Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(3): e0009154, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33657101

ABSTRACT

Domestic rats are the principal reservoir for urban leptospirosis. However, few studies have identified infestation markers in slums and evaluated their predictivity for leptospirosis risk. We compared households with leptospirosis cases in Salvador, Brazil between 2007 and 2009 and their neighbors using a case control design, surveying for rodent infestation signs and environmental characteristics. With the 2007-2008 data, a conditional logistic regression modeling identified the peridomiciliar presence of rodent burrows (OR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.50-7.26), rat feces (2.86; 1.24-6.59), runs (2.57; 1.06-6.22), households bordering abandoned houses (2.48; 1.04-6.02), and unplastered walls (2.22; 1.02-6.02) as risk factors and developed a predictive score for leptospirosis. With an independent data set from 2009, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis evaluated the prediction score performance, with the area under the curve being 0.70 (95% CI, 0.64-0.76) for score development and 0.71 (0.65-0.79) for validation. Results indicate that high proportions of urban slum households are infested with R. norvegicus. The score performed well when identifying high-risk households within slums. These findings need confirmation in other urban centers, but suggest that community-based screening for rodent infestation can allow to target rodent and environmental control measures in populations at highest risk for leptospirosis.


Subject(s)
Leptospirosis/epidemiology , Rats , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Animals , Brazil/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Disease Reservoirs , Humans , Logistic Models , Poverty Areas , Risk Factors
2.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 13(4): 342-347, 2019 04 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32045379

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 60% of emerging pathogens originate from wild animals, with mammals being the main hosts. Among Didelphis, which are restricted to the Americas, the species Didelphis aurita and Didelphis albiventris are particularly widely distributed throughout Brazil, where they act as hosts for several pathogens transmissible to humans. The reduction of their natural habitat has resulted in the adaptation of these species to human environments. Animals hunting, due to food necessity or cultural habit, may increase pathogen exposure with a potential to zoonotic disease transmission. METHODOLOGY: From November to December 2016, we administered semi-structured questionnaires in a rural community in northeastern Brazil to assess knowledge, practices and perceptions regarding human-didelphis interactions and possible exposure to zoonoses. RESULTS: There were 213 respondents. Based on photographs of D. albiventris and D. aurita, 91.2% and 78% respondents, respectively, identified the animal by the popular name "sariguê", 61% (130/213) believed the animal could convey any disease, 4.7% stated they did not, and 34% did not know. Opossum meat consumption was reported by 20.2% (43/213), of which 58.1% admitted disease transmission possibility. Only 15.9% of respondents had a secondary or higher education level. The distribution of these frequencies is discussed according to the respondents educational level. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal the need to carry out health educational activities, including better community knowledge regarding the possible exposure to pathogens due to marsupial consumption.


Subject(s)
Didelphis/growth & development , Disease Reservoirs , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Environmental Exposure , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Zoonoses/prevention & control , Zoonoses/transmission , Adult , Animals , Brazil , Feeding Behavior , Female , Humans , Male , Rural Population , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 13(11): 1045-1051, 2019 11 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32087077

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The intense urbanization process has resulted in the reduction of forested areas, which poses an additional risk to public health. The aim of this study was to identify environmental variables in an urban community associated with the chances of injuries (bites/scratches) in humans caused by bats. METHODOLOGY: The study community was the Historic Center District of Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. The cases were the official records of households that reported injuries in humans caused by bats along the historical series from 2012 to 2015. Controls were selected from households near the cases without records of injuries involving bats. Univariate analysis was performed for the data using the chi-square and Fisher's exact test. Significant variables (p < 0.05) were included in the logistic regression models. RESULTS: The variable for bats having access to households via defective/broken windows showed an association with the cases in the final model (OR = 45.14, CI = 6.08-335.10). The variables presence of domiciled dogs (OR = 6.04, CI = 1.44-25.92) and exposed fruit (OR = 4.41, CI 95% = 1.15-16.9) were significant factors. CONCLUSION: The results shows that access to the residence and supply of food that can be used by bats are factors that increase the chances of injuries in humans caused by these animals possibly increasing the risk of infectious diseases.


Subject(s)
Chiroptera , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Animals , Brazil/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Chiroptera/physiology , Family Characteristics , Housing , Humans , Logistic Models , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/etiology
4.
Cad Saude Publica ; 33(2): e00132115, 2017 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28300969

ABSTRACT

We analyzed environmental factors that provide food, water and harborage to rodents and the risk of household rodent infestation in a slum community with a high risk of leptospirosis transmission. Detailed environmental surveys were performed in 221 households. Multivariate regression models evaluated the association between rodent infestation and socioeconomic status and environmental attributes obtained from Geographical Information System surveys. The general household infestation rate was 45.9%. Rattus norvegicus signs were the most prevalent, present in 74% of the infested households. The risk for rodent infestation was associated with environmental factors supporting harborage for rats, such as dilapidated fences/walls (OR: 8.95; 95%CI: 2.42-33.12) and households built on an earthen slope (OR: 4.68; 95%CI: 2.23-9.81). An increase of 1 meter from the nearest sewer was associated with a 3% (95%CI: 1%-5%) decrease in the risk of rodent infestation. A lack of sanitation where poor people live provides factors for rat infestation and could the target of educational interventions.


