Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Oncol ; 24(9): 2402-8, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23723295

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel significantly improves overall survival (OS) versus mitoxantrone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel failure. We examined patient survival at 2 years and tumour-related pain with cabazitaxel versus mitoxantrone. METHODS: Updated TROPIC data (cut-off 10 March 2010) were used to compare 2-year survival between treatment groups and assess patient demographics and disease characteristics. Factors prognostic for survival ≥2 years were assessed. Pain and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were evaluated in the overall patient population. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 25.5 months. After 2 years, more patients remained alive following cabazitaxel than mitoxantrone [odds ratio 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-3.33]. Treatment with cabazitaxel was prognostic for survival ≥2 years. Demographics/baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms irrespective of survival. Pain at baseline and pain response were comparable between treatment groups. Average daily pain performance index was lower for cabazitaxel versus mitoxantrone (all cycles; 95% CI -0.27 to -0.01; P = 0.035) and analgesic scores were similar. Grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathies were uncommon and comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cabazitaxel prolongs OS at 2 years versus mitoxantrone and has low rates of peripheral neuropathy. Palliation benefits of cabazitaxel were comparable to those of mitoxantrone. The study was registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00417079).


Subject(s)
Mitoxantrone/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Taxoids/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Docetaxel , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis/drug therapy , Pain/complications , Pain Measurement , Palliative Care , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/mortality , Quality of Life , Survival , Survival Rate , Taxoids/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
Urology ; 58(1): 53-8, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11445479

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of bicalutamide in patients with advanced prostate cancer with progression after conventional hormonal therapy. METHODS: Fifty-two patients received bicalutamide, 150 mg once daily, as second-line therapy after progressing following treatment with orchiectomy or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue or diethylstilbestrol, alone or in combination. Patients had measurable (n = 8) or assessable (n = 44) disease, a Southwest Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, and no prior antiandrogen therapy or chemotherapy. The objective response to treatment was assessed every 12 weeks; symptoms and pain were assessed monthly with questionnaires for 6 months. RESULTS: There was evidence of palliation with three measures of pain and, to a lesser extent, with a measure of overall symptom status after 3 months of taking bicalutamide. No complete or partial responses occurred. However, 9 (20%) of 44 subjects with adequate prostate-specific antigen data had a 50% or higher decrease in their prostate-specific antigen levels, which did not correlate with symptom improvement. The median survival time was 15 months. The most common side effects were hot flashes (23%) and nausea (21%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that bicalutamide decreases pain and improves symptom status in patients with prostate cancer in whom first-line hormonal therapy failed.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Anilides/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anilides/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Diethylstilbestrol/administration & dosage , Disease Progression , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nitriles , Orchiectomy , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Palliative Care , Prostate-Specific Antigen/analysis , Quality of Life , Tosyl Compounds , Treatment Outcome
3.
Arch Intern Med ; 154(9): 1023-5, 1994 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8179445

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The administration of aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisone is a second-line hormonal maneuver commonly prescribed for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. We determine the incidence of aminoglutethimide-induced primary hypothyroidism in an elderly population who have prostate cancer. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine men with stage D2 prostate cancer who were treated at the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md, in 1992. RESULTS: Clinical and biochemical evidence of hypothyroidism (thyrotropin levels greater than 10 mU/L) was noted in nine of 29 patients treated following the initiation of aminoglutethimide (250 mg four times daily). The elevation in thyrotropin and the clinical symptoms of hypothyroidism were reversed by the administration of levothyroxine (n = 4). CONCLUSION: Hypothyroidism should be included in the differential diagnosis of lethargy in elderly patients who are receiving aminoglutethimide for prostate cancer. Furthermore, patients who are receiving this agent at a dosage of 1000 mg/d or greater should have their serum thyrotropin levels monitored, and replacement therapy with levothyroxine should be initiated when abnormally elevated levels are noted.


Subject(s)
Aminoglutethimide/adverse effects , Hypothyroidism/chemically induced , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Aminoglutethimide/therapeutic use , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Hypothyroidism/blood , Hypothyroidism/diagnosis , Male , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Thyrotropin/blood
4.
Cancer Res ; 54(7): 1690-4, 1994 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8137283

ABSTRACT

Phenylacetate has recently been shown to suppress tumor growth and promote differentiation in experimental models. A phase I trial of phenylacetate was conducted in 17 patients with advanced solid tumors. Each patient received a single i.v. bolus dose followed by a 14-day continuous i.v. infusion of the drug. Twenty-one cycles of therapy were administered at four dose levels, achieved by increasing the rate of the continuous i.v. infusion. Phenylacetate displayed nonlinear pharmacokinetics [Km = 105.1 +/- 44.5 (SD) microgram/ml, Vmax = 24.1 +/- 5.2 mg/kg/h and Vd = 19.2 +/- 3.3 L]. There was also evidence for induction of drug clearance. Ninety-nine % of phenylacetate elimination was accounted for by conversion to phenylacetylglutamine, which was excreted in the urine. Continuous i.v. infusion rates resulting in serum phenylacetate concentrations exceeding Km often resulted in rapid drug accumulation and dose-limiting toxicity, which consisted of reversible central nervous system depression, preceded by emesis. Three of nine patients with metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer maintained stable prostatic specific antigen levels for more than 2 months; another had less bone pain. One of six patients with glioblastoma multiforme, whose steroid dosage has remained unchanged for the duration of therapy, has sustained functional improvement for more than 9 months. The use of adaptive control with feedback for the dosing of each patient enabled us to safely maintain stable phenylacetate concentrations up to the range of 200-300 micrograms/ml, which resulted in clinical improvement in some patients with advanced disease.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Phenylacetates/pharmacokinetics , Phenylacetates/toxicity , Adult , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/pathology , Glutamine/blood , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/blood , Neoplasms/pathology , Phenylacetates/blood
5.
Pharmacotherapy ; 13(6): 656-7, 1993.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8302692

