Solitary fibrous tumor in the retroperitoneum: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is an uncommon mesenchymal tumor that can manifest in a variety of locations, including the retroperitoneum. The most effective standard diagnostic approach and treatment is yet to be determined due to unpredictable behavior of SFT, including retroperitoneal SFT. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old female with a retroperitoneal SFT presented with a palpable mass and symptomatology. Surgical exploration disclosed a tumor encompassing the left renal artery and vein, necessitating left nephrectomy and retroperitoneal mass removal. Initial histological examination suggested rhabdomyosarcoma, but subsequent immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of retroperitoneal SFT. No adjuvant therapy was administered, and there was no detectable mass on follow-up imaging. The patient remained symptom-free. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Retroperitoneal SFTs are difficult to diagnose due to their non-specific morphology, thus immunohistochemistry plays a crucial role in confirming its diagnosis. Surgical excision with negative resection margins continues to be the standard treatment. Recurrence rates are low in comparison to other retroperitoneal sarcomas, hence routine chemotherapy or radiation therapy is not advised. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates the significance of contemplating SFT as the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal tumors and the role of immunohistochemistry in confirming the diagnosis. The optimal management strategies for retroperitoneal SFTs should be determined by additional research.

Renal cell carcinoma not otherwise specified: A case report in Indonesia.

Renal cell carcinoma not otherwise specified (RCC NOS) is a very rare type of kidney cancer which used for renal tumors that do not fit into any of the well-recognized subtypes. We reported a case of RCC NOS of a 64-year-old male presenting an enlarging left flank mass. Abdominal CT showed a left kidney mass infiltrating to the adrenal, with pulmonary metastases. Cytoreductive nephrectomy and lymphadenectomy were performed and diagnosis of RCC NOS was confirmed through histopatological and immunohistochemistry examination.

Malignant solitary fibrous tumor of the penis: A case report of rare malignancy.

Malignant Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare mesenchymal tumor that consists of spindle cell components. The occurrence of SFT in the genitourinary tract is extremely rare. So, there is no clear algorithm for the management of this case. We report A 33-year-old male who complained of recurrent penile swelling in the last 7 months after underwent surgery 3 months earlier. The tumor re-enlarged from the surgical wound's previous sutures. Total penectomy was performed followed by bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy. Perineostomy was performed for urinary diversion. Long-term follow-up after surgery is suggested due to the risk of recurrences and metastasis.

Outcomes of radical cystectomy and bladder preservation treatment for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival outcome of various treatment modalities for organ-confined muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients with Stage II (T2, N0, M0) or Stage III (T3a-T4a, N0, M0) urothelial carcinoma of the bladder treated at the National Referral Hospital and the National Cancer Center of Indonesia from 1995 to 2010 with a minimum follow-up period of 24 months were included in this study. Overall survival and mean survival times were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation age of the patients in this study was 57.15 ± 11.6 years and 88% were men. Over 50% of patients had T2 disease, 24.2% had T3 disease, and 21.5% had T4 disease based on pathology. Based on histological grade, 30.8% were intermediate grade tumors and 42.1% were high-grade tumors. Radical cystectomy was performed in 20 patients (13.3%) and 40 patients (26.7%) were treated with radiotherapy. Ninety (60%) patients underwent transurethral resection of the bladder tumor only without further definitive treatment for personal reasons. The actuarial 5-year overall survival for all patients was as follows: radical cystectomy, 50%; radiotherapy, 22.7%; and transurethral resection of the bladder tumor only, 8.3% (log-rank p = 0.029). For stage T2 patients, the 5-year overall survival was: radical cystectomy, 62.5%; radiotherapy, 31.2%; and transurethral resection of the bladder tumor only, 8.3% (log-rank p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: In our series, radical cystectomy had a superior outcome to radiotherapy or transurethral resection of the bladder tumor only, comparable with results reported elsewhere. Radical cystectomy should be offered as the gold standard treatment for organ-confined muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Outcomes and predictors of localized or locally-advanced prostate cancer treated by radiotherapy in Indonesia.

PURPOSE: Presently there is no published data on the outcomes of localized or locally-advanced prostate cancer (PCa) treated by external-beam radiotherapy (RT) in Indonesia. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 96 patients with localized or locally-advanced PCa treated by RT from year 1995 to 2009, at the national referral hospital and the national cancer hospital of Indonesia. Cumulative prostate and pelvic radiation dose/type was <70 Gy conventional RT in 84.4% patients, and ≥70 Gy Three dimensional-conformal or intensity modulated RT in 15.6% patients. Overall survival (OS) and biochemical progression-free survival (BFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier. Predictors of OS and biochemical recurrence were analyzed by multivariate Cox regressions. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 61 months (range, 24 to 169 months). There were 3.1% low-risk, 26% intermediate-risk, and 70.8% high-risk cases. More than half of the patients (52.1%) had pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/mL. The 5-year survival outcome of low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients were: OS, 100%, 94.7%, and 67.9% (P=0.297); and BFS, 100%, 94.1%, and 57.1% (P=0.016), respectively. In the high-risk group, the 5-year OS was 88.3% in patients who received adjuvant hormonal androgen deprivation therapy (HT), compared to 53% in RT only, P=0.08. Significant predictors of OS include high-risk group (hazard Ratio [HR], 9.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52 to 57.6; P=0.016), adjuvant therapy (HR, 0.175; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.58; P=0.005), detection by transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) (HR, 6.81; 95% CI, 2.28 to 20.33; P=0.001), and pretreatment PSA (HR, 1.003; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.005; P=0.039). The sole predictor of biochemical failure was pretreatment PSA (P=0.04), with odds ratio of 4.52 (95% CI, 1.61 to 12.65) for PSA >20 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: RT is an effective treatment modality for localized or locally-advanced PCa in Indonesian patients, with outcomes and predictors consistent to that reported elsewhere. Predictors of poorer outcomes include high-risk group, higher pretreatment PSA, incidental detection by TUR-P, and lack of adjuvant HT. Adjuvant hormonal therapy significantly improve the survival of high risk patients.

Prostate cancer in younger and older patients: do we treat them differently?

Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of prostate cancer may largely influenced by patients' age at presentation. This study is aimed to evaluate the characteristics, diagnostic and treatment strategies in prostate cancer patients in our centres. A cross-sectional analytic study of prostate cancer data in two main referral cancer centres, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital and Dharmais National Cancer Centre from 1995-2010, was therefore performed. Patients were divided into 2 sub-populations; below 60 years (younger patients) and 75 years old and above (older patients). PSA levels, diagnostic modalities, Gleason score and therapeutic options were analysed for both and compared using bivariate analysis. 152 patients were <60 years and 210 were ≥75 years. There was no statistical difference in mean PSA level (797.9ng/mL vs 345.3 ng/mL, respectively; p>0.05) and diagnosis was made by biopsy in majority of patients in both groups (68.2% and 71.6% in younger and older groups respectively). Most presented with an advanced disease stage (65.1% and 66.0%, respectively) and there was no statistically significant difference in mean Gleason scores f (8.1 vs 7.7; p>0.05). Primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) was the main treatment for overall patients (48.0% and 50.7%, respectively). Radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy are the main therapeutic modalities for younger patients with local and locally advanced disease (39.6% and 35.4% respectively), while the majority of older patients with the same disease stage were treated with radiotherapy and PADT (45.8% and 39.0% respectively). Differences observed in treatment modalities were statistically significant (p<0.0003). We conclude that there is no difference in disease clinical aggressiveness of the two groups but significant differences were obseved in therapeutic strategies utilised with younger and older patients.