Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
2.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 37(1): 65-72, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16247422

ABSTRACT

Although high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is superior to conventional chemotherapy for treatment of myeloma, most patients relapse and the time to relapse depends upon the initial prognostic factors. The administration of non-cross-resistant chemotherapies during the post-transplant period may delay or prevent relapse. We prospectively studied the role of consolidation chemotherapy (CC) after single autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (auto-PBSCT) in 103 mostly newly diagnosed myeloma patients (67 patients were < or =6 months from the initial treatment). Patients received conditioning with BCNU, melphalan+/-gemcitabine and auto-PBSCT followed by two cycles of the DCEP+/-G regimen (dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin+/-gemcitabine) at 3 and 9 months post-transplant and alternating with two cycles of DPP regimen (dexamethasone, cisplatin, paclitaxel) at 6 and 12 months post-transplant. With a median follow-up of 61.2 months, the median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) are 26 and 54.1 months, respectively. The 5-year EFS and OS are 23.1 and 42.5%, respectively. Overall, 51 (49.5%) patients finished all CC, suggesting that a major limitation of this approach is an inability to deliver all planned treatments. In order to improve results following autotransplantation, novel agents or immunologic approaches should be studied in the post-transplant setting.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Transplantation Conditioning , Adult , Aged , Cisplatin , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Cyclophosphamide , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Dexamethasone , Disease-Free Survival , Etoposide , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Male , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Myeloablative Agonists/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Transplantation, Autologous , Gemcitabine
3.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 34(10): 883-90, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15517008

ABSTRACT

Relapse remains a major cause of treatment failure after autotransplantation (auto-PBSCT) for Hodgkin's disease (HD). The administration of non-crossresistant therapies during the post-transplant period may delay or prevent relapse. We prospectively studied the role of consolidation chemotherapy (CC) after auto-PBSCT in 37 patients with relapsed or refractory HD. Patients received high-dose gemcitabine-BCNU-melphalan and auto-PBSCT followed by involved-field radiation and up to four cycles of the DCEP-G regimen, which consisted of dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin, gemcitabine given at 3 and 9 months post transplant alternating with a second regimen (DPP) of dexamethasone, cisplatin, paclitaxel at 6 and 12 months post transplant. The probabilities of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2.5 years were 59% (95% CI=42-76%) and 86% (95% CI=71-99%), respectively. In all, 17 patients received 54 courses of CC and 15 were surviving event free (2.5 years, EFS=87%). There were no treatment-related deaths during or after the CC phase. Post-transplant CC is feasible and well tolerated. The impact of this approach on EFS should be evaluated in a larger, randomized study.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Salvage Therapy/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Salvage Therapy/mortality , Secondary Prevention , Survival Analysis , Transplantation, Autologous , Gemcitabine
4.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 34(1): 69-76, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15133484

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study was to examine the yield of CD34(+) cells, response rates, and toxicity of high-dose cyclophosphamide with or without etoposide in patients with multiple myeloma. In total, 77 myeloma patients received either cyclophosphamide 4.5 g/m(2) (n=28) alone or with etoposide 2 g/m(2) (n=49) in a nonrandomized manner, followed by G-CSF 10 microg/kg/day for the purpose of stem cell mobilization. The effects of various factors on CD34(+) cell yield, response rate and engraftment were explored. A median of 22.39 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg were collected on the first day of leukapheresis (range 0.59-114.71 x 10(6)/kg) in 71 (92%) of patients. Greater marrow plasma cell infiltration (P=0.02) or prior radiation therapy (P=0.02) adversely affected CD34(+) cell yield. In total, 45% of patients receiving cyclophosphamide and 56% of those receiving cyclophosphamide/etoposide had at least a minimum response by EBMT criteria. In all, 25% of patients who received cyclophosphamide alone vs 75.5% of patients who received combined chemotherapy required hospitalization mainly for treatment of neutropenic fever. Cyclophosphamide alone is associated with impressive CD34(+) cell yields and clear antimyeloma activity. The addition of etoposide resulted in increased toxicity without significant improvement in CD34(+) cell yield or response rates.


