Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Lancet Glob Health ; 10(12): e1744-e1753, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36240806

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cataract is the leading cause of blindness globally. Effective cataract surgical coverage (eCSC) measures the number of people in a population who have been operated on for cataract, and had a good outcome, as a proportion of all people operated on or requiring surgery. Therefore, eCSC describes service access (ie, cataract surgical coverage, [CSC]) adjusted for quality. The 74th World Health Assembly endorsed a global target for eCSC of a 30-percentage point increase by 2030. To enable monitoring of progress towards this target, we analysed Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) survey data to establish baseline estimates of eCSC and CSC. METHODS: In this secondary analysis, we used data from 148 RAAB surveys undertaken in 55 countries (2003-21) to calculate eCSC, CSC, and the relative quality gap (% difference between eCSC and CSC). Eligible studies were any version of the RAAB survey conducted since 2000 with individual participant survey data and census population data for people aged 50 years or older in the sampling area and permission from the study's principal investigator for use of data. We compared median eCSC between WHO regions and World Bank income strata and calculated the pooled risk difference and risk ratio comparing eCSC in men and women. FINDINGS: Country eCSC estimates ranged from 3·8% (95% CI 2·1-5·5) in Guinea Bissau, 2010, to 70·3% (95% CI 65·8-74·9) in Hungary, 2015, and the relative quality gap from 10·8% (CSC: 65·7%, eCSC: 58·6%) in Argentina, 2013, to 73·4% (CSC: 14·3%, eCSC: 3·8%) in Guinea Bissau, 2010. Median eCSC was highest among high-income countries (60·5% [IQR 55·6-65·4]; n=2 surveys; 2011-15) and lowest among low-income countries (14·8%; [IQR 8·3-20·7]; n=14 surveys; 2005-21). eCSC was higher in men than women (148 studies pooled risk difference 3·2% [95% CI 2·3-4·1] and pooled risk ratio of 1·20 [95% CI 1·15-1·25]). INTERPRETATION: eCSC varies widely between countries, increases with greater income level, and is higher in men. In pursuit of 2030 targets, many countries, particularly in lower-resource settings, should emphasise quality improvement before increasing access to surgery. Equity must be embedded in efforts to improve access to surgery, with a focus on underserved groups. FUNDING: Indigo Trust, Peek Vision, and Wellcome Trust.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Male , Adult , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Cataract/epidemiology , Cataract/complications , Blindness/epidemiology , Global Health , Health Surveys , Prevalence
2.
Ophthalmology ; 128(2): 188-196, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32652205

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of distance and near visual impairment on self-reported near visual functioning (VF) in a multinational study. DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants aged 35 years or older were selected randomly with cluster sampling at 7 sites: rural sites in Nepal (Kaski) and India (Madurai), a semirural site in China (Shunyi), semiurban sites in South Africa (Durban) and Niger (Dosso), and urban sites in the United States (Los Angeles) and China (Guangzhou). METHODS: Binocular presenting distance and near visual acuity (VA) were measured with a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution tumbling E chart at 4 m and 40 cm, respectively. A 12-item near VF questionnaire interview was administered by trained local interviewers, with responses scored from 100 to 0 as visual disability increased. Multiple linear regression was used to investigate the association of age, gender, education, and VA with overall eyesight, difficulty with activities, and social functioning subscale scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual functioning subscale scores. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 6851 questionnaire respondents. The VF subscale scores decreased significantly with worse distance and near VA, and even mildly impaired VA could result in reduced VF. Lower VF subscale scores were associated with older age at 4 sites, female gender at 3 sites, and greater education at 2 sites. The influence of near VA was greater than distance VA at 3 sites, and at 1 site, distance VA was more influential than near VA. With study site included in the regression modeling, lower scores for the overall eyesight subscale (compared with the Shunyi reference site) were found in Guangzhou, Kaski, and Durban; lower difficulty in activities scores were found in Kaski and Durban, but better scores were found in Guangzhou and Madurai; and social functioning scores were lower in Kaski, Durban, and Dosso. CONCLUSIONS: Along the entire VA spectrum, lower levels of distance and near VA led to significant reductions in VF subscale scores, with wide variation both within and between study sites. The impact of near vision on VF should receive greater emphasis with further investigation in various socioeconomic and cultural settings.


