Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Mov Disord ; 33(2): 329-332, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29278279

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying may impair l-dopa absorption, contributing to motor fluctuations. We evaluated the effect of camicinal (GSK962040), a gastroprokinetic, on the absorption of l-dopa and symptoms of PD. METHODS: Phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized to receive camicinal 50 mg once-daily (n = 38) or placebo (n = 20) for 7 to 9 days. RESULTS: l-dopa exposure was similar with coadministration of camicinal compared to placebo. Median time to maximum l-dopa concentration was reduced, indicating more rapid absorption of l-dopa. Camicinal resulted in significant reduction in OFF time (-2.31 hours; 95% confidence interval: -3.71, -0.90), significant increase in ON time (+1.88 hours; 95% confidence interval: 0.28, 3.48) per day, and significant decrease in mean total MDS-UPDRS score (-12.5; 95% confidence interval: -19.67, -5.29). Camicinal treatment was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: PD symptom improvement with camicinal occurred in parallel with more rapid absorption of l-dopa. This study provides evidence of an improvement of the motor response to l-dopa in people with PD treated with camicinal 50 mg once-daily compared with placebo, which will require further evaluation. © 2017 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Antiparkinson Agents/pharmacokinetics , Area Under Curve , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Levodopa/pharmacokinetics , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Piperazines/pharmacokinetics , Piperidines/pharmacokinetics , Statistics, Nonparametric
3.
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 41(11): 2647-57, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27109624

ABSTRACT

The A118G single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP rs1799971) in the µ-opioid receptor gene, OPRM1, has been much studied in relation to alcohol use disorders. The reported effects of allelic variation at this SNP on alcohol-related behaviors, and on opioid receptor antagonist treatments, have been inconsistent. We investigated the pharmacogenetic interaction between A118G variation and the effects of two µ-opioid receptor antagonists in a clinical lab setting. Fifty-six overweight and moderate-heavy drinkers were prospectively stratified by genotype (29 AA homozygotes, 27 carriers of at least 1 G allele) in a double-blind placebo-controlled, three-period crossover design with naltrexone (NTX; 25 mg OD for 2 days, then 50 mg OD for 3 days) and GSK1521498 (10 mg OD for 5 days). The primary end point was regional brain activation by the contrast between alcohol and neutral tastes measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Secondary end points included other fMRI contrasts, subjective responses to intravenous alcohol challenge, and food intake. GSK1521498 (but not NTX) significantly attenuated fMRI activation by appetitive tastes in the midbrain and amygdala. GSK1521498 (and NTX to a lesser extent) significantly affected self-reported responses to alcohol infusion. Both drugs reduced food intake. Across all end points, there was less robust evidence for significant effects of OPRM1 allelic variation, or for pharmacogenetic interactions between genotype and drug treatment. These results do not support strong modulatory effects of OPRM1 genetic variation on opioid receptor antagonist attenuation of alcohol- and food-related behaviors. However, they do support further investigation of GSK1521498 as a potential therapeutic for alcohol use and eating disorders.


Subject(s)
Drinking/drug effects , Drinking/genetics , Indans/pharmacology , Naltrexone/pharmacology , Narcotic Antagonists/pharmacology , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Receptors, Opioid, mu/genetics , Triazoles/pharmacology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alanine/genetics , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Eating/drug effects , Eating/genetics , Female , Glycine/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pharmacogenomic Testing , Receptors, Opioid, mu/agonists , Young Adult
4.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 53(10): 1078-90, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23934621

ABSTRACT

The mu-opioid system has a key role in hedonic and motivational processes critical to substance addiction. However, existing mu-opioid antagonists have had limited success as anti-addiction treatments. GSK1521498 is a selective and potent mu-opioid antagonist being developed for the treatment of overeating and substance addictions. In this study, 28 healthy participants were administered single doses of GSK1521498 20 mg, ethanol 0.5 g/kg body weight, or both in combination, in a double blind placebo controlled four-way crossover design. The primary objective was to determine the risk of significant adverse pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions. The effects of GSK1521498 on hedonic and consummatory responses to alcohol and the attentional processing of alcohol-related stimuli, and their modulation by the OPRM1 A118G polymorphism were also explored. GSK1521498 20 mg was well tolerated alone and in combination with ethanol. There were mild transient effects of GSK1521498 on alertness and mood that were greater when it was combined with ethanol. These effects were not of clinical significance. There were no effects of GSK1521498 on reaction time, hedonic or consummatory responses. These findings provide encouraging safety and PK data to support continued development of GSK1521498 for the treatment of alcohol addiction.


Subject(s)
Ethanol/administration & dosage , Indans/administration & dosage , Triazoles/administration & dosage , Adult , Affect/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Drug Interactions , Ethanol/adverse effects , Ethanol/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Indans/adverse effects , Indans/pharmacokinetics , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Genetic , Receptors, Opioid, mu/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptors, Opioid, mu/genetics , Triazoles/adverse effects , Triazoles/pharmacokinetics , Young Adult
5.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 224(4): 501-9, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22752384

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Translational research implicates the mu opioid neurochemical system in hedonic processing, but its role in dissociable high-level cognitive functions is not well understood. Binge-eating represents a useful model of 'behavioural addiction' for exploring this issue. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to objectively assess the cognitive effects of a mu opioid receptor antagonist in obese individuals with binge-eating symptoms. METHODS: Adults with moderate to severe binge-eating and body mass index ≥30 kg/m² received 4 weeks of treatment with a mu opioid receptor antagonist (GSK1521498) 2 or 5 mg per day, or placebo, in a double-blind randomised parallel design. Neuropsychological assessment was undertaken at baseline and endpoint to quantify processing bias for food stimuli (visual dot probe with 500- and 2,000-ms stimulus presentations and food Stroop tasks) and other distinct cognitive functions (N-back working memory, sustained attention, and power of attention tasks). RESULTS: GSK1521498 5 mg/day significantly reduced attentional bias for food cues on the visual dot probe task versus placebo (p = 0.042), with no effects detected on other cognitive tasks (all p > 0.10). The effect on attentional bias was limited to the longer stimulus duration condition in the higher dose cohort alone. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support a central role for mu opioid receptors in aspects of attentional processing of food cues but militate against the notion of major modulatory influences of mu opioid receptors in working memory and sustained attention. The findings have implications for novel therapeutic directions and suggest that the role of different opioid receptors in cognition merits further research.


Subject(s)
Binge-Eating Disorder/drug therapy , Indans/pharmacology , Narcotic Antagonists/pharmacology , Receptors, Opioid, mu/antagonists & inhibitors , Triazoles/pharmacology , Adolescent , Adult , Attention , Binge-Eating Disorder/psychology , Cognition/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Indans/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Narcotic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Neuropsychological Tests , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Triazoles/administration & dosage , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...