ABSTRACT
With immunohistochemical (IHC) staining increasingly being used to guide clinical decisions, variability in staining quality and reproducibility are becoming essential factors in generating diagnoses using IHC tissue preparations. The current study tested a method to track and quantify the interrun, intrarun, and intersite variability of IHC staining intensity. Our hypothesis was that staining precision between laboratory sites, staining runs, and individual slides may be verified quantitatively, efficiently and effectively utilizing algorithm-based, automated image analysis. To investigate this premise, we tested the consistency of IHC staining in 40 routinely processed (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) human tissues using 10 common antibiomarker antibodies on 2 Dako Omnis instruments at 2 locations (Carpinteria, CA: 30 m above sea level and Longmont, CO: 1500 m above sea level) programmed with identical, default settings and sample pretreatments. Digital images of IHC-labeled sections produced by a whole slide scanner were analyzed by a simple commercially available algorithm and compared with a board-certified veterinary pathologist's semiquantitative scoring of staining intensity. The image analysis output correlated well with pathology scores but had increased sensitivity for discriminating subtle variations and providing reproducible digital quantification across sites as well as within and among staining runs at the same site. Taken together, our data indicate that digital image analysis offers an objective and quantifiable means of verifying IHC staining parameters as a part of laboratory quality assurance systems.
