Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Optom Vis Sci ; 74(3): 160-3, 1997 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9159806

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Children often resist instillation of mydriatic drops for dilated fundus evaluation. As cycloplegic sprays have proven useful, this study's aim was to demonstrate efficacy of a mydriatic spray. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy subjects, ages 2 to 8 years, participated in the study. All but two had dark brown irides. Subjects were given either one drop each of 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine in each eye or one application of mydriatic spray (containing concentrations of 0.5% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine) to each closed eyelid. Pupils were measured with a pupil gauge before drug delivery and every 10 min thereafter, for 40 min. RESULTS: Repeated measures analysis of variance for the five time intervals demonstrated no significant difference between the two application methods nor in the method/time interaction, but a statistically significant increase in pupil size over time (p < 0.0005) for each method. A t-test revealed no statistically significant difference in pupil size (p > 0.05) between the two methods of drug administration at 40 min after application. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that use of mydriatic sprays on closed eyelids is as efficacious as use of mydriatic drops in open eyes for children.


Subject(s)
Mydriatics/administration & dosage , Phenylephrine/administration & dosage , Pupil/drug effects , Tropicamide/administration & dosage , Administration, Topical , Child , Child, Preschool , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Ophthalmic Solutions , Reference Values
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...