Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Chromatogr A ; 884(1-2): 229-41, 2000 Jul 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10917442

ABSTRACT

Groundwaters originating from local and regional aquifers surrounding ash deposits produced by a coal-fired power plant were collected. These water samples were chemically analyzed for quantifying their heavy metal composition at trace levels. A highly sensitive analytical technique based on ion chromatography with a UV-Vis detector and under isocratic eluent flow-rate conditions was used. In order to quantify the major heavy metals (Pb, Cu, Cd, Co, Zn and Ni), three ionic separation column systems were evaluated: (1) a cationic column (HPIC-CS2, Dionex) tested with two eluents (10 mM oxalic acid-7.5 mM citric acid; and 40 mM D-tartaric acid-12 mM citric acid); (2) an anionic column (HPIC-AS4, Dionex) evaluated with 25 mM oxalic acid as eluent: and (3) a bifunctional ion-exchange column (Ionpac CS5, Dionex) which was also tested with two eluents (6 mM pyridine, 2,6-dicarboxylic acid; and 50 mM oxalic acid/95 mM lithium hydroxide). The lowest detection limits achieved with the Ionpac CS5 column and the 50 mM oxalic acid-95 mM lithium hydroxide eluent enabled the heavy metal analysis in groundwater samples to be reliably performed. Details of this comparative study, including the ion chromatography procedure selected and its application to heavy metal analysis of groundwater samples, are presented in this work.


Subject(s)
Chromatography, Ion Exchange/methods , Metals, Heavy/analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL