ABSTRACT
Consumption of high Glycemic Index (GI) foods is a risk factor for increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM). The extent of variation in starch digestibility and GI of Yam varieties and products is not yet fully understood. This study was therefore designed to evaluate in vitro and in vivo Glycemic Index properties of commonly consumed products prepared from varieties of White Yam. Four products (boiled, fried, pounded yam, and Amala) were prepared from 5 common varieties of Yam and evaluated for Digestible Starch (DS) and Resistant Starch (RS). Based on results, two products-pounded yam and Amala-were processed from three of the most popular varieties. Analysis of Rapidly Digestible Starch (RDS), Slowly Digestible Starch (SDS), and estimated in vitro GI (eGI) were then carried out in this stage. Glycemic Index (GI) of these products consumed by apparently healthy young adults were also determined. Variety Amula had highest DS in Amala (19.1/100 g) and pounded Yam (20.4/100 g) while variety Alumaco had highest RS in all the products (2.9-3.3/100 g). When compared with RS in its raw tuber, RS of Alumaco generally increased after processing. Variety Alumaco had lowest RDS in Amala (0.6/100 g) and pounded yam (0.3/100 g) while eGI was lowest in Alumaco made into Amala (53) and pounded yam (48). Assessment of GI resulted in high GI for all products across each variety. Irrespective of variety, processing Yam into Amala released RDS fraction faster when compared with pounded yam. Generally, even though the products are considered as having high GI, Amala raised eGI and GI faster than Pounded yam. Variety-Alumaco particularly showed favorable properties applicable to dietary management of diabetes. Exploring more processing methods and genetic diversity is recommended.
ABSTRACT
In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is rapidly increasing even in populations with significant undernutrition. The role of energy dense staple crops such as cassava is under query and not yet well understood. In this study, varieties of cassava, made into popular SSA products (fufu and gari dough) were studied for their resistant starch (RS), rapidly digestible starch (RDS) and glycemic index (GI). While the glycemic properties of the varieties studied did not differ significantly, processing any variety into either fufu or gari distinctly impacted RS, RDS and predicted GI (pGI) differently. Specifically, fufu had highest range of RS (1.1-2.1 g/100 g) while gari dough had highest RDS (1.1-1.4 g/100 g) and pGI (54-67). The results from this probe imply that fufu, when consumed, will release glucose in a slower manner than gari, therefore may be better suited in the dietary prevention and management of DM.
Subject(s)
Food Analysis/methods , Glycemic Index , Manihot/metabolism , Starch/metabolism , Hydrolysis , Manihot/chemistryABSTRACT
Plant breeding efforts in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have produced biofortified cassava with high carotenoid content to address vitamin A deficiencies (VAD). Since carotenoids in foods are easily depleted during processing, the retention of ß-carotene in some newly released cassava varieties is under query. From four of these new varieties, two commonly consumed products (gari and its dough) were processed according to standard methods. Retention of ß-carotene was then probed after applying fermentation periods of a day and three days. The possible contribution of the products to Vitamin A intake in children, adolescents, and women was also assessed. The concentration of ß-carotene in fresh Cassava roots ranged from 5.32 to 7.81 µg/g. The percentage retention ranged from 14.4 to 29.3% and 10 to 21.7% in gari fermented for one and three days respectively. The impact of varietal difference and length of fermentation was significant on retention in the intermediate and final products (p < 0.001). When compared with dietary intake data, cooking biofortified gari into its dough reduced Vitamin A intake in most varieties. We conclude that processing Cassava into gari (especially its dough) could hinder the retention of ß-carotene however some varieties have retention advantage over others irrespective of the initial concentration in their fresh roots.