antibiotics, as confirmed by a positive PT. Reproducibility of positive PTs to antibiotics after several years and reactivation after re-exposure support that T-cell-mediated hypersensitivity to antibiotics in the setting of DRESS is a specific reaction.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/immunology , Cephalosporins/adverse effects , Cephalosporins/immunology , Child , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/immunology , Female , Fluoroquinolones/adverse effects , Fluoroquinolones/immunology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Penicillins/adverse effects , Penicillins/immunology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To measure the perception of quality of life in Venezuelan patients with knee osteoarthritis and to identify those variables that may influence it. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study of 126 mestizo patients with knee osteoarthritis recruited from 8 rheumatology centers in Venezuela. We used a Spanish-translated version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS), as adapted in Venezuela. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the AIMS mean total score among subgroups of knee pain, anatomic stage, and socioeconomic status (SES); a post-hoc test was performed to identify significant intragroup differences. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to examine correlations between age, body mass index (BMI), disease duration, knee pain, and AIMS score. Associations between radiologic stage, SES, and AIMS scores were examined using Spearman's rank correlation. Multiple regression analysis was used to estimate predictor factors of AIMS scores. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between total AIMS scores and knee pain, age, and socioeconomic status, but not with BMI, disease duration, or anatomic stage. Patients with severe knee pain differed from those with mild and moderate pain, and the highest AIMS mean total score was seen in patients within the severe knee pain subset. Patients in the highest socioeconomic levels differed from those within lowest categories. Patients classified as being at the levels of relative and critical poverty showed the highest AIMS scores. Multiple regression analysis showed that knee pain was the only variable that exerted an independent effect on the quality of life in our patients. CONCLUSION: The perception of quality of life is negatively affected by increasing levels of joint pain, old age, and low socioeconomic status in Venezuelan patients with knee osteoarthritis. Our study supports the need for an early and vigorous approach to treat pain in this group of patients.