Subject(s)
Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Adult , Aged , Antigens, CD34/analysis , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/toxicity , Cyclophosphamide/toxicity , Etoposide/toxicity , Female , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/standards , Humans , Leukapheresis/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
5.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 33(8): 781-7, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14767498

ABSTRACT

High-dose chemotherapy using melphalan (HDMEL) is an important component of many conditioning regimens that are given before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). In contrast to the situation in myeloma, and to a lesser degree acute leukemia, only a very limited published experience exists with the use of HDMEL conditioning as a single agent in doses requiring AHSCT for lymphoma, both Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and especially non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Thus, we report results of treating 26 lymphoma patients (22 with NHL and four with HL) with HDMEL 220-300 mg/m(2) plus amifostine (AF) cytoprotection and AHSCT as part of a phase I-II trial. Median age was 51 years (range 24-62 years); NHL histology was varied, but was aggressive (including transformed from indolent) in 19 patients, indolent in two patients and mantle cell in one. All 26 patients had been extensively treated; 11 were refractory to the immediate prior therapy on protocol entry and two had undergone prior AHSCT. All were deemed ineligible for other, 'first-line' AHSCT regimens. Of these 26 patients, 22 survived to initial tumor evaluation on D +100. At this time, 13 were in complete remission, including four patients who were in second CR before HDMEL+AF+AHSCT. Responses occurred at all HDMEL doses. Currently, seven patients are alive, including five without progression, with a median follow-up in these latter patients of D +1163 (range D +824 to D +1630); one of these patients had a nonmyeloablative allograft as consolidation on D +106. Conversely, 14 patients relapsed or progressed, including five who had previously achieved CR with the AHSCT procedure. Two patients, both with HL, remain alive after progression; one is in CR following salvage radiotherapy. Six patients died due to nonrelapse causes, including two NHL patients who died while in CR. We conclude that HDMEL+AF+AHSCT has significant single-agent activity in relapsed or refractory NHL and HL. This experience may be used as a starting point for subsequent dose escalation of HDMEL (probably with AF) in established combination regimens.


Subject(s)
Amifostine/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/therapy , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Radiation-Protective Agents/administration & dosage , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation, Autologous
6.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 31(10): 851-5, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12748660

ABSTRACT

We evaluated 120 leukapheresis procedures (93 patients), in order to detect clinical factors that influence the efficiency of CD34+ collection using Cobe Spectra trade mark cell separators. Hematocrit was >27% and platelet count >30 000/microl in >95% of patients. Platelet transfusions were given if the postprocedure count was &<20 000/microl. Multiple regression analysis was used to analyze putative factors, and a predictive equation defined by stepwise regression modeling. The mean efficiency was 0.59 (s.d. 0.27). Sex (M>F; P=0.01), the volume processed (inversely; P=0.01) and CD34+ cell count (inversely; P=0.04) were associated with efficiency, whereas hematocrit, platelet or leukocyte count, catheter type and patient weight were not. The effect size for predictive factors was small (R(2)=0.21). Adverse events were limited to hypocalcemia. We conclude that female sex, volume processed and CD34+ cell count adversely influence the efficiency of CD34+ cell leukapheresis. However, the impact of volume and CD34+ cell count is small, and likely to be offset by the influence of these same factors on overall yield. Leukapheresis appears to be safe and efficient for autologous blood and marrow transplantation patients with hematocrit >27% and platelet count >30 000/microl.


Subject(s)
Antigens, CD34/blood , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Leukapheresis/methods , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , CD4 Antigens/blood , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Female , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Hematocrit , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods , Humans , Male , Platelet Count , Recombinant Proteins , Reproducibility of Results , Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
7.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 29(4): 303-12, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11896427

