Management of acute renal replacement therapy in critically ill cirrhotic patients.

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) in cirrhotic patients encompasses a number of issues related to the particular characteristics of this population, especially in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. The short-term prognosis of cirrhotic patients with acute kidney injury is poor, with a mortality rate higher than 65% in patients with RRT requirement, raising questions about the futility of its initiation. Regarding the management of the RRT itself, there is still no consensus with respect to the modality (continuous versus intermittent) or the anticoagulation required to improve the circuit life, which is shorter than similar at-risk populations, despite the altered haemostasis in traditional coagulation tests frequently found in these patients. Furthermore, volume management is one of the most complex issues in this cohort, where tools used for ambulatory dialysis have not yet been successfully reproducible in the ICU setting. This review attempts to shed light on the management of acute RRT in the critically ill cirrhotic population based on the current evidence and the newly available tools. We will discuss the timing of RRT initiation and cessation, the modality, anticoagulation and fluid management, as well as the outcomes of the RRT in this population, and provide a brief review of the albumin extracorporeal dialysis from the point of view of a nephrologist.

Tigecycline population pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with decompensated cirrhosis and severe infections.

OBJECTIVES: Physiopathological changes in advanced cirrhosis could alter tigecycline pharmacokinetics (PK), thus affecting serum drug concentrations and compromising target attainment. We aimed to describe tigecycline PK in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and severe bacterial infections, identify the sources of PK variability and assess the performance of different dosing regimens to optimize the PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target. METHODS: Serum concentrations and covariates were obtained from patients with severe infections under tigecycline treatment. A population PK analysis was performed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling and the final model was used to simulate tigecycline exposure to assess the PTA. RESULTS: Twenty critically ill patients were enrolled in the study. Data were best described by a two-compartment linear model. Mean ± SD parameter estimates for clearance (CL), intercompartmental clearance (Q), central and peripheral volumes of distribution (V1 and V2) were 14.8 ± 11 L/h, 38.4 ± 24 L/h, 63.7 ± 14 L and 233 ± 30 L, respectively. MELD score significantly influenced tigecycline CL, and total serum proteins significantly affected V1. Monte Carlo simulations showed that tigecycline elimination is hampered as MELD score values increase, consequently requiring lower drug doses. Patients with hypoproteinaemia would have lower peak tigecycline concentrations but similar steady-state concentrations compared with patients with normoproteinaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that tigecycline dose adjustment is needed in severe hepatic dysfunction and suggests using the MELD score for dose optimization since it is identified as a covariate that significantly influences tigecycline CL. Dosing regimens are recommended to reach several PK/PD targets considering this clinical variable and any MIC within the susceptibility range.

Meropenem population pharmacokinetics in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and severe infections.

OBJECTIVES: Meropenem pharmacokinetics (PK) may be altered in patients with cirrhosis, hampering target attainment. We aimed to describe meropenem PK in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and severe bacterial infections, identify the sources of PK variability and assess the performance of different dosing regimens to optimize the PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target. METHODS: Serum concentrations and covariates were obtained from patients with severe infections under meropenem treatment. A population PK analysis was performed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling and the final model was used to simulate meropenem exposure to assess the PTA. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled in the study. Data were best described by a one-compartment linear model. The estimated typical mean value for clearance (CL) was 8.35 L/h and the estimated volume of distribution (V) was 28.2 L. Creatinine clearance (CLCR) and MELD score significantly influenced meropenem CL, and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) significantly affected V. Monte Carlo simulations showed that a lower meropenem dose would be needed as CLCR decreases and as the MELD score increases. Patients with ACLF would have lower peak meropenem concentrations but similar steady-state concentrations compared with patients with no ACLF. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified two new covariates that influence meropenem PK in patients with decompensated cirrhosis in addition to CLCR: MELD score and ACLF. Dosing regimens are recommended to reach several PK/PD targets considering these clinical variables and any MIC within the susceptibility range.

High cut-off membrane for in-vivo dialysis of free plasma hemoglobin in a patient with massive hemolysis.

BACKGROUND: The possibility of clearing Cell-free Plasma Hemoglobin (CPH) from human plasma may appear attractive, especially when considering the noxious effects that CPH has on the immune function and the renal damage caused by its filtration. The existence of the so-called High Cut-Off (HCO) filters, possessing pores as big as 60 kDa, could potentially allow the clearance of the αß dimers (31.3 kDa), the form in which the α2ß2 hemoglobin tetramers (62.6 kDa) physiologically dissociate in plasma. We present herein the first reported case in which such an attempt was made. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 51-year-old man with hemolytic crisis due to glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, further complicated by pigment-induced nephropathy. He underwent a 48-h CVVHD session, in which a HCO filter was used. The Sieving Coefficient (SC) for CPH was initially 0.08 and decreased to 0.02 after 24 h. This unexpected low SC was due to the initial high concentration of CPH (4.24 g/L). At such concentrations, the α2ß2 tetramer poorly dissociates into the αß dimer; but increases exponentially at concentrations lower than 1 g/L. CONCLUSIONS: Clearance of CPH through a HCO filter is technically feasible but its performance markedly relies on the initial concentration of CPH. Critically ill patients with smoldering hemolysis, as it happens during septic shock or ECMO treatment, may benefit the most from the use of this membrane in order to clear CPH.

Treatment of resistant pruritus from cholestasis with albumin dialysis: combined analysis of patients from three centers.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Albumin dialysis using molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is a new procedure for treating resistant pruritus from cholestasis, but it is usually published as a case report or a short series. Therefore, we analyzed patients with resistant pruritus treated with MARS from three centers, to assess the changes on pruritus and the indices of cholestasis. METHODS: Twenty patients (12 female, mean age: 51+/-3.4 years) with chronic cholestatic liver disease or chronic liver-graft rejection were evaluated. The severity of pruritus was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after treatment, and 30 days thereafter. Liver tests, including total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl-transferase, cholesterol, triglycerides, and total bile acid were also determined, as well as the number of sessions and the coupled procedure (dialysis or perfusion). RESULTS: Albumin dialysis resulted in a decrease of pruritus (VAS: from 70.2+/-4.8 to 20.1+/-4.2, p<0.001), which partially resumed after 30 days (38.7+/-6.6). VAS decreased by 72% immediately after treatment and by 51% after 1 month. Pruritus decreased in all but one patient. MARS resulted in a significant bile acid decrease of 41% after treatment and by 37% after 1 month. The effect of MARS on pruritus and markers of cholestasis was similar in patients with different diseases and was independent of the coupled procedure. The improvement of pruritus in individuals was positive in 75% of patients. No major adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Albumin dialysis using MARS is an effective procedure for managing resistant pruritus in most patients with chronic cholestasis and graft rejection.