Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 58(6): 482-487, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31475854

ABSTRACT

Context: Slime is a slow-flowing material with viscoelastic properties which is attractive to children. Its preparation is based on the crosslinking of polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetate or starch with boric acid.Objectives: The goal of this study was to describe the adverse effects of Slime.Materials and methods: This is a descriptive retrospective study of cases of exposure reported to French Poison Control Centres between January 2014 and May 2018. The following parameters were used: age and sex, date and circumstances of exposure, symptoms and severity.Results: Two hundred and eight (208) cases of exposure were recorded, 93 cases happened in 2017, and 88 cases in the first four and a half months of 2018. The average age was of 8 years old; 190 patients were younger than 15. Fifty-seven percent (57%) were female. Regarding routes of exposure, 168 were oral, 30 cutaneous, eight ocular, one inhalation and one ear exposure. Eighty-two (82) patients were symptomatic, including 81 cases of low severity and one of average severity (keratitis). All cases lead to recovery.Conclusion: No significant adverse health effects are expected to develop if only small amounts are swallowed; making Slime with home ingredients is a potential cause of boric acid exposure that must be supervised by adults.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Contact/etiology , Play and Playthings , Poison Control Centers , Polymers/poisoning , Viscoelastic Substances/poisoning , Adolescent , Child , Databases, Factual , Female , France , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Int J Pharm ; 500(1-2): 336-44, 2016 Mar 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26804927

ABSTRACT

Selecting the most appropriate dosage form, that ensures safe administration and adherence of medications, is a major issue for children. Marketed drugs, however, have rarely been tested for their use in children. There is a need for more data on drug formulations administered to children to identify unmet needs, and drive future paediatric research. We observed, over a 12-month follow-up, 117,665 oral drug administrations to 1998 hospitalized children. Nine-tenths belonged to five Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classes: Alimentary tract & metabolism, Nervous system, Cardiovascular system, Anti-infectives for systemic use and Blood & blood forming organs, one third of drug doses administered to school-age children and adolescents were liquids, and extemporaneous capsules were commonly used in younger children. Our study shows that despite the advantages of solid dosage forms and recent evidence from randomized controlled trials showing their acceptability in infants, they are seldom used in paediatric practice.


Subject(s)
Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Dosage Forms , France , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn
3.
Toxicon ; 108: 97-103, 2015 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26454165

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy is the gold standard treatment for patients bitten by European vipers in France; it significantly decreases morbidity, frequency and severity of complications and length of stay. A national prospective study was performed by all Poison Control Centers (PCC) to validate the emergency protocol for viper envenomations. METHODS: This prospective study included all cases of viper bites in France, treated or not with Viperfav(®) in 2013. RESULTS: In 2013, 277 cases of viper bites were collected: ratio M/F 2.1; mean aged 43 years (<15 years 25% 15-65 63% > 65 12%). The final severity was divided into 68 grades 0, 58 grades I, 62 grades IIA, 71 grades IIB and 18 grades III. One death was reported. Five patients had neurological signs. For the 114 patients who received Viperfav(®), all systemic signs disappeared in 5 h and in 24 h for biological and neurological signs. No severe anaphylactic reaction with Viperfav(®) was reported. Late Viperfav(®) administration increased the risk of functional impairment 15 days after the bite (OR = 3.21 p = 0.043). The administration of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) increased the frequency of functional impairment to 15 days after the bite (OR = 6.38 p = 0.064), although Viperfav(®) was given in the first 18 h. DISCUSSION: This study confirms the efficiency, safety and recommendation of an early administration of a single dose of Viperfav(®), LMWH should not be used. It also shows the extension of neurotoxic venom of vipers in France.


Subject(s)
Snake Bites/epidemiology , Viperidae , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Animals , Antivenins/adverse effects , Antivenins/therapeutic use , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Snake Bites/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...