ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis (HD) patients have a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors as well as cognitive impairment. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the interrelationship between cognitive impairment, endothelium-related biomarkers and cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular mortality. METHODS: A total of 216 outpatients were recruited from three centres in a dialysis network in Brazil between June 2016 and June 2019. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained by applying a patient questionnaire, reviewing medical records data and conducting patient interviews. Cognitive function was assessed using the Cambridge Cognitive Examination. Plasma endothelium-related biomarkers [syndecan-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion protein-1 (VCAM-1) and angiopoietin-2 (AGPT2)] were measured. Patients were followed for 30 months. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the associations of the cognitive function scores and each endothelium-related biomarker with cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular mortality. RESULTS: Cognitive function was associated with cardiovascular mortality {each standard deviation [SD] better cognitive score was associated with a 69% lower risk for cardiovascular mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.31 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.58]} but not with non-cardiovascular mortality. Moreover, cognitive function was also correlated with all endothelial-related biomarkers, except VCAM-1. ICAM-1, AGPT2 and syndecan-1 were also associated with cardiovascular mortality. The association between cognitive function and cardiovascular mortality remained significant with no HR value attenuation [fully adjusted HR 0.32 (95% CI 0.16-0.59)] after individually including each endothelial-related biomarker in the Cox model. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, cognitive impairment was associated with several endothelium-related biomarkers. Moreover, cognitive impairment was associated with cardiovascular mortality but not with non-cardiovascular mortality, and the association between cognitive impairment and cardiovascular mortality in HD patients was not explained by any of the endothelial-related biomarkers.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cognitive Dysfunction/mortality , Endothelium, Vascular/pathology , Renal Dialysis/mortality , Angiopoietin-2/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/blood , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Endothelium, Vascular/metabolism , Female , Humans , Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Survival Rate , Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1/bloodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Expanded clinical and surgical techniques in liver transplantation can markedly improve patient and graft survival. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative portocaval shunts in liver transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Searches were conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases, and updated in January 2018. The following specific outcomes of interest were defined and evaluated separated using 2 different reviews and meta-analyses for 1) hemi-portocaval shunt (HPCS) and 2) temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS). Comparative studies were analyzed separately for both surgical portocaval shunt modalities. RESULTS Only 1 well-designed randomized controlled trial was found. Most studies were retrospective or prospective. Initially, we found 1479 articles. Of those selected, 853 were from PubMed/MEDLINE, 32 were from Cochrane and 594 were from EMBASE. Our meta-analysis included a total of 3232 patients for all the included studies. Results found that 41 patients with HPCS experienced increased 1-year patient survival (OR 16.33; P=0.02) and increased 1-year graft survival (OR 17.67; P=0.01). The TPCS analysis with 1633 patients found patients had significantly shorter intensive care unit length of stay (days) (P=0.006) and hospital length of stay (P=0.02) and had decreased primary nonfunction (PNF) (OR 0.30, P=0.02) and mortality rates (OR 0.52, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative surgical portosystemic shunt in relation to liver transplantation with TPCS was able to prevent PNF, decrease hospital length of stay and unit care length of stay. Furthermore, in analyzing data for patients with HPCS, we observed increases in the 1-year graft and patient survival rates. More prospective randomized trials are needed to arrive at a more precise conclusion.
