Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 18(6): 1728-1732, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36412436

ABSTRACT

Background and Objective: Radiation induced toxicities in heart and lungs are diminishes the survival rate of cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric parameters of hybrid plans for chest wall irradiation of left breast carcinoma patients using Monaco treatment planning system and compare with the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans. Materials and Methods: Fifteen carcinoma left breast patients were randomly selected to evaluate the advantage of hybrid plan over VMAT. Hybrid plans were generated with 70% and 30% dose contribution from forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy and VMAT, respectively, whereas VMAT had been done with full prescription. Conformity and homogeneity indices were evaluated for target coverage between hybrid and VMAT plans. Results: Hybrid plan has proved its superiority over VMAT in terms of better organ at risk sparing and lesser low dose spillage and at the same time providing comparable target coverage. In low-dose spectrum, VMAT showed higher dose-volume than the hybrid plan. The maximum variation was found to be 44.75% at 7 Gy and the minimum dose difference was observed at 1 Gy (6.02%). Conclusion: This study suggests that the hybrid plan could be a better option for left-sided chest wall irradiation in regular clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiometry , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Thoracic Wall
2.
J Med Phys ; 42(1): 42-47, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28405107

ABSTRACT

Response of Al2O3:C-based nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter was studied for the dosimetry of 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV therapeutic electron beams. With reference to ionization chamber, no change in the response was observed with the change in the energy of electron beams for the field size from 6 cm × 6 cm to 25 cm × 25 cm, dose rates from 100 MU/min to 600 MU/min, and the linearity in the response up to 300 cGy. The fading of the transient signal was higher for 20 MeV electron beam than that of 6 MeV electron beam by about 5% as compared to value at 20 min after irradiation. The depletion of OSL signal per readout in 200 successive readouts was also found to change with dose and energy of electron beam from 6 MeV (9% and 12% per readout at 2 and 10 Gy, respectively) to 20 MeV (9% and 16% at 2 and 10 Gy, respectively). The OSL sensitivity changed in the range from 2% to 6% with accumulated doses from 2 to 8 Gy and with electron energy from 6 to 20 MeV, but the sensitivity could be reset using an optical annealing treatment. Although negligible fading for postirradiation storage from 20 min to several months, acceptable precision and linearity in the desired range, and high reproducibility makes nanoDot dosimeters very attractive for the dosimetry of therapeutic electron beams, a note should be made for changes in sensitivity at doses beyond 2 Gy and electron beams energy dependence in reuse, short-term fading, and signal depletion on repeated readout.

3.
J Med Phys ; 41(1): 12-20, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27051165

ABSTRACT

The advent of modern technologies in radiotherapy poses an increased challenge in the determination of dosimetric parameters of small fields that exhibit a high degree of uncertainty. Percent depth dose and beam profiles were acquired using different detectors in two different orientations. The parameters such as relative surface dose (D S), depth of dose maximum (D max), percentage dose at 10 cm (D 10), penumbral width, flatness, and symmetry were evaluated with different detectors. The dosimetric data were acquired for fields defined by jaws alone, multileaf collimator (MLC) alone, and by MLC while the jaws were positioned at 0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 cm away from MLC leaf-end using a Varian linear accelerator with 6 MV photon beam. The accuracy in the measurement of dosimetric parameters with various detectors for three different field definitions was evaluated. The relative D S(38.1%) with photon field diode in parallel orientation was higher than electron field diode (EFD) (27.9%) values for 1 cm ×1 cm field. An overestimation of 5.7% and 8.6% in D 10 depth were observed for 1 cm ×1 cm field with RK ion chamber in parallel and perpendicular orientation, respectively, for the fields defined by MLC while jaw positioned at the edge of the field when compared to EFD values in parallel orientation. For this field definition, the in-plane penumbral widths obtained with ion chamber in parallel and perpendicular orientation were 3.9 mm, 5.6 mm for 1 cm ×1 cm field, respectively. Among all detectors used in the study, the unshielded diodes were found to be an appropriate choice of detector for the measurement of beam parameters in small fields.

