ABSTRACT
Many signal transduction inhibitors are being developed for cancer therapy target pathways that are also important for the proper function of antitumor lymphocytes, possibly weakening their therapeutic effects. Here we show that most inhibitors targeting multiple signaling pathways have especially strong negative effects on T-cell activation at their active doses on cancer cells. In particular, we found that recently approved MEK inhibitors displayed potent suppressive effects on T cells in vitro However, these effects could be attenuated by certain cytokines that can be administered to cancer patients. Among them, clinically available IL15 superagonists, which can activate PI3K selectively in T lymphocytes, synergized with MEK inhibitors in vivo to elicit potent and durable antitumor responses, including by a vaccine-like effect that generated resistance to tumor rechallenge. Our work identifies a clinically actionable approach to overcome the T-cell-suppressive effects of MEK inhibitors and illustrates how to reconcile the deficiencies of signal transduction inhibitors, which impede desired immunologic effects in vivo Cancer Res; 76(9); 2561-72. ©2016 AACR.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , Lymphocyte Activation/drug effects , Neoplasms, Experimental/pathology , Proteins/pharmacology , Animals , Blotting, Western , Cell Line, Tumor , Flow Cytometry , High-Throughput Screening Assays , Humans , Interleukin-15 , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Transgenic , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Pyridones/pharmacology , Pyrimidinones/pharmacology , Recombinant Fusion Proteins , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABSTRACT
Tumor-reactive T cells become unresponsive in advanced tumors. Here we have characterized a common mechanism of T cell unresponsiveness in cancer driven by the upregulation of the transcription factor Forkhead box protein P1 (Foxp1), which prevents CD8⺠T cells from proliferating and upregulating Granzyme-B and interferon-γ in response to tumor antigens. Accordingly, Foxp1-deficient lymphocytes induced rejection of incurable tumors and promoted protection against tumor rechallenge. Mechanistically, Foxp1 interacted with the transcription factors Smad2 and Smad3 in preactivated CD8⺠T cells in response to microenvironmental transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß), and was essential for its suppressive activity. Therefore, Smad2 and Smad3-mediated c-Myc repression requires Foxp1 expression in T cells. Furthermore, Foxp1 directly mediated TGF-ß-induced c-Jun transcriptional repression, which abrogated T cell activity. Our results unveil a fundamental mechanism of T cell unresponsiveness different from anergy or exhaustion, driven by TGF-ß signaling on tumor-associated lymphocytes undergoing Foxp1-dependent transcriptional regulation.
