Effect of slow-release indapamide and perindopril compared with amlodipine on 24-hour blood pressure and left ventricular mass in hypertensive patients of African ancestry.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of hypertension in subjects of African origins, although hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is not as effective as calcium channel blockers, indapamide is superior to HCTZ. In the present study we therefore compared the effects of slow release (SR) indapamide with the calcium channel blocker amlodipine, when used as initial therapy, on blood pressure (BP) and left ventricular mass (LVM) during 6 months of treatment in this group. METHODS: Patients with a mean daytime ambulatory diastolic BP > or =90 mm Hg and < or =110 mm Hg (n = 125, aged 53 +/- 11 years, 68% women) were randomized to receive open-label 1.5 mg of indapamide SR or 5 mg of amlodipine. If daytime ambulatory diastolic BP at 1 month was >/=90 mm Hg, 4 mg of perindopril was added to indapamide SR or the dose of amlodipine was increased to 10 mg. RESULTS: After 1 month of therapy, there was an equivalent decline in systolic and diastolic BP in both groups (P <.0001). In the indapamide-treated group (n = 62) the daytime BP decreased from 153 +/- 12/101 +/- 6 mm Hg to 138 +/- 15/92 +/- 10 mm Hg and for amlodipine (n = 58), it decreased from 152 +/- 13/99 +/- 5 mm Hg to 138 +/- 12/91 +/- 8 mm Hg. At 6 months daytime ambulatory BP decreased to 130 +/- 15/86 +/- 8 mm Hg and to 129 +/- 11/85 +/- 5 mm Hg for the indapamide SR (n = 42) and amlodipine (n = 44) treatment groups, respectively. Both groups showed equivalent regression of LVM index and relative wall thickness. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in hypertensive patients of African ancestry initiating therapy with 1.5 mg of indapamide SR and then adding 4 mg of perindopril is equally as effective as amlodipine therapy at reducing BP, and modifying target organ damage.

Effect of low-dose perindopril/indapamide on albuminuria in diabetes: preterax in albuminuria regression: PREMIER.

Microalbuminuria in diabetes is a risk factor for early death and an indicator for aggressive blood pressure (BP) lowering. We compared a combination of 2 mg perindopril/0.625 mg indapamide with enalapril monotherapy on albumin excretion rate (AER) in patients with type 2 diabetes, albuminuria, and hypertension in a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group international multicenter study. Four hundred eighty-one patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension (systolic BP > or =140 mm Hg, <180 mm Hg, diastolic BP <110 mm Hg) were randomly assigned (age 59+/-9 years, 77% previously treated for hypertension). Results from 457 patients (intention-to-treat analysis) were available. After a 4-week placebo period, patients with albuminuria >20 and <500 microg/min were randomly assigned to a combination of 2 mg perindopril/0.625 mg indapamide or to 10 mg daily enalapril. After week 12, doses were adjusted on the basis of BP to a maximum of 8 mg perindopril/2.5 mg indapamide or 40 mg enalapril. The main outcome measures were overnight AER and supine BP. Both treatments reduced BP. Perindopril/indapamide treatment resulted in a statistically significant higher fall in both BP (-3.0 [95% CI -5.6, -0.4], P=0.012; systolic BP -1.5 [95% CI -3.0, -0.1] diastolic BP P=0.019) and AER -42% (95% CI -50%, -33%) versus -27% (95% CI -37%, -16%) with enalapril. The greater AER reduction remained significant after adjustment for mean BP. Adverse events were similar in the 2 groups. Thus, first-line treatment with low-dose combination perindopril/indapamide induces a greater decrease in albuminuria than enalapril, partially independent of BP reduction. A BP-independent effect of the combination may increase renal protection.

Comparison of indapamide and low-dose hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: To assess, using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), the antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg and indapamide 2.5 mg given as a monotherapy over 3 months to black patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. DESIGN: Single-centre, prospective, randomised open pilot study in three phases: (i) 1-week drug-free washout period; (ii) 2-week placebo run-in phase; and (iii) 3-month prospective open-label active treatment period. RESULTS: Forty-two black patients with mean daytime diastolic BP (DBP) > or = 90 mmHg and < or = 115 mmHg (mean age 57 +/- 11 years, 28 women/14 men) were enrolled into the study. Overall, a profound and sustained BP reduction was achieved with indapamide at 3 months (N = 20). The 24-hour BP decreased from 150 +/- 17/94 +/- 6 mmHg to 130 +/- 19/82 +/- 9 mmHg (P < 0.0001 for systolic BP (SBP) and DBP at 3 months versus baseline); the mean daytime BP decreased from 155 +/- 15/98 +/- 6 mmHg to 134 +/- 18/87 +/- 10 mmHg (P < 0.0001 for SBP and DBP at 3 months versus baseline). The overall control (mean daytime DBP < 90 mmHg) and response (decrease in daytime DBP > or = 10 mmHg) rates achieved with indapamide were 10/20 (50%) and 13/20 (65%), respectively. In contrast, monotherapy with hydrochlorothiazide resulted in more modest BP reduction and control and response rates at 3 months (N = 22). The 24-hour BP decreased from 147 +/- 14/94 +/- 7 mmHg to 139 +/- 19/88 +/- 2 mmHg (P < 0.05 for DBP at 3 months versus baseline, P = NS for SBP); the mean daytime BP decreased from 151 +/- 14/98 +/- 5 mmHg to 144 +/- 16/93 +/- 10 mmHg (P < 0.05 for DBP at 3 months versus baseline, P = NS for SBP). The corresponding control and response rates were 7/22 (32%) and 8/22 (36%). Both hydrocholorothiazide and indapamide caused significant hypokalaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with indapamide is associated with greater BP reduction and control and response rates than monotherapy with low-dose hydrochlorothiazide and may be an appropriate choice of antihypertensive diuretic therapy in black South African patients with mild to moderate hypertension.