4.
Appl Opt ; 55(5): 1001-5, 2016 Feb 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26906366

ABSTRACT

We demonstrate a Q-switched erbium-doped fiber laser using tungsten disulfide (WS2) as a saturable absorber. The WS2 is deposited onto fiber ferrules using a drop-casting method. Passive Q-switched pulses operating in the C-band region with a central wavelength of 1560.7 nm are successfully generated by a tunable pulse repetition rate ranging from 27.2 to 84.8 kHz when pump power is increased from 40 to 220 mW. At the same time, the pulse width decreases from a maximum value of 3.84 µs to a minimum value of 1.44 µs. The signal-to-noise ratio gives a stable value of 43.7 dB. The modulation depth and saturation intensity are measured to be 0.99% and 36.2 MW/cm², respectively.

5.
Technol Cancer Res Treat ; 11(2): 141-7, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22335408

ABSTRACT

Dosimetric changes caused by the positional uncertainty of centering a small electron cutout to the machine central axis (CAX) of the linear accelerator (linac) were investigated. Six circular cutouts with 4 cm diameter were made with their centres shifted off by 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 mm from the machine CAX. The 6 x 6 cm(2) electron applicator was used for the measurement. The percentage depth doses (PDDs) were measured at the Machine CAX and also with respect to cutout centre for 6, 9, 12, 16 and 20 MeV electron beams. The in-line and cross-line profiles were measured at the depth of maximum dose (R100). The relative output factor (ROF) was measured at the reference depth. All the measurements were made at nominal source to surface distance (100 cm SSD) as well as at extended SSDs (100, 102, 106 and 110 cm). When the cutout centre was shifted away from the machine CAX for low energy beams the depth of 100% dose (R(100)), the depth of 90% dose (R(90)) and the depth of 80% dose (R(80)) had no significant change. For higher energies (>9 MeV) there was a reduction in these dosimetric parameters. The isodose coverage of the in-line and cross-line profile was reduced when the cutout centre was shifted away from the machine CAX. At extended SSDs the dosimetric changes are only because of geometric divergence of the beam and not by the positional uncertainty of the cutout. It is important for the radiation oncologist, dosimetrist, therapist and physicist to note such dosimetric changes while using the electron beam to the patients.


Subject(s)
Electrons , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Radiotherapy Dosage
6.
J Med Phys ; 36(3): 133-7, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21897558

ABSTRACT

The use of megavoltage X-ray sources of radiation, with their skin-sparing qualities in radiation therapy, has been proved useful in relieving patient discomfort and allowing higher tumor doses to be given with fewer restrictions due to radiation effects in the skin. The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric characteristics of a physical and enhanced dynamic wedge from a dual-energy (6 and 18 MV) linear accelerator such as surfaces doses with different source to surface distances (SSD), half value layer (HVL) in water and peripheral doses for both available energies. At short SSD such as 85 cm, higher surface doses are produced by the lower wedges by the short wedge-to-skin distance. For physical wedged field, at heel edge side HVL value was high (17 cm) compared with the measured that of EDW (15.1 cm). It was noticed that, the HVL variation across the beam was significantly higher for 6 MV X-rays than for 18 MV X-rays. The lower wedge has the maximum variation of peripheral dose compared to other wedges. The three wedge systems discussed in this work possess vastly different dosimetric characteristics. These differences will have a direct impact on the choice of the wedge system to be used for a particular treatment. Complete knowledge of the dosimetric characterisitics, including the surface and peripheral doses, is crucial in proper choice of particular wedge systems in clinical use.

7.
Gulf J Oncolog ; (10): 11-7, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21724524

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to examine the plan quality and monitor unit with sliding window IMRT and RapidArc (RA) treatment plans using American Association Physicists in Medicine TG119 test suite DICOM-RT images and structure sets. The structure set includes multi-target (superior, central, inferior), prostate, head and neck and C-shape. Plans were performed with Eclipse planning system using AAA algorithm with the plan goals specified in TG119. The plan results for multitarget shows that the D99 is greater than the plan goal for all the targets. The D10 is less than the plan goal for superior and inferior targets in both IMRT and RA plans. The D10 is 5% more with IMRT plan and 7% more with RA plan for central target in comparison with plan goal. The plan results for prostate shows that D95 is greater than the plan goal for both IMRT and RA plans. The D5 is less than the plan goal for IMRT plan and almost equal to plan goal for RA plan. The D30 is less than the plan goal for bladder and rectum in both the plans. The D10 is higher than the plan goal by 1.9% and 2.5% in IMRT and RA plan for rectum. The plan results for head and neck shows that the D99 and D90 were greater than the plan goal for PTV. The spinal cord and parotid doses were less than the plan goal in both the plans. The plan results for C-shape shows that the D95 was greater than the plan goal and D10 was less than the plan goal for PTV. The dose to central core was less than the plan goal in both IMRT and RA plans. Both the IMRT and RapidArc plans have met the plan goal for all the target and normal structures. RapidArc optimization and treatment planning requires more time than the IMRT plan. The monitor unit calculated by the RapidArc plan is less compared to IMRT plan, which reduces the treatment error caused by patient motion during treatment and integral dose.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans
8.
J Med Phys ; 36(2): 111-6, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21731228