ABSTRACT

Disease relapse occurs in 50% or more of patients who are autografted for relapsed or refractory lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD). The administration of non-cross-resistant therapies during the post-transplant phase could possibly control residual disease and delay or prevent its progression. To test this approach, 55 patients with relapsed/refractory or high-risk NHL or relapsed/refractory HD were enrolled in the following protocol: stem cell mobilization: cyclophosphamide (4.5 g/m(2)) + etoposide (2.0 g/m(2)) followed by GM-CSF or G-CSF; high-dose therapy: gemcitabine (1.0 g/m(2)) on day -5, BCNU (300 mg/m(2)) + gemcitabine (1.0 g/m(2)) on day -2, melphalan (140 mg/m(2)) on day -1, blood stem cell infusion on day 0; post-transplant immunotherapy (B cell NHL): rituxan (375 mg/m(2)) weekly for 4 weeks + GM-CSF (250 microg thrice weekly) (weeks 4-8); post-transplant involved-field radiotherapy (HD): 30-40 Gy to pre-transplant areas of disease (weeks 4-8); post-transplant consolidation chemotherapy (all patients): dexamethasone (40 mg daily)/cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m(2)/day)/etoposide (30 mg/m(2)/day)/cisplatin (15 mg/m(2)/day) by continuous intravenous infusion for 4 days + gemcitabine (1.0 g/m(2), day 3) (months 3 + 9) alternating with dexamethasone/paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2))/cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) (months 6 + 12). Of the 33 patients with B cell lymphoma, 14 had primary refractory disease (42%), 12 had relapsed disease (36%) and seven had high-risk disease in first CR (21%). For the entire group, the 2-year Kaplan-Meier event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 30% and 35%, respectively, while six of 33 patients (18%) died before day 100 from transplant-related complications. The rituxan/GM-CSF phase was well-tolerated by the 26 patients who were treated and led to radiographic responses in seven patients; an eighth patient with a blastic variant of mantle-cell lymphoma had clearance of marrow involvement after rituxan/GM-CSF. Of the 22 patients with relapsed/refractory HD (21 patients) or high-risk T cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (one patient), the 2-year Kaplan-Meier EFS and OS were 70% and 85%, respectively, while two of 22 patients (9%) died before day 100 from transplant-related complications. Eight patients received involved field radiation and seven had radiographic responses within the treatment fields. A total of 72 courses of post-transplant consolidation chemotherapy were administered to 26 of the 55 total patients. Transient grade 3-4 myelosuppression was common and one patient died from neutropenic sepsis, but no patients required an infusion of backup stem cells. After adjustment for known prognostic factors, the EFS for the cohort of HD patients was significantly better than the EFS for an historical cohort of HD patients autografted after BEAC (BCNU/etoposide/cytarabine/cyclophosphamide) without consolidation chemotherapy (P = 0.015). In conclusion, post-transplant consolidation therapy is feasible and well-tolerated for patients autografted for aggressive NHL and HD and may be associated with improved progression-free survival particularly for patients with HD.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/therapy , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy , Hodgkin Disease/pathology , Hodgkin Disease/radiotherapy , Humans , Immunotherapy , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/pathology , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/radiotherapy , Male , Middle Aged , Rituximab , Transplantation, Autologous
8.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 42(5): 1125-31, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11697632

ABSTRACT

An increased incidence of intermediate to high-grade Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma is found in individuals with AIDS. Although immune function in AIDS patients can be improved through the use of antiretroviral therapy, the contribution of these drugs to lymphoma regression is not known. Here we describe the complete regression and subsequent recurrence of high grade, Burkitt-like lymphoma during antiretroviral therapy in a patient with AIDS. Antiretroviral therapy resulted in diminished viral load and modest improvement in CD4+ T cell counts. Lymphoma regressed initially, but relapsed 3 months later. Tissue taken from the initial and recurrent tumor demonstrated different clonal rearrangements. The recurrent lymphoma did not respond to continued antiretroviral therapy. In Conclusion, antiretroviral therapy may contribute to lymphoma regression in AIDS lymphoma. Clinically recurrent disease may be clonally distinct.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Lymphoma, AIDS-Related/drug therapy , Lymphoma, AIDS-Related/pathology , Adult , Burkitt Lymphoma , Clone Cells/pathology , Humans , Lymphoma, B-Cell/drug therapy , Lymphoma, B-Cell/pathology , Male , Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology , Recurrence , Remission Induction
9.
Oncology (Williston Park) ; 14(5): 659-66, 671-2; discussion 672-7, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10853459

ABSTRACT

Several recent studies have addressed the management of infectious problems in patients with acute leukemia. Although those studies have served to emphasize the fundamental management principles formulated and proven almost 30 years ago, they have also contributed important new insights. This article describes recent developments in the management of infectious illnesses in patients who are neutropenic due to leukemia or its treatment. The discussion will focus on the increasing armamentarium of antimicrobial drugs and adjunctive agents. These expanding therapeutic options must be viewed in the context of newly emerging resistant organisms and special problems, such as the increased use of indwelling venous catheters.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Leukemia/drug therapy , Neutropenia/complications , Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Acute Disease , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Mycoses/drug therapy , Mycoses/prevention & control , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Opportunistic Infections/etiology
10.
Clin Lab Med ; 20(1): 71-81, ix, 2000 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10702897

