Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eye (Lond) ; 25(6): 717-24, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21394115

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the agreement of the optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) device LENSTAR LS900 with partial coherence interferometry (PCI) device IOLMaster and applanation and immersion ultrasound biometry. METHODS: We conducted the study at the Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Malaya Medical Center, Malaysia. Phakic eyes of 76 consecutive cataract patients were measured using four different methods: IOLMaster, LENSTAR and A-scan applanation and immersion ultrasound biometry. We assessed the method agreement in the LENSTAR-IOLMaster, LENSTAR-applanation, and LENSTAR-immersion comparisons for axial length (AL) and intraocular lens (IOL) power using Bland-Altman plots. For average K, we compared LENSTAR with IOLMaster and the TOPCON KR-8100 autorefractor-keratometer. SRK/T formula was used to compute IOL power, with emmetropia as the target refractive outcome. RESULTS: For all the variables studied, LENSTAR agreement with IOLMaster is strongest, followed by those with immersion and applanation. For the LENSTAR-IOLMaster comparison, the estimated proportion of differences falling within 0.33 mm from zero AL and within 1D from zero IOL power is 100%. The estimated proportion of differences falling within 0.5 D from zero average K is almost 100% in the LENSTAR-IOLMaster comparison but 88% in the LENSTAR-TOPCON comparison. The proportion of differences falling within 0.10 mm (AL) and within 1D (IOL power) in the LENSTAR-IOLMaster comparison has practically significant discrepancy with that of LENSTAR-applanation and LENSTAR-immersion comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: In phakic eyes of cataract patients, measurements of AL, average K, and IOL power calculated using the SRK/T formula from LENSTAR are biometrically equivalent to those from IOLMaster, but not with those from applanation and immersion ultrasound biometry.


Subject(s)
Aphakia, Postcataract/physiopathology , Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological , Lenses, Intraocular , Optics and Photonics/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anterior Chamber/pathology , Axial Length, Eye , Biometry , Female , Humans , Interferometry/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
Trop Biomed ; 27(2): 254-64, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20962723

ABSTRACT

Three-dimensional (3D) models of the marginal hooks, dorsal and ventral anchors, bars and haptoral reservoirs of a parasite, Sundatrema langkawiense Lim & Gibson, 2009 (Monogenea) were developed using the polygonal modelling method in Autodesk 3ds Max (Version 9) based on two-dimensional (2D) illustrations. Maxscripts were written to rotate the modelled 3D structures. Appropriately orientated 3D haptoral hard-parts were then selected and positioned within the transparent 3D outline of the haptor and grouped together to form a complete 3D haptoral entity. This technique is an inexpensive tool for constructing 3D models from 2D illustrations for 3D visualisation of the spatial relationships between the different structural parts within organisms.


Subject(s)
Parasitology/methods , Software , Trematoda/anatomy & histology , Animals , Computer Simulation , Models, Structural
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...