ABSTRACT

Intracavitary brachytherapy is an integral part of radiotherapy for locally advanced gynecologic malignancies. A dosimetric intercomparison of high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR_BT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in cervical carcinoma has been made in the present study. CT scan images of 10 patients treated with HDR_BT were used for this study. A sliding-window IMRT (IMRT_SW) and step-and-shoot IMRT plans were generated using 6-MV X-rays. The cumulative dose volume histograms of target, bladder, rectum and normal tissue were analyzed for both techniques and dose distributions were compared. It was seen that the pear-shaped dose distribution characteristic of intracavitary brachytherapy with sharp dose fall-off outside the target could be achieved with IMRT. The integral dose to planning target volume was significantly higher with HDR_BT in comparison with IMRT. Significant differences between the two techniques were seen for doses to 1 cc and 2 cc of rectum, while the differences in 1 cc and 2 cc doses to bladder were not significant. The integral doses to the nontarget critical and normal structures were smaller with HDR_BT and with IMRT. It is concluded that IMRT can be the choice of treatment in case of non-availability of HDR brachytherapy facilities or when noninvasive treatments are preferred.

9.
Gulf J Oncolog ; (9): 27-35, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21177206

ABSTRACT

Peripheral dose (PD) or the dose outside the geometrical boundaries of the radiation field is of clinical importance when anatomical structures with low dose tolerances might be involved(1). It is the aim of this study is to estimate the PD on linear accelerators on different wedge systems without multileaf collimator (MLC). Measurements were performed on a dual energy linear accelerator equipped with tertiary MLC and enhanced dynamic wedge (EDW). Measurements were made using an ionization chamber embedded in a Radiation Field Analyser (RFA-300) with the secondary collimator and MLC setting of 5x5, 10x10, 15x15, and 20x20 cm2, and with the MLC fully retracted. The effects of SSD on PD were measured at three SSDs of 90, 100, and 110 cm for the irradiation fields of 5x5, 10x10, 15x15, and 20x20 cm2 and the effects of the three different wedges (Upper wedge, Lower Wedge and Enhanced Dynamic Wedge) on PD were measured for 45° wedges with field size of 15x15 cm2. Data were taken from 3 cm to 24 cm away from the field edge. Results show that due to tertiary MLC, PD can be reduced by means of a factor of two to three at certain distance from the edge of the field compared with TG-36 data. In between the wedges, the PD was less for the EDW when compared with the upper and lower physical wedges. We conclude that the reduction in PD is significant in reducing or eliminating the need for external peripheral shielding to reduce the dose on affected critical organs.


Subject(s)
Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Humans , Radiotherapy Dosage
10.
J Med Phys ; 35(4): 207-14, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21170185

