Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Vasc Med ; 22(3): 234-244, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28494713

ABSTRACT

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now an accepted pathway for aortic valve replacement for patients who are at prohibitive, severe and intermediate risk for traditional aortic valve surgery. However, with this rising uptrend and adaptation of this new technology, vascular complications and their management remain an Achilles heel for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. The vascular complications are an independent predictor of mortality for patients undergoing TAVR. Early recognition of these complications and appropriate management is paramount. In this article, we review the most commonly encountered vascular complications associated with currently approved TAVR devices and their optimal percutaneous management techniques.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Vascular Diseases/epidemiology , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Humans , Incidence , Prosthesis Design , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Diseases/therapy
2.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 18(6): 462-470, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28455074

ABSTRACT

Development of membranous ventricular septal defects (VSD) is a rare complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacements (TAVR), and is recognized using intraoperative and postoperative imaging. We present two cases of this rare but serious complication; one was successfully managed conservatively and the other with valve-in-valve therapy. Management strategies for post-TAVR VSDs varies, but should be individualized to the clinical scenario. We performed a literature search and sought to identify various risk factors which may predispose patients to the development of VSD after TAVR.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Septal Defects, Ventricular/surgery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Humans , Risk Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods
3.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 10(1)2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28034845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Readmissions after cardiac procedures are common and contribute to increased healthcare utilization and costs. Data on 30-day readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing TAVR (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-CM codes 35.05 and 35.06) between January and November 2013 who survived the index hospitalization were identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Incidence, predictors, causes, and costs of 30-day readmissions were analyzed. Of 12 221 TAVR patients, 2188 (17.9%) were readmitted within 30 days. Length of stay >5 days during index hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.73), acute kidney injury (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05-1.44), >4 Elixhauser comorbidities (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03-1.46), transapical TAVR (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.39), chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39), chronic lung disease (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.34), and discharge to skilled nursing facility (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.34) were independent predictors of 30-day readmission. Readmissions were because of noncardiac causes in 61.8% of cases and because of cardiac causes in 38.2% of cases. Respiratory (14.7%), infections (12.8%), bleeding (7.6%), and peripheral vascular disease (4.3%) were the most common noncardiac causes, whereas heart failure (22.5%) and arrhythmias (6.6%) were the most common cardiac causes of readmission. Median length of stay and cost of readmissions were 4 days (interquartile range, 2-7 days) and $8302 (interquartile range, $5229-16 021), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-day readmissions after TAVR are frequent and are related to baseline comorbidities, TAVR access site, and post-procedure complications. Awareness of these predictors can help identify and target high-risk patients for interventions to reduce readmissions and costs.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Patient Readmission , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/economics , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Female , Hospital Costs , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Patient Discharge , Patient Readmission/economics , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Factors , Skilled Nursing Facilities , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/economics , Treatment Outcome , United States
4.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 17(6): 424-7, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27396606

ABSTRACT

History of prior coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) is a frequent scenario encountered in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis deemed inoperable and referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Aside from indices of frailty and other comorbidities, these patients remain at higher risk for peri-operative mortality and morbidity compared to their counterparts without prior CABG. Presence of concomitant peripheral arterial disease and patent left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft pose further access related challenges. We present a case of an 84-year-old female with prior CABG and severe PAD who underwent transapical TAVR for severe symptomatic AS sustaining an acute myocardial injury from damage to her apical epicardial collateral circulation. The case entails the importance of recognition of epicardial coronary collateralization where a transapical approach is best avoided or further aided by utilization of peri-procedural angiographic/fluoroscopy guidance to avoid epicardial vascular injury.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/therapy , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Medical Futility , Patient Selection , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Collateral Circulation , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Circulation , Electrocardiography , Fatal Outcome , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 87(7): 1201-2, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27310751

ABSTRACT

Total ischemic time (IT) and door-to-balloon time (DBT) are two important measures in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). IT is a better predictor of cardiovascular outcomes than DTB, including infarct size and mortality, in STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. IT should be adopted as a standard metric to measure quality of care in STEMI, and will help to promote improvements to our health care delivery system.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 17(4): 279-81, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27067863

ABSTRACT

The left atrial dissection is a very infrequently encountered complication after valve replacement and never seen after Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We present an 84-year-old female, who underwent successful transapical TAVR and consequently developed contained left atrial dissection seen on transesophageal echocardiogram. The patient remained stable throughout the procedure and was monitored in critical care unit with conservative management. Although there is low associated intraop mortality, prompt recognition is paramount with follow-up serial imaging.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm, False/etiology , Aortic Dissection/etiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/therapy , Aortic Valve , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Heart Aneurysm/etiology , Heart Injuries/etiology , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm, False/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Echocardiography, Doppler, Color , Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Female , Heart Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Heart Atria/diagnostic imaging , Heart Atria/injuries , Heart Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...