The Clinical Research Associate Retention Study: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

Pediatric medicine often struggles to receive adequate research funding for its small, yet vulnerable population of patients. Remarkable discovery in pediatric oncology is credited in large part to the collaborative structure of its research community. The Children's Oncology Group conducts studies supported by the National Cancer Institute. The clinical research associate (CRA) discipline comprises professionals who support administrative duties, regulatory duties, subject management, and data collection at individual research sites. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with CRA retention, as the group continues to have high turnover and position vacancy. A cross-sectional survey design was used to characterize the most frequently cited reasons CRAs gave when considering leaving or staying within their position. Results suggest that low salary, unmanageable workload, lack of career advancement and professional development, and lack of research commitment from the medical team were associated with intent to leave CRA positions. The most frequently cited reasons for staying at their job were the meaningfulness and interest in the work, a supportive principal investigator, and enjoyment working with colleagues. CRAs reported serious but eminently solvable issues that can be addressed using practical and low-cost solutions to improve job satisfaction and retention.

Exploring the attitudes of pediatric oncologists toward the use of laxatives for the prevention of constipation in patients undergoing active treatment: a Canadian perspective.

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common problem in pediatric oncology patients and may lead to significant consequences. There is a paucity of the published literature on the prevention of constipation in this population. The primary purpose of this study was to explore the current practice of pediatric oncologists in preventing constipation in children receiving active chemotherapy treatment, specifically during periods of intensive vincristine therapy. METHODS: A Web-based survey of pediatric oncologists and pediatric oncology trainees in Canadian centers was conducted. RESULTS: A 48% response rate was achieved. The majority of physicians had a lower threshold for defining constipation in oncology patients compared with the published literature. More than 90% of the respondents estimated the prevalence of constipation in pediatric oncology patients to be 30% or higher. The majority of respondents prescribed constipation prophylaxis in the presence of one or more of the following factors: history of constipation prior to or during previous phases of therapy, vincristine combined with either narcotics or immobility, multiple vincristine doses per month, spinal cord compression and immobility, and isolated narcotic therapy. Polyethylene glycol 3350, lactulose, and ducosate were the most commonly recommended first-line prophylactic therapies used. CONCLUSION: Constipation is a significant problem in patients during cancer treatment. Most oncologists suggest giving laxatives as prophylaxis in the presence of risk factors, as well as prompt treatment once any symptoms appear. Our results suggest a role for the introduction of guidelines in the prevention of constipation, especially for patients receiving frequent vincristine therapy.

Experience of adapting and implementing an evidence-based nursing guideline for prevention of diaper dermatitis in a paediatric oncology setting.

BACKGROUND: Diaper dermatitis is one of the most common skin problems in children often caused by irritants that promote skin breakdown, such as moisture and faecal enzymes. It has been estimated that the incidence of diaper dermatitis is as high as 50% in children receiving chemotherapy. The scientific literature suggests a variety of preventative measures, but only a minority are systematically tested and supported by clinical evidence. AIM: The purpose of this paper is to adapt and implement a skincare guideline to better prevent diaper dermatitis in the paediatric oncology population. METHODS: The Knowledge to Action process was used to guide the adaptation and implementation of the new guideline. As part of this process, different tools were used to identify and review selected knowledge (Appraisal of Guidelines Research Evaluation instrument), to tailor and adapt knowledge to the local context (ADAPTE process), to implement interventions (Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario toolkit) and to evaluate outcomes (qualitative analysis). The main outcomes measured included implementation of the guideline and nursing practice change. RESULTS: The guideline was successfully implemented as reported by nurses in focus group sessions and as measured by changes in nursing documentation. CONCLUSION: The implementation of the guideline was successful on the account of the interplay of three core elements: The level and nature of the evidence; the context in which the research was placed; the method in which the process was facilitated.

Retaining nurses and other hospital workers: an intergenerational perspective of the work climate.

PURPOSE: This article describes and compares work climate perceptions and intentions to quit among three generations of hospital workers and nurses. BACKGROUND: Never before in history has the workplace comprised such a span of generations. The current workforce includes three main generations: Baby Boomers (born between 1946 and 1963), Generation X (born between 1964 and 1980), and Generation Y (born between 1981 and 2000). However, very little research has linked turnover among nurses and other healthcare workers to their generational profile. METHOD: A quantitative study with a correlational descriptive design was used. 1,376 hospital workers of the three generations (with 42.1% nurses, 15.6% support staff, 20.1% office employees, and 22.1% health professionals or technicians), employed in a university-affiliated hospital, completed a self-administered questionnaire. They answered the Psychological Climate Questionnaire and a measure of turnover intention. RESULTS: Generation Y hospital workers obtained a significantly lower score on the "Challenge" scale than did Baby Boomers. On the "Absence of Conflict" and "Warmth" scales, the opposite occurred, with Baby Boomers obtaining a significantly lower score than Generation Y respondents. If the nurse job category is taken separately, Generation Y nurses expressed a negative perception of the "Goal Emphasis" scale, compared with Baby Boomers. The proportion of Generation Y nurses who intend to quit is almost three times higher than that of other hospital workers from Generation Y. The main reason given by workers from Generations Y and X who intend to quit the organization is their own career advancement. The main reason given by Baby Boomers who intend to quit is retirement. CONCLUSIONS: Retention strategies that focus on improving the work climate are beneficial to all generations of hospital workers and nurses. If generation-specific retention strategies are developed, these should focus on the three areas identified to have intergenerational differences: challenges, absence of conflict, and warmth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: New nurses will benefit from strategies aimed at supporting their career advancement in the workplace.

Exploring the value of audiotapes for health literacy: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of audiotapes as a health information exchange intervention, specifically looking for use with the "hard-to-reach" population. METHODS: Examined electronic databases and journals for articles that evaluated potential of audiotapes as an educational tool within diverse populations. The systematic review included randomized controlled trials, surveys and exploratory articles. Primary outcome variables analyzed were knowledge and recall, behavioral change, anxiety, self-care, and satisfaction. RESULTS: Audiotapes were used to record consultations and health-related information in specific health situations. No studies were found that targeted the needs of the "hard-to-reach" population. With the exception of positive patient satisfaction, the benefits of audio taped messages remain unclear. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: If even the average person is compromised in the context of information exchange, populations with communication barriers are at even greater risk. Research needs to be conducted, aimed at determining whether audiotapes enhance communication between the "hard-to-reach" population and health professionals.