Subject(s)
Leptospirosis/transmission , Poverty Areas , Rats , Animals , Brazil , Humans , Multivariate Analysis , Population Density , Residence Characteristics , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Health
5.
Cad. Saúde Pública (Online) ; 33(2): e00132115, 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-839647

ABSTRACT

Abstract: We analyzed environmental factors that provide food, water and harborage to rodents and the risk of household rodent infestation in a slum community with a high risk of leptospirosis transmission. Detailed environmental surveys were performed in 221 households. Multivariate regression models evaluated the association between rodent infestation and socioeconomic status and environmental attributes obtained from Geographical Information System surveys. The general household infestation rate was 45.9%. Rattus norvegicus signs were the most prevalent, present in 74% of the infested households. The risk for rodent infestation was associated with environmental factors supporting harborage for rats, such as dilapidated fences/walls (OR: 8.95; 95%CI: 2.42-33.12) and households built on an earthen slope (OR: 4.68; 95%CI: 2.23-9.81). An increase of 1 meter from the nearest sewer was associated with a 3% (95%CI: 1%-5%) decrease in the risk of rodent infestation. A lack of sanitation where poor people live provides factors for rat infestation and could the target of educational interventions.


Resumo: O estudo analisou fatores ambientais que facilitam a presença de alimento, água e abrigo para roedores e risco de infestação por roedores numa comunidade com alto risco de transmissão da leptospirose. Foram realizados inquéritos ambientais detalhados em 221 domicílios. Modelos de regressão multivariada avaliaram a associação entre infestação por roedores e nível socioeconômico e atributos ambientais obtidos através de inquéritos com Sistemas de Informação Geográfica. O estudo mostrou uma taxa global de 45,9% de infestação domiciliar. Sinais de Rattus norvegicus eram os mais prevalentes, presentes em 74% dos domicílios infestados. O risco de infestação por roedores esteve associado a fatores ambientais que forneciam abrigo aos ratos, tais como cercas e muros dilapidados (OR: 8,95; IC95%: 2,42-33,12) e domicílios construídos diretamente sobre encostas (OR: 4,68; IC95%: 2,23-9,81). Cada incremento de um metro de distância a partir do esgoto mais próximo esteve associado a uma diminuição de 3% (IC95%: 1%-5%) no risco de infestação por roedores. A falta de saneamento básico nos locais de moradia das famílias pobres facilita a infestação por ratos e é alvo prioritário para intervenções educativas.


Resumen: El estudio analizó factores ambientales que facilitan la presencia de alimento, agua y abrigo para roedores y el riesgo de infestación por roedores en una comunidad sin recursos con alto riesgo de transmisión de la leptospirosis. Se realizaron encuestas ambientales detalladas en 221 domicilios. Los modelos de regresión multivariada evaluaron la asociación entre infestación por roedores, nivel socioeconómico y características ambientales, obtenidos a través de encuestas con Sistemas de Información Geográfica. El estudio mostró una tasa global de un 45,9% de infestación domiciliaria. Los indicios de Rattus norvegicus eran los más prevalentes, presentes en un 74% de los domicilios infestados. El riesgo de infestación por roedores estuvo asociado a factores ambientales que proporcionaban abrigo a las ratas, tales como cercas y muros derruidos (OR: 8,95; IC95%: 2,42-33,12) y domicilios construidos directamente sobre pendientes (OR: 4,68; IC95%: 2,23-9,81). Cada incremento de un metro de distancia, a partir del alcantarillado más próximo, estuvo asociado a una disminución de un 3% (IC95%: 1%-5%) en el riesgo de infestación por roedores. La falta de saneamiento básico en las viviendas de las familias pobres facilita la infestación por ratas y es el objetivo prioritario para intervenciones educativas.


Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Rats , Poverty Areas , Leptospirosis/transmission , Socioeconomic Factors , Brazil , Residence Characteristics , Urban Health , Multivariate Analysis , Risk Factors , Population Density
6.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 8(12): e3338, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25474580

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) is the principal reservoir for leptospirosis in many urban settings. Few studies have identified markers for rat infestation in slum environments while none have evaluated the association between household rat infestation and Leptospira infection in humans or the use of infestation markers as a predictive model to stratify risk for leptospirosis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We enrolled a cohort of 2,003 urban slum residents from Salvador, Brazil in 2004, and followed the cohort during four annual serosurveys to identify serologic evidence for Leptospira infection. In 2007, we performed rodent infestation and environmental surveys of 80 case households, in which resided at least one individual with Leptospira infection, and 109 control households. In the case-control study, signs of rodent infestation were identified in 78% and 42% of the households, respectively. Regression modeling identified the presence of R. norvegicus feces (OR, 4.95; 95% CI, 2.13-11.47), rodent burrows (2.80; 1.06-7.36), access to water (2.79; 1.28-6.09), and un-plastered walls (2.71; 1.21-6.04) as independent risk factors associated with Leptospira infection in a household. We developed a predictive model for infection, based on assigning scores to each of the rodent infestation risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis found that the prediction score produced a good/excellent fit based on an area under the curve of 0.78 (0.71-0.84). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study found that a high proportion of slum households were infested with R. norvegicus and that rat infestation was significantly associated with the risk of Leptospira infection, indicating that high level transmission occurs among slum households. We developed an easily applicable prediction score based on rat infestation markers, which identified households with highest infection risk. The use of the prediction score in community-based screening may therefore be an effective risk stratification strategy for targeting control measures in slum settings of high leptospirosis transmission.


Subject(s)
Leptospirosis/transmission , Rats/parasitology , Animals , Brazil , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Leptospirosis/etiology , Leptospirosis/veterinary , Logistic Models , Poverty Areas , ROC Curve , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...