Subject(s)
Vision Disorders/ethnology , Vision Disorders/physiopathology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Visually Impaired Persons/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Global Health , Humans , Internationality , Male , Middle Aged , Presbyopia/ethnology , Presbyopia/physiopathology , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Self Report , Sex Distribution , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Vision, Binocular/physiology
3.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0243005, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33259555

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine the prevalence and causes of blindness, vision impairment and cataract surgery coverage among Rohingya refugees aged ≥ 50 years residing in camps in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh. METHODS: We used the Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) methodology to select 76 clusters of 50 participants aged ≥ 50 years with probability proportionate to size. Demographic and cataract surgery data were collected using questionnaires, visual acuity was assessed per World Health Organization criteria and examinations were conducted by torch, and with direct ophthalmoscopy in eyes with pinhole-corrected vision <6/12. RAAB software was used for data entry and analysis. RESULTS: We examined 3,629 of 3800 selected persons (95.5%). Age and sex adjusted prevalence of blindness (<3/60), severe visual impairment (SVI; >3/60 to ≤6/60), moderate visual impairment (MVI; >6/60 to ≤6/18), and early visual impairment (EVI; >6/18 to ≤6/12) were 2.14%, 2.35%, 9.68% and 14.7% respectively. Cataract was responsible for 75.0% of blindness and 75.8% of SVI, while refractive error caused 47.9% and 90.9% of MVI and EVI respectively. Most vision loss (95.9%) was avoidable. Cataract surgical coverage among the blind was 81.2%. Refractive error was detected in 17.1% (n = 622) of participants and 95.2% (n = 592) of these did not have spectacles. In the full Rohingya cohort of 76,692, approximately 10,000 surgeries are needed to correct all eyes impaired (<6/18) by cataract, 12,000 need distance glasses and 73,000 require presbyopic correction. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of blindness was lower than expected for a displaced population, in part due to few Rohingya being ≥60 years and the camp's good access to cataract surgery. We suggest the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees include eye care among recommended health services for all refugees with long-term displacement.


Subject(s)
Blindness/prevention & control , Blindness/surgery , Cataract Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bangladesh , Blindness/epidemiology , Blindness/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myanmar/epidemiology , Myanmar/ethnology , Presbyopia/epidemiology , Prevalence , Refractive Errors/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Ophthalmology ; 121(1): 417-422, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23993359

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence, potential determinants, and proportion of met need for near vision impairment (NVI) correctable with refraction approximately 2 years after initial examination of a multi-country cohort. DESIGN: Population-based, prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: People aged ≥35 years examined at baseline in semi-rural (Shunyi) and urban (Guangzhou) sites in China; rural sites in Nepal (Kaski), India (Madurai), and Niger (Dosso); a semi-urban site (Durban) in South Africa; and an urban site (Los Angeles) in the United States. METHODS: Near visual acuity (NVA) with and without current near correction was measured at 40 cm using a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution near vision tumbling E chart. Participants with uncorrected binocular NVA ≤20/40 were tested with plus sphere lenses to obtain best-corrected binocular NVA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of total NVI (defined as uncorrected NVA ≤20/40) and NVI correctable and uncorrectable to >20/40, and current spectacle wearing among those with bilateral NVA ≤20/63 improving to >20/40 with near correction (met need). RESULTS: Among 13 671 baseline participants, 10 533 (77.2%) attended the follow-up examination. The prevalence of correctable NVI increased with age from 35 to 50-60 years and then decreased at all sites. Multiple logistic regression modeling suggested that correctable NVI was not associated with gender at any site, whereas more educated persons aged >54 years were associated with a higher prevalence of correctable NVI in Nepal and India. Although near vision spectacles were provided free at baseline, wear among those who could benefit was <40% at all but 2 centers (Guangzhou and Los Angeles). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of correctable NVI is greatest among persons of working age, and rates of correction are low in many settings, suggesting that strategies targeting the workplace may be needed.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Eyeglasses/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Refractive Errors/ethnology , Refractive Errors/therapy , Visually Impaired Persons/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Africa/epidemiology , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asia/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Visual Acuity
5.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 154(1): 107-116.e1, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22534109