ABSTRACT

Acute leukemias that arise as a result of treatment with DNA-damaging agents exhibit distinctive molecular, genetic, and clinico-pathologic features. In this timely article, the authors dissect the pathogenetic basis of therapy-related leukemias, elucidating important molecular mechanisms through which DNA damage causes these disorders. The authors also discuss how these molecular aberrations translate into specific clinical syndromes, and in addition, point out potential molecular targets for the development of innovative treatment approaches.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/etiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/etiology , Chromosome Deletion , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/etiology , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/etiology , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/genetics , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Neoplasms, Second Primary/genetics , Neoplasms, Second Primary/therapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/genetics , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Translocation, Genetic
12.
Semin Oncol Nurs ; 14(4): 256-61, 1998 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9839338

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To review the current state of knowledge of the molecular biology of lymphoma, the clinical relevance of findings, and the implications for practice. DATA SOURCES: Published research articles, proceedings of conferences, and oncology textbooks. CONCLUSIONS: The molecular biology of lymphomas has been the subject of many research studies in the past two decades. New cytogenetic techniques have led to a wealth of information on lymphomagenesis and its impact on the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of lymphoma, which will continue into the next decade. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: An understanding of the molecular biology of lymphoma will assist cancer nurses in providing current, state-of-the-art patient education and will facilitate an understanding of newly developed methods in the prognosis and treatment of this malignancy.


Subject(s)
Lymphoma/physiopathology , Humans , Lymphoma/nursing , Molecular Biology , Oncology Nursing
13.
Transfusion ; 38(3): 229-35, 1998 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9563401

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of platelet transfusion reactions may depend partly on the length of storage. The influence of reactions on the effectiveness of platelet transfusions is not known. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Platelet transfusion reactions, identified by prospective monitoring, were analyzed for the effects of component type, recipient lymphocytotoxic antibodies, bacterial contamination, and duration of storage. Posttransfusion corrected count increments (CCIs) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of transfusions associated with reactions by comparing them to those of randomly selected transfusions without reactions. RESULTS: Reactions accompanied 4 percent of the 4926 transfusions given and included 119 febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions, 62 allergic reactions, and 13 reactions with features of both. Platelet concentrates contained a mean of 0.5 x 10(8) white cells per unit. Lymphocytotoxic antibodies were detectable in 20 of 84 recipients tested proximate to a reaction. Bacterial cultures from 4 of 81 units were positive; 1 unit was associated with fatal Enterobacter sp. sepsis. The incidence of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions but not allergic reactions was related to platelet storage duration. The CCI was not significantly different for transfusions associated with reactions (10.97 [median, range 0-72.5; n = 165]) or not so associated (13.1 [median, range 0-39.5; n = 174]) (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The incidence of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions but not allergic reactions appears to be related to the duration of platelet storage. Transfusion reactions may not have an adverse impact on the effectiveness of platelet transfusions.


Subject(s)
Blood Preservation , Platelet Transfusion/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Antilymphocyte Serum/immunology , Bacterial Infections/etiology , Female , Fever , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Male , Platelet Count , Platelet Transfusion/methods , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
14.
Curr Opin Hematol ; 3(5): 347-54, 1996 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9372100

ABSTRACT

Advances in platelet transfusion have contributed to improved outcomes in the treatment of patients with cancer and leukemia. However, the optimal strategies to avoid some of the side effects that could result from platelet transfusions remain under investigation. These side effects include the development of refractoriness to transfusions, alloimmunization, transfusion reactions, the transmission of infectious agents, and transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease. Leukodepletion by filtration is promising as a means of preventing the development of alloimmunization. Results of the Trial to Reduce Alloimmunization to Platelets will be reported shortly and will shed more light on that issue. Bedside filtration of cellular blood products also diminishes the transmission of cytomegalovirus infections by that route. Transfusion reactions are often mediated by cytokines in the plasma fraction of transfused platelet concentrates, and leukodepletion prior to storage reduces their incidence. Serious bacterial infections are sometimes transmitted by platelet transfusions and improved methods are needed for their detection and prevention. Photochemical methods that could inactivate bacteria and viruses in contaminated products deserve further study.


Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/therapy , Platelet Transfusion , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...