Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
J Vasc Access ; : 11297298231187168, 2023 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37464777

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) published a guideline regarding continuous ultrasound guidance for central venous catheters in 2020. YouTube has been a popular educational platform since its inception. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the adequacy of videos on ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization posted on YouTube based on this guideline. METHOD: YouTube was scanned using the keywords associated with ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization and 46 of the 106 most-watched videos were included in the study. The videos were divided into three groups, as individual, manufacturer, and academic according to their sources, and were evaluated as poor, satisfactory, and good in terms of the overall content. The videos were then evaluated based on ESA's six-title guide for more specific informational content. RESULTS: A total of 46 videos were reviewed and 52.2% (n = 24) were found to be prepared by individuals. Among the videos, the rate of videos describing only venipuncture (poor) was 23.9% (n = 11), 73.9% (n = 34) of videos described the verification of the guidewire location with venipuncture, and 2.2% of videos described all the recommendations suggested by the guide (n = 1). At the end of the catheterization procedure, 4.3% (n = 2) stated that the catheter location should be confirmed by using ultrasound, 15.2% (n = 7) recommended chest-X-ray, and 80.4% (n = 37) did not suggest any. CONCLUSION: Manufacturer and academic videos can be watched due to their high-quality scores, but it may be practical to prepare training videos with guidelines both for educators and students to have global access to the renewed guideline information.

2.
Head Face Med ; 11: 35, 2015 Oct 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26467984

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of submucosal application of tramadol, for acute postoperative facial pain, following the extraction of impacted third molar teeth. This prospective, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled study included 60 ASA I-II patients undergoing impacted third molar surgery under local anaesthesia. Following the surgical procedure, patients were randomly divided into two groups; group T (1 mg/kg tramadol) and group S (2-mL saline). Treatments were applied submucosally after surgery. Pain after extraction was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. The time at which the first analgesic drug was taken, the total analgesic dose used, and adverse tissue reactions were also evaluated. In group T, postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower compared to that in group S (p < 0.05). This study demonstrated that post-operative submucosal application of tramadol is an effective method for reducing acute post-operative facial pain after impacted third molar surgery.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Tramadol/administration & dosage , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Tramadol/adverse effects , Tramadol/therapeutic use , Young Adult
3.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 73(11): 2103-7, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26044602

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study compared the analgesic efficacy of postoperative tramadol versus ketamine for preventing pain after mandibular molar extraction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety patients who had undergone molar extraction were randomly divided into 3 groups: group T (tramadol 1 mg/kg), group K (ketamine 0.5 mg/kg), and group P (saline 2 mL). The treatment was applied to the extraction sockets using resorbable gelatin sponges. Pain after extraction was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: The VAS scores after extraction were statistically higher in group P than in either treatment group. Group K had the lowest pain intensity. CONCLUSION: This study shows that topical tramadol and ketamine are effective alternatives for decreasing pain after molar extractions.


Subject(s)
Ketamine/therapeutic use , Mandible/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Tramadol/therapeutic use , Administration, Topical , Adult , Female , Humans , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Male , Tramadol/administration & dosage , Young Adult
4.
Angle Orthod ; 85(1): 48-57, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24913740

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the treatment effects of corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics in patients with Class III malocclusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 19 patients with a mean age of 13.12 ± 1.28 years. Initially, patients were monitored for 5 months before treatment to evaluate growth changes. Changes during control, protraction and fixed orthodontic treatment periods were compared with the cephalometric radiographs taken initially, before protraction, after protraction, and after fixed orthodontic treatment. Treatment outcomes also were compared with the growth effects. RESULTS: Sagittal measurements of maxilla showed significant improvements (3.59 ± 1.32 mm) during the protraction period (3.85 ± 1.12 months) whereas no significant changes were seen during the control period. Upper and lower incisor inclinations were increased, and the upper occlusal plane angle showed significant counterclockwise rotation during protraction. Significant soft-tissue changes also reflected the underlying skeletal changes. Maxillary advancement was stable during fixed orthodontic treatment. CONCLUSION: Compared with control period of the patients, this protocol produced significant improvements in skeletal and soft-tissue structures.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/instrumentation , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Osteotomy, Le Fort/methods , Palatal Expansion Technique , Adolescent , Cephalometry/methods , Child , Face/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incisor/pathology , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/therapy , Maxilla/growth & development , Maxilla/pathology , Maxilla/surgery , Nasal Bone/pathology , Palatal Expansion Technique/instrumentation , Retrognathia/surgery , Retrognathia/therapy , Rotation , Sella Turcica/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Vertical Dimension
5.
Saudi Med J ; 32(6): 593-7, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21666941

