Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Med Econ ; 19(5): 526-36, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26735844

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Brain metastases among lung cancer patients can impair cognitive and functional ability, complicate care, and reduce survival. This study focuses on the economic burden of brain metastasis in lung cancer-direct healthcare costs to payers and indirect costs to patients, payers, and employers-in the US. METHODS: Retrospective study using claims data from over 60 self-insured Fortune 500 companies across all US census regions (January 1999-March 2013). Adult, non-elderly lung cancer patients with brain metastasis were evaluated over two study periods: (1) pre-diagnosis (≤30 days prior to first observed lung cancer diagnosis to ≤30 days prior to first-observed brain metastasis diagnosis) and (2) post-diagnosis (≤30 days prior to first observed brain metastasis diagnosis to end of continuous eligibility or observation). OUTCOME MEASURES: Healthcare costs to payers and resource utilization, salary loss to patients, disability payouts for payers, and productivity loss to employers. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were followed for a median of 8.4 and 6.6 months in the pre- and post-diagnosis periods, respectively. At diagnosis of brain metastasis, 21.2% of patients were on leave of absence and 6.1% on long-term disability leave. Substantial differences were observed in the pre- vs post-diagnosis periods. Specifically, patients incurred much greater healthcare utilization in the post-diagnosis period, resulting in $25,579 higher medical costs per-patient-per-6-months (PPP6M). During this period, patients missed significantly more work days, generating an incremental burden of $2853 PPP6M in salary loss for patients, $2557 PPP6M in disability payments for payers, and $4570 PPP6M in productivity loss for employers. LIMITATIONS: Type of primary lung cancer and extent of brain metastasis could not be assessed in the data. The analysis was also limited to patients with comprehensive disability coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Development of brain metastasis among lung cancer patients is associated with a substantial economic burden to payers, patients, and employers.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/economics , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Cost of Illness , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Financing, Personal , Health Services/economics , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance Claim Review/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Disability/economics , Lung Neoplasms/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
2.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 31(8): 1587-97, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26029864

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited post-crizotinib treatment options for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might lead to poor survival and high economic burden. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate real-world treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), and costs following crizotinib discontinuation. METHODS: This study used chart review and claims data. First, 27 participating US oncologists reviewed medical records of ALK-positive NSCLC patients who discontinued crizotinib monotherapy and reported patient demographic and clinical information, including post-crizotinib treatment and mortality. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Second, three large administrative US claims databases were pooled. NSCLC patients were selected if they discontinued crizotinib monotherapy. Post-crizotinib costs were analyzed separately for patients who did or did not discontinue antineoplastic treatment after crizotinib monotherapy. All data were collected prior to ceritinib approval for this patient population. RESULTS: A total of 119 ALK-positive NSCLC patients discontinued crizotinib monotherapy. Upon discontinuation, 42% had no additional antineoplastic treatment and 13% received radiation therapy only. The median OS post-crizotinib was 61 days; patients with brain metastases had shorter OS than those who did not (44 vs. 69 days, P = 0.018), and patients without further antineoplastic treatment had shorter OS than those who did (17 vs. 180 days, P < 0.001). From claims data, 305 ALK-positive NSCLC patients discontinued crizotinib monotherapy. After discontinuation, 72% had no additional antineoplastic treatment. Among patients who continued antineoplastic treatment, monthly healthcare costs averaged $22,160, driven by pharmacy ($9202), inpatient ($6419), and outpatient radiotherapy ($2888) and imaging ($1179) costs. Among patients who discontinued any antineoplastic treatment, monthly healthcare costs averaged $3423, mostly driven by inpatient costs ($2074). CONCLUSIONS: After crizotinib monotherapy, most patients either received radiotherapy only or discontinued antineoplastic treatment altogether. OS after discontinuing crizotinib was poor and shorter among those with brain metastases than without, and among those without subsequent antineoplastic treatment than with. Patients who continued antineoplastic treatment incurred substantial healthcare costs.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/analysis , Aged , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/enzymology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Crizotinib , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/enzymology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...