ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of grade 2 and 3 meningiomas is not well elucidated. Unfortunately, local recurrence rates are high, and guidelines for management of recurrent disease are lacking. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted STORM (Salvage Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Recurrent WHO Grade 2 and 3 Meningiomas), a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients treated with primary SRS for recurrent grade 2 and 3 meningiomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data on patients with recurrent grade 2 and 3 meningioma treated with SRS at first recurrence were retrospectively collected from 8 academic centers in the United States. Patients with multiple lesions at the time of initial diagnosis or more than 2 lesions at the time of first recurrence were excluded from this analysis. Patient demographics and treatment parameters were extracted at time of diagnosis, first recurrence, and second recurrence. Oncologic outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, as well as toxicity outcomes, were reported at the patient level. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2022, 108 patients were identified (94% grade 2, 6.0% grade 3). A total of 106 patients (98%) had upfront surgical resection (60% gross-total resection) with 18% receiving adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Median time to first progression was 2.5 years (IQR, 1.34-4.30). At first recurrence, patients were treated with single or fractionated SRS to a median marginal dose of 16 Gy to a maximum of 2 lesions (87% received single-fraction SRS). The median follow-up time after SRS was 2.6 years. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS was 90%, 75%, and 57%, respectively, after treatment with SRS. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival was 97%, 94%, and 92%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, grade 3 disease (HR, 6.80; 95% CI, 1.61-28.6), male gender (HR, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.47-8.26), and receipt of prior RT (HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.23-5.86) were associated with worse PFS. SRS dose and tumor volume were not correlated with progression. Treatment was well tolerated, with a 3.0% incidence of grade 2+ radiation necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest multicenter study to evaluate salvage SRS in recurrent grade 2 and 3 meningiomas. In this select cohort of patients with primarily grade 2 meningioma with a potentially more favorable natural history of delayed, localized first recurrence amenable to salvage SRS, local control rates and toxicity profiles were favorable, warranting further prospective validation.
ABSTRACT
Mpox virus (MPXV) caused a global outbreak in 2022. Although smallpox vaccines were rapidly deployed to curb spread and disease among those at highest risk, breakthrough disease was noted after complete immunization. Given the threat of additional zoonotic events and the virus's evolving ability to drive human-to-human transmission, there is an urgent need for an MPXV-specific vaccine that confers protection against evolving MPXV strains and related orthopoxviruses. Here, we demonstrate that an mRNA-lipid nanoparticle vaccine encoding a set of four highly conserved MPXV surface proteins involved in virus attachment, entry, and transmission can induce MPXV-specific immunity and heterologous protection against a lethal vaccinia virus (VACV) challenge. Compared with modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), which forms the basis for the current MPXV vaccine, immunization with an mRNA-based MPXV vaccine generated superior neutralizing activity against MPXV and VACV and more efficiently inhibited spread between cells. We also observed greater Fc effector TH1-biased humoral immunity to the four MPXV antigens encoded by the vaccine, as well as to the four VACV homologs. Single MPXV antigen-encoding mRNA vaccines provided partial protection against VACV challenge, whereas multivalent vaccines combining mRNAs encoding two, three, or four MPXV antigens protected against disease-related weight loss and death equal or superior to MVA vaccination. These data demonstrate that an mRNA-based MPXV vaccine confers robust protection against VACV.