ABSTRACT

Electron beam therapy is widely used in the management of cancers. The rapid dose fall-off and the short range of an electron beam enable the treatment of lesions close to the surface, while sparing the underlying tissues. In an extended source-to-surface (SSD) treatment with irregular field sizes defined by cerrobend cutouts, underdosage of the lateral tissue may occur due to reduced beam flatness and uniformity. To study the changes in the beam characteristics, the depth dose, beam profile, and isodose distributions were measured at different SSDs for regular 10 × 10 cm(2) and 15 × 15 cm(2) cone, and for irregular cutouts of field size 6.5 × 9 cm(2) and 11.5 × 15 cm(2) for beam energies ranging from 6 to 20 MeV. The PDD, beam flatness, symmetry and uniformity index were compared. For lower energy (6 MeV), there was no change in the depth of maximum dose (R100) as SSD increased, but for higher energy (20 MeV), the R(100) depth increased from 2 cm to 3 cm as SSD increased. This shows that as SSD increases there is an increase in the depth of the maximum dose for higher energy beams. There is a +7 mm shift in the R(100) depth when compared with regular and irregular field sizes. The symmetry was found to be within limits for all the field sizes as the treatment distance extended as per International Electro technical Commision (IEC) protocol. There was a loss of beam flatness for irregular fields and it was more pronounced for lower energies as compared with higher energies, so that the clinically useful isodose level (80% and 90%) width decreases with increase in SSD. This suggests that target coverage at extended SSD with irregular cut-outs may be inadequate unless relatively large fields are used.

11.
Gulf J Oncolog ; (8): 20-7, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20601335

ABSTRACT

Implementation of Intensity Modulation Radiotherapy (IMRT) and patient dose verification was carried out with film and I'mariXX using linear accelerator with 120-leaf Millennium dynamic multileaf collimator (dMLC). The basic mechanical and electrical commissioning and quality assurance tests of linear accelerator were carried out. The leaf position accuracy and leaf position repeatability checks were performed for static MLC positions. Picket fence test and garden fence test were performed to check the stability of the dMLC and the reproducibility of the gap between leaves. The radiation checks were performed to verify the position accuracy of MLCs in the collimator system. The dMLC dosimetric checks like output stability, average leaf transmission and dosimetric leaf separation were also investigated. The variation of output with gravitation at different gantry angles was found to be within 0.9 %. The measured average leaf transmission for 6 MV was 1.6 % and 1.8% for 18 MV beam. The dosimetric leaf separation was found to be 2.2 mm and 2.3 mm for 6 MV and 18 MV beams. In order to check the consistency of the stability and the precision of the dMLC, it is necessary to carryout regular weekly and monthly checks. The dynalog files analysis for Garden fence, leaf gap width and step wedge test patterns carried out weekly were in good agreement. Pretreatment verification was performed for 50 patients with ion chamber and I'mariXX device. The variations of calculated absolute dose for all treatment fields with the ion chamber measurement were within the acceptable criterion. Treatment Planning System (TPS) calculated dose distribution pattern was comparable with the I'mariXX measured dose distribution pattern. Out of 50 patients for which the comparison was made, 36 patients were agreed with the gamma pixel match of >95% and 14 patients were with the gamma pixel match of 90-95% with the criteria of 3% delta dose (DD) and 3 mm distance-to-agreement (DTA). Commissioning and quality assurance of dMLC for IMRT application requires considerable time and effort. Many dosimetric characteristics need to be assessed carefully failing which the delivered dose will be significantly different from the planned dose. In addition to the issues discussed above we feel that individual MU check is necessary before the treatment is delivered.


Subject(s)
Film Dosimetry/instrumentation , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/instrumentation , Humans , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation
12.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 6(2): 179-84, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20622365

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the agreement between measured and calculated dose plays an essential role in the quality assurance (QA) procedures of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). AIM: The purpose of this study is to compare performances of the two dosimetric systems (EDR2 and I'matriXX) in the verification of the dose distributions calculated by the TPS for brain and head and neck dynamic IMRT cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The comparison of cumulative fluence by using Kodak extended dose rate (EDR2) and I'matriXX detectors has been done for the evaluation of 10 brain, 10 head and neck IMRT cases treated with 6 MV beams. The parameter used to assess the quality of dose calculation is the gamma-index (g -index) method. The acceptance limits for g calculation we have used are 3% and 3 mm respectively for dose agreement and distance to agreement parameters. Statistical analyses were performed by using the paired, two-tailed Student t-test, and P< 0.01 is kept as a threshold for the significance level. RESULTS: The qualitative dose distribution comparison was performed using composite dose distribution in the measurement plane and profiles along various axes for TPS vs. EDR2 film and TPS Vs I'matriXX. The quantitative analysis between the calculated and measured dose distribution was evaluated using DTA and g-index. The percentage of pixels matching with the set DTA and g values are comparable for both with EDR2 film and I'matriXX array detectors. Statistically there was no significant variation observed between EDR2 film and I'matriXX in terms of the mean percentage of pixel passing g for brain cases (98.77 +/- 1.03 vs 97.62 +/- 1.66, P = 0.0218) and for head and neck cases (97.39 +/- 2.13 vs 97.17 +/- 1.52%, P = 0.7404). CONCLUSION: Due to simplicity and fast evaluation process of array detectors, it can be routinely used in busy departments without compromising the measurement accuracy.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Film Dosimetry/methods , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/standards , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/standards , Humans , Ions , Particle Accelerators , Photons , Radiotherapy Dosage
13.
Med Dosim ; 34(1): 20-5, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19181251

