Downregulation of CD44v6 in colorectal carcinomas is associated with hypermethylation of the CD44 promoter region.

Overexpression of the cell adhesion protein CD44v6 has been demonstrated in colorectal cancer and other gastrointestinal tumors. While CD44v6 is upregulated in benign colorectal adenomas and well-differentiated colorectal cancer tissues, downregulation frequently occurs during disease progression. The mechanism of downregulation, however, is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the methylation status of the CD44 promoter as a mechanism for decreased CD44v6 expression in advanced colorectal carcinomas. We demonstrated by methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion that the CpG islands of the CD44 promoter were methylated in 6/21 (28%) of benign colorectal adenomas. Interestingly, in colorectal carcinomas the frequency of promoter methylation was significantly increased (10/19; 53%) compared to 7/21 (33%) in the corresponding normal mucosa. Methylation seems to be associated with a more advanced cancer stage, but the trend did not reach statistical significance. In colorectal carcinomas with CD44 promoter methylation CD44v6 mRNA was detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in 3/10 carcinomas, whereas in tumors without CD44 promoter methylation CD44v6 expression was observed in 8/9 (P

Hypermethylation of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily 6 (APT1, Fas, CD95/Apo-1) gene promoter at rel/nuclear factor kappaB sites in prostatic carcinoma.

DNA hypermethylation of CpG-rich promoter sequences is associated with tumor suppressor gene inactivation in many human cancers, notably in carcinoma of the prostate and the urinary bladder. Recently, the mouse homologue of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily 6 (TNFRSF6) gene was reported to be inactivated by DNA methylation in various cell types. The Fas (CD95, Apo-1) protein encoded by the TNFRSF6 gene is an important mediator of apoptosis, which also is downregulated in different types of human carcinoma. We therefore investigated the methylation of the TNFRSF6 promoter in prostatic and bladder carcinomas and cell lines. In a restriction enzyme polymerase chain reaction assay, four of 32 prostatic carcinomas and three of 15 advanced bladder carcinomas showed evidence of hypermethylation at the rel/nuclear factor kappaB (NFkappaB) binding sites essential for promoter activity. The DU145 cell line derived from a metastasis of a prostate carcinoma also displayed hypermethylation in this assay, which was confirmed by bisulfite sequencing. Treatment of DU145 cells with the methylation inhibitor deoxyazacytidine slightly increased Fas protein expression, as detected by flow cytometry analysis. In vitro methylation of the TNFRSF6 promoter at the rel/NFkappaB sites completely abolished its activity. Thus, although the TNFRSF6 gene can be inactivated efficiently by DNA methylation, hypermethylation occurs neither frequently nor extensively in human carcinomas and appears to play a limited role in downregulation of Fas expression.

High frequency of alterations in DNA methylation in adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

BACKGROUND: Alterations of DNA methylation have been reported in many human cancers. In prostatic carcinoma, hypermethylation of the GST P gene promoter and an overall decrease in methylcytosine content have been reported. The aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency and extent of these alterations in relation to tumor stage and grade, in order to explore their clinical relevance and to determine their relationship to each other. METHODS: DNA from 32 histologically verified adenocarcinomas of the prostate was analyzed for GST P hypermethylation by a semiquantitative PCR method and for overall DNA methylation by quantitative Southern blot analysis or LM-PCR of LINE-1 repetitive sequence methylation. RESULTS: GST P hypermethylation was detected in 24/32 (75%) specimens, and LINE-1 hypomethylation in 17/32 (53%). Both alterations tended to increase in frequency and extent with tumor stage. All but 1 of 8 carcinomas with lymph node involvement were positive for GST P hypermethylation. Six of these as compared to 2 out of 24 showed strong hypomethylation (P = 0.005). Hypermethylation and hypomethylation did not show a quantitative correlation, but all except two samples with weak LINE-1 hypomethylation also displayed GST P hypermethylation. CONCLUSIONS: GST P hypermethylation is an extremely frequent change in prostatic carcinoma which most probably precedes genome-wide hypomethylation. It appears useful for sensitive detection of prostatic carcinoma, whereas pronounced LINE-1 hypomethylation may be associated with progressive tumors.