ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT To assess the impact that educational interventions to improve inhaler techniques have on the clinical and functional control of asthma and COPD, we evaluated 44 participants before and after such an intervention. There was a significant decrease in the number of errors, and 20 patients (46%) significantly improved their technique regarding prior exhalation and breath hold. In the asthma group, there were significant improvements in the mean FEV1, FVC, and PEF (of 6.4%, 8.6%, and 8.3% respectively). Those improvements were accompanied by improvements in Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test scores but not in Asthma Control Test scores. In the COPD group, there were no significant variations. In asthma patients, educational interventions appear to improve inhaler technique, clinical control, and functional control.
RESUMO Para avaliar o impacto do ensino da técnica inalatória no controle clínico e funcional de pacientes com asma ou DPOC, incluíram-se 44 participantes antes e após essa intervenção. Houve uma diminuição significativa no número de erros cometidos, sendo que 20 pacientes (46%) melhoraram significativamente sua técnica na expiração prévia e apneia final. No grupo asma, houve significativa melhora nas médias de FEV1 (6,4%), CVF (8,6%) e PFE (8,3%), e essa melhora correlacionou-se com os resultados no Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test, mas não com os do Asthma Control Test. No grupo DPOC, não houve variações significativas. O ensino da técnica inalatória parece melhorar seu desempenho e os controles clínico e funcional em pacientes com asma.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Asthma/prevention & control , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/standards , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/prevention & control , Portugal , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Controlled Before-After StudiesABSTRACT
To assess the impact that educational interventions to improve inhaler techniques have on the clinical and functional control of asthma and COPD, we evaluated 44 participants before and after such an intervention. There was a significant decrease in the number of errors, and 20 patients (46%) significantly improved their technique regarding prior exhalation and breath hold. In the asthma group, there were significant improvements in the mean FEV1, FVC, and PEF (of 6.4%, 8.6%, and 8.3% respectively). Those improvements were accompanied by improvements in Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test scores but not in Asthma Control Test scores. In the COPD group, there were no significant variations. In asthma patients, educational interventions appear to improve inhaler technique, clinical control, and functional control. RESUMO Para avaliar o impacto do ensino da técnica inalatória no controle clínico e funcional de pacientes com asma ou DPOC, incluíram-se 44 participantes antes e após essa intervenção. Houve uma diminuição significativa no número de erros cometidos, sendo que 20 pacientes (46%) melhoraram significativamente sua técnica na expiração prévia e apneia final. No grupo asma, houve significativa melhora nas médias de FEV1 (6,4%), CVF (8,6%) e PFE (8,3%), e essa melhora correlacionou-se com os resultados no Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test, mas não com os do Asthma Control Test. No grupo DPOC, não houve variações significativas. O ensino da técnica inalatória parece melhorar seu desempenho e os controles clínico e funcional em pacientes com asma.
Subject(s)
Asthma/prevention & control , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/standards , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Controlled Before-After Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/standards , PortugalABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma affect almost 300 million individuals. Inhaled therapy is often associated with technical errors reducing efficacy and compliance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the inhalation technique and its relation with clinical and functional control in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analytical cross-sectional study including patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with any type of inhaler device. Demographic data and inquiry about previous teaching of inhalation technique were collected in all participants. Inhalation technique was evaluated in: Step 1 - device activation; Step 2 - previous expiration; Step 3 - inspiration; Step 4 - end inspiratory pause. Clinical control was assessed from the questionnaires Asthma Control Test, Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test, modified Medical Research Council and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test. Spirometric evaluation was performed in all participants. RESULTS: From a total of 62 subjects, 74.19% made at least one error, mainly during step 2 (53.2%). Previous education on inhalation technique was associated with lower number of errors (p = 0.014). There was no association between number of errors and age (p = 0.321), years of diagnosis (p = 0.119) or spirometric evaluation (p > 0.05). In asthma an association was found between number of errors and Asthma Control Test (p = 0.032) and Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (p = 0.008). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Teaching inhalation technique has a positive impact on its future performance. Most patients make mistakes, affecting clinical control in asthma, although in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease no relation was found. This is an ongoing work that aims to reevaluate inhalation technique after patients' education and its further impact.
Introdução: A doença pulmonar obstrutiva crónica e a asma afectam quase 300 milhões de indivíduos em todo o mundo. A terapêutica inalatória associa-se frequentemente a erros na técnica realizada reduzindo a eficácia e adesão.Objectivo: Avaliar a técnica inalatória e sua relação com o controlo clínico e funcional em asma e doença pulmonar obstrutiva crónica. Material e Métodos: Estudo transversal analítico incluindo doentes com asma e doença pulmonar obstrutiva crónica medicados com dispositivos inalatórios. Recolheram-se dados demográficos e existência de ensino prévio da técnica. Avaliou-se a técnica inalatória em: Passo 1 - expiração prévia; Passo 2 - activação do dispositivo; Passo 3 - inspiração; Passo 4 - apneia final. O controlo clínico avaliou-se com os questionários Asthma Control Test, Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test, modified Medical Research Council e Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test. Todos os participantes realizaram avaliação espirométrica. Resultados: Obtiveram-se 62 participantes, dos quais 74,19% cometeram pelo menos um erro na inalação, principalmente na expiração prévia (53,2%). A existência prévia de ensino da técnica associou-se a menor n'º de erros (p = 0,014). Não houve associação entre n'º de erros e idade (p = 0,321), n'º de anos de diagnóstico (p = 0,119) ou avaliação espirométrica (p > 0,05). Na asma encontrou-se associação entre menor número de erros e Asthma Control Test (p = 0,032) e Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (p = 0,008). Discussão e Conclusão: O ensino da técnica inalatória melhora o seu desempenho futuro. A maioria dos doentes comete erros afectando o controlo clínico na asma, apesar de na doença pulmonar obstrutiva crónica não se verificar nenhuma associação. Este trabalho encontra-se a decorrer procurando reavaliar os doentes após o ensino da técnica e verificar o seu impacto subsequente.