ABSTRACT

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common malignancy arising in the female genital tract. Intracavitary vaginal cuff irradiation may be given alone or with external beam irradiation in patients determined to be at risk for locoregional recurrence. Vaginal cylinders are often used to deliver a brachytherapy dose to the vaginal apex and upper vagina or the entire vaginal surface in the management of postoperative endometrial cancer or cervical cancer. The dose distributions of HDR vaginal cylinders must be evaluated carefully, so that clinical experiences with LDR techniques can be used in guiding optimal use of HDR techniques. The aim of this study was to optimize dose distribution for Gammamed plus vaginal cylinders. Placement of dose optimization points was evaluated for its effect on optimized dose distributions. Two different dose optimization point models were used in this study, namely non-apex (dose optimization points only on periphery of cylinder) and apex (dose optimization points on periphery and along the curvature including the apex points). Thirteen dwell positions were used for the HDR dosimetry to obtain a 6-cm active length. Thus 13 optimization points were available at the periphery of the cylinder. The coordinates of the points along the curvature depended on the cylinder diameters and were chosen for each cylinder so that four points were distributed evenly in the curvature portion of the cylinder. Diameter of vaginal cylinders varied from 2.0 to 4.0 cm. Iterative optimization routine was utilized for all optimizations. The effects of various optimization routines (iterative, geometric, equal times) was studied for the 3.0-cm diameter vaginal cylinder. The effect of source travel step size on the optimized dose distributions for vaginal cylinders was also evaluated. All optimizations in this study were carried for dose of 6 Gy at dose optimization points. For both non-apex and apex models of vaginal cylinders, doses for apex point and three dome points were higher for the apex model compared with the non-apex model. Mean doses to the optimization points for both the cylinder models and all the cylinder diameters were 6 Gy, matching with the prescription dose of 6 Gy. Iterative optimization routine resulted in the highest dose to apex point and dome points. The mean dose for optimization point was 6.01 Gy for iterative optimization and was much higher than 5.74 Gy for geometric and equal times routines. Step size of 1 cm gave the highest dose to the apex point. This step size was superior in terms of mean dose to optimization points. Selection of dose optimization points for the derivation of optimized dose distributions for vaginal cylinders affects the dose distributions.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/methods , Endometrial Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Equipment and Supplies , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brachytherapy/instrumentation , Clinical Protocols , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Radiotherapy Dosage , Technology, Radiologic/instrumentation
14.
J Med Phys ; 33(3): 108-13, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19893700

ABSTRACT

In this study, absorbed doses were measured and compared for high-energy electrons (6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV) using International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Technical Reports Series No. 277 (TRS), TRS 381, and TRS 398 dosimetry protocols. Absolute dose measurements were carried out using FC65-G Farmer chamber and Nordic Association of Clinical Physicists (NACP) parallel plate chamber with DOSE1 electrometer in WP1-D water phantom for reference field size of 15 x 15 cm(2) at 100 cm source-to-surface distance. The results show that the difference between TRS 398 and TRS 381 was about 0.24% to 1.3% depending upon the energy, and the maximum difference between TRS 398 and TRS 277 was 1.5%. The use of cylindrical chamber in electron beam gives the maximum dose difference between the TRS 398 and TRS 277 in the order of 1.4% for energies above 10 MeV (R(50) > 4 g/cm(2)). It was observed that the accuracy of dose estimation was better with the protocols based on the water calibration procedures, as no conversion quantities are involved for conversion of dose from air to water. The cross-calibration procedure of parallel plate chamber with high-energy electron beams is recommended as it avoids p(wall) correction factor entering into the determination of k(Q,Qo).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...