Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 880678, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35498798

ABSTRACT

Hypertensive emergency is a life-threatening condition associated with severe hypertension and organ damage, such as neurological, renal or cardiac dysfunction. The most recent guidelines on pediatric hypertension, the 2016 European guidelines and the 2017 American guidelines, provide recommendations on the management of hypertensive emergencies, however in pediatric age robust literature is lacking and the available evidence often derives from studies conducted in adults. We reviewed PubMed and Cochrane Library from January 2017 to July 2021, using the following search terms: "hypertension" AND "treatment" AND ("emergency" OR "urgency") to identify the studies. Five studies were analyzed, according to our including criteria. According to the articles reviewed in this work, beta-blockers seem to be safe and effective in hypertensive crises, more than sodium nitroprusside, although limited data are available. Indeed, calcium-channel blockers seem to be effective and safe, in particular the use of clevidipine during the neonatal age, although limited studies are available. However, further studies should be warranted to define a univocal approach to pediatric hypertensive emergencies.

2.
J Neurol ; 269(4): 2193-2199, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34820736

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Injections targeting the occipital nerve are used to reduce headache attacks and abort cluster bouts in cluster headache patients. There is no widely accepted agreement over the optimal technique of injection, type and doses of steroids and/or anesthetics to use, as well as injection regimens. The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness and safety of greater occipital nerve long-acting steroid injections in the management of episodic and chronic cluster headache. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study on episodic (ECH) and chronic cluster headache patients (CCH). ECH were included in the study at the beginning of a cluster period. Three injections with 60 mg methylprednisolone were performed on alternate days. We registered the frequency and intensity of attacks three days before and 3, 7 and 30 days after the treatment, the latency of cluster relapse, adverse events, scores evaluating anxiety (Zung scale), depression (Beck's Depression Scale) and quality of life (Disability Assessment Schedule II, 12-Item Self-Administered Version). Primary outcome was the interruption of the cluster after the three injections. Responders conducted a follow-up period of 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 60 patients, 47 with ECH and 13 with CCH. We observed a complete response in 47.8% (22/46) of episodic and 33.3% (4/12) of chronic patients. Moreover, a partial response (reduction of at least 50% of attacks) was obtained in further 10.8% (5/46) of episodic and in 33.3% (4/12) of chronic patients at 1 month. Median pain-free period was of 3 months for CCH responders. Only mild adverse events were reported in 38.3% (23/58) cases. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest three greater occipital nerve injections of 60 mg methylprednisolone on alternate days as useful therapy in episodic and chronic cluster headache. This leads to a long pain-free period in chronic forms. Adverse effects are mild and support its use as first choice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was inserted in AIFA observational studies register.


Subject(s)
Cluster Headache , Cluster Headache/drug therapy , Humans , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Steroids/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab ; 34(9): 1089-1093, 2021 Sep 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34171940

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Our study aims to assess the impact of lockdown during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on glycemic control and psychological well-being in youths with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: We compared glycemic metrics during lockdown with the same period of 2019. The psychological impact was evaluated with the Test of Anxiety and Depression. RESULTS: We analyzed metrics of 117 adolescents (87% on Multiple Daily Injections and 100% were flash glucose monitoring/continuous glucose monitoring users). During the lockdown, we observed an increase of the percentage of time in range (TIR) (p<0.001), with a significant reduction of time in moderate (p=0.002), and severe hypoglycemia (p=0.001), as well as the percentage of time in hyperglycemia (p<0.001). Glucose variability did not differ (p=0.863). The glucose management indicator was lower (p=0.001). 7% of youths reached the threshold-score (≥115) for anxiety and 16% for depression. A higher score was associated with lower TIR [p=0.028, p=0.012]. CONCLUSIONS: Glycemic control improved during the first lockdown period with respect to the previous year. Symptoms of depression and anxiety were associated with worse glycemic control; future researches are necessary to establish if this improvement is transient and if psychological difficulties will increase during the prolonged pandemic situation.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/psychology , Glycemic Control , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Child , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
5.
Lab Med ; 45(3): e105-8, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25157090

ABSTRACT

PATIENT: 78-year-old African-American man. PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia first diagnosed in 2003, with a subsequent relapse in 2006 and another in 2010. HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: In late 2011, the patient was admitted to the hospital for cholelithiasis, at which time his treating physician incidentally discovered severe anemia. The anemia worsened as time went on, and the patient became transfusion dependent. Hypogammaglobulinemia secondary to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) required that the patient receive intravenous immunoglobulin. Despite transfusion therapy, the anemia failed to lessen; laboratory results eventually led to the diagnosis of a drug-induced warm autoantibody that triggered hemolytic anemia. MEDICATIONS: The patient had taken rituximab in 2003; rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, oncovin, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in 2006; fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in 2010; and intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) and prednisone in 2011.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune/chemically induced , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Black or African American , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Aged , Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune/therapy , Blood Transfusion , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...