Performance on advanced pharmacy practice experiences after implementation of mock acute care patient simulations.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to compare student performance on acute care advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) pre- and post-incorporation of mock acute care patient simulations into the curriculum. METHODS: A series of mock acute care APPE simulations (MACAS) were developed and incorporated into Touro University California College of Pharmacy curriculum for first- and second-year pharmacy students. Results for student performance on Acute Care I and Acute Care II APPEs were collected for students who received none, one year, or two years of the MACAS. Student admission characteristics and didactic academic performance (grade point average [GPA]) were also gathered. Student characteristics and APPE performance were compared across cohorts of students who received none, one year, and two years of MACAS. Multivariate models were created to measure the impact of the MACAS while controlling for student characteristics. RESULTS: The final cohort included 394 students. In unadjusted analyses, students with one or two years of MACAS received significantly higher preceptor acute care APPE evaluations for communication, professionalism, and patient scores vs. students who received no MACAS. In multivariate models controlling for age, gender, and undergraduate GPA, one year of MACAS increased student acute care APPE communication, professionalism, and patient care scores, relative to no MACAS. Similar increases in acute care APPE scores were seen for students who received two years of MACAS. CONCLUSIONS: MACAs significantly improved acute care APPE scores relative to students with no MACAS. This improvement in acute care APPEs occurred after students received a single year of MACAS.

Implementation of Mock Acute Care Advance Pharmacy Practice Experience Simulations and an Assessment Rubric.

Objective. To implement a mock acute care advanced pharmacy practice experience series into the didactic training of second-year pharmacy students and validate an accompanying assessment rubric. Methods. Three 90-minute acute care patient simulation laboratory sessions were developed with input from clinical specialists, preceptors, students, and faculty members. An accompanying student evaluation rubric was also developed. The assessment rubric was validated using pairs of preceptor raters to determine inter-rater reliability, along with predictive validity on advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) acute care scores. A student survey was also conducted. Results. The mock acute care APPEs were successfully implemented into the didactic curriculum. The assessment rubric had good inter-rater reliability and good predictive validity with acute care APPEs. Survey results indicated that students found the mock acute care APPE simulation laboratories useful. Conclusion. Other schools seeking to enhance their students' preparedness for and performance in acute care APPEs should consider implementing acute care APPE simulations in the didactic curriculum.