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of near vision impairment and use of corrective spectacles among middle-aged and older adults in different settings and ethnic groups. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. METHODS: People aged ≥ 35 years were randomly selected with cluster sampling in 4 rural settings in Shunyi (China), Kaski (Nepal), Madurai (India), and Dosso (Niger); 1 semi-urban area in Durban (South Africa); and 2 urban settings in Guangzhou (China) and Los Angeles (USA). Near visual acuity (VA), with and without presenting near correction, was measured at 40 cm using a logMAR near vision tumbling E chart. Subjects with uncorrected binocular near VA ≤ 20/40 were tested with plus spheres to obtain the best-corrected binocular VA. RESULTS: A total of 17 734 persons aged ≥ 35 years were enumerated and 14 805 (83.5%) were examined. The age- and sex-standardized prevalence of uncorrected near vision impairment (VA ≤ 20/40) ranged from 49% in Dosso to 60% in Shunyi and Guangzhou, 65% in Kaski and Los Angeles, and 83% in Madurai and Durban. The prevalence of near vision impairment based on best-corrected visual acuity was less than 10% in Guangzhou, Kaski, Durban, and Los Angeles, but as high as 23% in Madurai. In multiple logistic regression models, uncorrected near vision impairment was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.14, P < .001) and female sex (OR = 1.12, P = .027), but not with educational level (OR = 1.01, P = .812). Over 90% of people in need of near refractive correction in rural settings did not have the necessary spectacles. These rates were 40% in urban settings. CONCLUSIONS: By 50 years of age, the majority of people suffer from near vision impairment, most of which can be corrected optically. Over 90% of those in need of near refractive correction in rural settings do not have the necessary spectacles.


Subject(s)
Eyeglasses , Myopia/epidemiology , Myopia/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Nepal/epidemiology , Niger/epidemiology , Prevalence , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , South Africa/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Vision, Low/epidemiology , Vision, Low/therapy , Visual Acuity/physiology , Visually Impaired Persons
6.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 17(2): 82-9, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20302430

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Gaur Eye Hospital, which provides eye care services to the people in Rautahat and adjacent districts, completed 9 years of operation in 2006. Over 14,000 cataract surgeries were performed during this period. This study aimed to ascertain the impact of the hospital services by estimating the prevalence of blindness, visual impairment and cataract surgical coverage among the older adult population of the Rautahat district. METHODS: People aged 50 years and older were enrolled in this study that used a stratified cluster design. Subjects in 32 randomly selected clusters were identified through door-to-door visits, presenting and corrected visual acuities measurement, and clinical examination by ophthalmologists were conducted at a centrally located site. RESULTS: Of the 5,533 identified subjects, 85.3% were examined. Blindness was defined as presenting with visual acuity < 6/60 in both eyes. Blindness was found in 17.4% (95% Confidence Interval: 15.1 to 19.7); however, 55.6% of individuals examined had vision < 6/18 in one or both eyes. Cataracts were the principal cause of blindness in 82.1%, and were associated with elder age, illiteracy and female gender. Surgical coverage was found to be 37.3%. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that despite 9 years of hospital and community eye care services the prevalence of blindness in this area is still challengingly high and the cataract surgical coverage unacceptably low. Community outreach awareness programs and accessibility for the Nepali cataract blind to the hospital need to be upgraded.


Subject(s)
Blindness/epidemiology , Cataract Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Cataract/epidemiology , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Functional Laterality , Geography , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nepal/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Visual Acuity/physiology , Visually Impaired Persons/statistics & numerical data
7.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 15(1): 17-23, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18300085

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Assess visual impairment in school children of upper-middle socioeconomic status in Kathmandu for comparison with rural Jhapa District. METHODS: Random selection of classes from secondary private schools in Kathmandu was used to identify the study sample. Children in 130 classes at 43 schools were enumerated using school records and examined between January-May 2006. Examinations included visual acuity testing, ocular motility evaluation, cycloplegic refraction, and examination of the external eye, anterior segment, media, and fundus. The principal cause was determined for eyes with uncorrected visual acuity < or = 20/40. RESULTS: A total of 4,501 children in grades 5-9 were enumerated; 4282 (95.1%) were examined. The prevalence of uncorrected, presenting, and best-corrected visual impairment (< or = 20/40) in the better eye was 18.6%, 9.1%, and 0.86%, respectively. Refractive error was a cause in 93.3% of children with uncorrected visual impairment, amblyopia 1.8%, retinal disorders 1.3%, other causes 0.3%, and unexplained causes 4.4%. Among children correctable in at least one eye, 46.3% presented without the necessary spectacles. Visual impairment with myopia (-0.50 diopters) ranged from 10.9% in 10 year-olds to 27.3% in 15 year-olds, compared to 0.5%-3.0% in rural Jhapa District. Myopic visual impairment was associated with grade level, female gender, parental education, parental spectacle usage, and Mongol ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Visual impairment with myopia among upper-middle socioeconomic school children in Kathmandu is higher than that in rural Nepal, and a public health problem because nearly half are without corrective spectacles. Effective strategies are needed to eliminate this easily treatable cause of visual impairment.


Subject(s)
Refractive Errors/epidemiology , Social Class , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Visually Impaired Persons/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Eyeglasses/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Nepal/epidemiology , Prevalence , Visual Acuity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...