Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 16(5): 857-863, 2022 05 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35656958

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Viruses are responsible for two-thirds of all acute respiratory tract infections. This study aims to retrospectively detect respiratory tract viruses in patients from all age groups who visited the hospital. METHODOLOGY: A total of 1592 samples from 1416 patients with respiratory tract symptoms were sent from several clinics to the Molecular Microbiology Laboratory at Gazi University Hospital from February 2016 to January 2019. Nucleic acid extraction from nasopharyngeal swabs, throat swabs or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples sent to our laboratory was done using a commercial automated system. Extracted nucleic acids were amplified by a commercial multiplex-real time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method, which can detect 18 viral respiratory pathogens. RESULTS: Among 1592 samples, 914 (57.4%) were positive for respiratory viruses. The most prevalent were rhinovirus (25.2%) and influenza A virus (12.1%), the least prevalent was the bocavirus (2.6%). Rhinovirus was the most detected as a single agent (21.2%, 194/914) among all positive cases, followed by coronavirus (9.3%, 85/914). The detection rates of coronavirus, human adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus A/B, human parainfluenza viruses, human metapneumovirus-A/B, human parechovirus, enterovirus and influenza B virus were 9.9%, 8%, 7.7%, 5%, 3.4%, 3.1%, 3%, and 2.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The most detected viral agents in our study were influenza A virus and rhinovirus. Laboratory diagnosis of respiratory viruses is helpful to prevent unnecessary antibiotic use and is essential in routine diagnostics for antiviral treatment. Multiplex Real-time PCR method is fast and useful for the diagnosis of viral respiratory infections.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Enterovirus Infections , Influenza, Human , Picornaviridae Infections , Respiratory Tract Infections , Coronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Enterovirus Infections/epidemiology , Hospitals, University , Humans , Influenza A virus , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Picornaviridae Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Retrospective Studies , Turkey/epidemiology
2.
Mikrobiyol Bul ; 55(3): 426-434, 2021 Jul.
Article in Turkish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416807

ABSTRACT

Human T-lymphotropic virus-I/II (HTLV-I/II) and human immun viruses (HIVs), that have similar genomic characteristics also share the same transmission routes and infect T lymphocytes. Regarding this epidemiological similarity, HIV and HTLV infections can be seen together. HIV and HTLV-I/II coinfection occurs with variable frequencies in different populations and geographic regions. There are not any population-based studies carried out defining the number of individuals coinfected with HIV and HTLV-I/II in Turkey. The aim of this study was to determine the seropositivity rates of HTLV-I/II in patients whose HIV viral load was monitored in Gazi University Faculty of Medicine Medical Virology Laboratory Forty-seven HIV positive cases followed-up in Medical Virology Laboratory for HIV viral load monitoring between May 2017-January 2019 were included in the study. HIV seropositivity of the samples was confirmed by the chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay method. HIV viral load values of the samples were evaluated by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. The samples were screened for antibodies against HTLV-I/II using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. The study population range was between 19 to 60 years of age. Among the study population, 39 (83%) patients were male and 8 (17%) patients were female. Of 47 samples, 18 samples (38.3%) had viral load of <1000 copies/ml, 10 samples (21.3%) had viral load of 1000-10000 copies/ml, 19 samples (40.4%) had viral load of ≥10000 copies/ml. HTLV serology was negative in all samples included in the study. CD4+ results were available for 42 patients and the CD4+ results of five patients could not be studied. Co-infection with different retroviruses is a well-known fact which should be thoroughly examined. HTLV-I co-infection leads to faster progression of the disease in HIV-1 positive patients. Although it is known that the co-infection has a significant effect on the progression of the disease, there are very few centers in the world and in our country that routinely perform HTLV testing in HIV-positive patients. We think that in order to evaluate the clinical and microbiological importance of the coinfection of retroviruses with each other and to determine the frequency of these infections together, there is a need for studies involving a larger number of patients, including detailed clinical backgrounds of individuals, and that the importance of this issue should be realized at the same time.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Human T-lymphotropic virus 1 , Female , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV-1/genetics , Human T-lymphotropic virus 1/genetics , Human T-lymphotropic virus 2/genetics , Humans , Male , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
3.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 21(5): e488-e492, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33642202

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with different types of human malignancies, including Burkitt lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and lymphomas. We retrospectively investigated the presence of EBV-DNA by real-time PCR in clinical samples of patients diagnosed as having hematologic malignancies while investigating the cause of lymphoproliferative disorders, and investigated its relationship to clinical manifestations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty clinical samples sent to Gazi University's hematology clinics between November 2013 and March 2018 were included. EBV-DNA was investigated by real-time PCR method, and EBV-IgM and EBV-IgG antibodies were investigated by ELISA. RESULTS: Fifty serum samples were investigated, and 10% (5/50) EBV-DNA positivity was determined in patients. Of the 5 patients with EBV-DNA positivity, 2 had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 1 lymphoma, 1 T-cell lymphoma, and 1 B-cell lymphoma. Concomitant EBV-DNA and viral capsid antigen (VCA)-IgM positivity was not detected. The VCA-lgM test results of the all EBV-DNA-positive patients were negative and VCA-IgG positive (except for 1 patient). Regarding virus load, of the 5 samples, 2, 1, 1, and 1 of the samples had a virus load of 102, 103, 104, and 105 copies/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION: EBV infection is threatening in patients with hematologic malignancies and are diagnosed by serologic and molecular methods. As a result of the study, we suggest that the detection of EBV-DNA by real-time PCR in patients being admitted with lymphoproliferative diseases and diagnosed as acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphomas may be useful in follow-up and treatment.


Subject(s)
Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/complications , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/complications , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...