ABSTRACT

Suramin, a drug used to treat parasitic diseases, is currently being investigated as a treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. A 73-year-old man had an anaphylactoid reaction following the first dose of suramin. It was treated successfully with epinephrine, diphenhydramine, and hydrocortisone. Investigators should be aware of the possibility of such a reaction with parenteral administration of this drug.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Suramin/adverse effects , Aged , Humans , Infusions, Parenteral , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Suramin/administration & dosage
6.
Blood ; 81(2): 482-9, 1993 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8380727

ABSTRACT

One of the differences between acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is their sensitivity to vincristine. Although vincristine plays an important role in chemotherapeutic regimens for ALL, it does not possess clinically significant activity in AML. Horseradish peroxidase, a heme-centered peroxidase, oxidatively degrades Vinca derivatives and thereby abrogates their cytotoxic activity. This finding suggested that myeloperoxidase (MPO), a heme-centered peroxidase characteristically found in AML and not in ALL, might also degrade vincristine. We first examined the effects of MPO on vincristine in a cell-free system and demonstrated that this enzyme is capable of catalyzing vincristine's oxidative breakdown. We also observed that vincristine is more rapidly degraded in tissue culture by MPO-positive HL-60 cells than by a MPO-negative HL-60 subclone. The degree of MPO activity in these cell lines correlated in a positive manner with their degree of resistance to vincristine's cytotoxic activity. Moreover, the differential resistance to vincristine observed between these cell lines could be increased by increasing the concentration of H2O2 available to the enzyme. These data support the hypothesis that MPO-mediated oxidation of vincristine accounts in part for this drug's lack of activity in AML.


Subject(s)
Cytoplasmic Granules/enzymology , Drug Resistance/physiology , Peroxidase/metabolism , Vincristine/metabolism , Vincristine/pharmacology , Antigens, Surface/analysis , Cytoplasmic Granules/ultrastructure , Humans , Kinetics , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute , Peroxidase/analysis , Phenotype , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Tumor Cells, Cultured
7.
Endocrinology ; 128(4): 2027-35, 1991 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2004615

ABSTRACT

GH-releasing peptide (His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-Lys-NH2 or GHRP) releases GH by a unique and complementary dual site of action on the hypothalamus and pituitary. These effects are mediated via non-GH-releasing hormone (non-GHRH) and nonopiate receptors in rats. Select types of opiates are known to release GH by a hypothalamic site of action, and thus, the dermorphin heptapeptide and benzomorphan opiate agonist 2549 used in this study presumably act on the hypothalamus to release GH. Neither dermorphin nor 2549 released GH or augmented the GH responses of GHRP or GHRH in vitro by a direct pituitary action, while GHRH antiserum inhibited the GH response of both dermorphin and 2549 in vivo. Evidence indicates that these opiates and GHRP administered together synergistically release GH, demonstrating the independent action(s) of GHRP and the opiates. Present data indicate that one of the major differences in the actions of dermorphin, 2549, and GHRP is the inhibition of somatostatin (SRIF) release by the opiates but not by GHRP. Although the actions of dermorphin, 2549, and GHRP on GH release are GHRH dependent, release of endogenous GHRH does not explain how GH is released synergistically by the combination of these peptides. It is proposed that dermorphin/2549 synergistically release GH with GHRP or GHRH because these opiates inhibit SRIF release. Since the GHRP plus GHRH synergistic GH release was not explained by inhibition of SRIF or stimulation of GHRH, an alternative mechanism is proposed to explain how GHRP synergistically release GH in combination with GHRH. The complementary, rather dramatic synergistic interaction of GHRP, GHRH, and dermorphin or GHRP, GHRH, and 2549 in releasing GH again strongly supports the independent actions of these compounds.


Subject(s)
Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone/pharmacology , Oligopeptides/pharmacology , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Benzomorphans/administration & dosage , Benzomorphans/pharmacology , Cells, Cultured , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Synergism , Growth Hormone/metabolism , Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone/administration & dosage , Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone/antagonists & inhibitors , Hypothalamus/drug effects , Hypothalamus/physiology , Molecular Sequence Data , Oligopeptides/administration & dosage , Oligopeptides/antagonists & inhibitors , Opioid Peptides , Pituitary Gland, Anterior/drug effects , Pituitary Gland, Anterior/metabolism , Rats
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...