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of sedation and general anesthesia for surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE). METHODS: This randomized prospective study included 30 patients who were scheduled for SARPE, and was performed between January 2008 to February 2010 in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. Patients were allocated into Group S - midazolam + fentanyl sedation (n=15), and Group G - general anesthesia (n=15). Hemodynamic parameters, duration of anesthesia, surgery, recovery time, time to discharge, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at 30 minutes (min), one hour (hr), 4 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours, first consumption of analgesic time, total amount of consumption of analgesics, patient and surgeon satisfaction, nausea, and vomiting were recorded. RESULTS: Analgesic time was significantly longer in Group S (p=0.008), and total analgesic consumption was significantly lower in Group S than in Group G (p=0.031). Patient satisfaction was statistically higher in Group S (p=0.035). At 30 min, one hr, and 12 hrs, VAS satisfaction scores in Group S were statistically lower than those in Group G, and at 4 hrs and 24 hrs there was no statistical difference in VAS scores for both groups. CONCLUSION: The use of sedation for outpatient SARPE resulted in lower pain scores at discharge, lower analgesic consumption, and greater patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Palatal Expansion Technique , Palate/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Male
6.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 69(6): 1594-9, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21277062

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effects of fentanyl and tramadol, used in combination, as sedation for third molar surgical extraction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 60 patients undergoing extraction of a horizontal third molar with an Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale score above 10 points. All of the patients were first given a 0.03-mg/kg bolus of midazolam, and then they were randomized into 3 groups: group A, midazolam only; group B, midazolam and 1-µg/kg fentanyl; and group C, midazolam and 1-mg/kg tramadol. The vital signs were recorded. Patients were assessed for postoperative pain and adverse effects, and patient and surgeon satisfaction was assessed. RESULTS: No differences were found in the heart rate among groups (P > .05). The mean blood pressure was also similar until the 40th minute, after which the mean blood pressure in the patients in group A was lower than that in the other 2 groups (P < .01). In the postoperative pain assessment, the visual analog scale scores of the patients in group C were lower than those in the other 2 groups in the first postoperative hour (P < .05). The time at which the first rescue analgesic was taken in groups A, B, and C was 3, 3.5, and 5 hours postoperatively, respectively, and was significantly later in group C (P < .01). No difference was found in patient/surgeon satisfaction among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tramadol has a better analgesic effect in third molar surgery than fentanyl and placebo.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Dental , Conscious Sedation , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Molar, Third/surgery , Tooth Extraction , Tramadol/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Combined , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative , Patient Satisfaction , Tooth, Impacted/surgery
7.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 69(4): 1023-30, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21216077

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical efficacy of midazolam plus low-dose ketamine conscious intravenous sedation on relief from or prevention of postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus after the surgical extraction of third molars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars (n = 50) were included. All patients received an initial dose of 0.03 mg/kg intravenous midazolam; then patients in the midazolam-placebo (MP) group received 2 mL of a placebo IV, while patients in the midazolam-ketamine (MK) group received 2 mL of a ketamine + saline combination (0.3 mg/kg ketamine + saline) IV. RESULTS: Facial swelling on postoperative days was significantly lower in the MK group than in the MP group (P = .001). Mouth opening on postoperative days was significantly greater in the MK group than in the MP group (P = .001). Pain scores measured on a visual analog scale at 4, 12, and 24 hours after surgery were significantly higher in the MP group than in the MK group (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Conscious intravenous sedation with midazolam/low-dose ketamine during surgical extraction of third molars can provide the patient with a comfortable procedure and good postoperative analgesia, with less swelling and significantly less trismus. Intravenous low-dose ketamine may be safe and effective in reducing postoperative pain.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Dissociative/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Conscious Sedation , Edema/prevention & control , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Tooth Extraction , Trismus/prevention & control , Adult , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Carticaine/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mandible/surgery , Mouth/drug effects , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Placebos , Safety , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
8.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 67(6): 1206-10, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19446205

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy of combined treatment with local anesthetic and subanesthetic ketamine for the relief or prevention of postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus after the surgical extraction of third molars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: local anesthetic alone (LAA) and local anesthetic plus ketamine (LAK). The patients in the LAA group received 5 mL of a local anesthetic and saline combination comprising 2 mL of local anesthetic and 3 mL of saline. The patients in the LAK group received 5 mL of a local anesthetic, ketamine, and saline combination comprising 2 mL of local anesthetic and 0.3 mg/kg ketamine and saline. RESULTS: Facial swelling on postoperative days was significantly lower in the LAK group than in the LAA group (P = .0001). The mouth opening on the postoperative days was significantly greater in the LAK group than in the LAA group (P = .0001). The pain scores on the VAS at 30 minutes and 1, 4, 12, and 24 hours after surgery were significantly higher in the LAA group than in the LAK group (P = .0001, P = .005). CONCLUSION: The combination of a local anesthetic and subanesthetic doses of ketamine during surgical extraction of third molars can produce good local anesthesia while affording a comfortable procedure for the surgeon and patient and providing good postoperative analgesia with less swelling and significantly less trismus.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Combined/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Dissociative/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Edema/prevention & control , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Tooth Extraction , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Trismus/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Face , Female , Humans , Male , Mandible/surgery , Pain Measurement , Time Factors , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Young Adult
9.
Neurosciences (Riyadh) ; 11(3): 175-9, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22266616

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of single injection femoral nerve block (FNB) on the independence level in functional activities in the early postoperative period in patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We conducted this prospective, randomized, blinded trial in the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hacettepe University Hospital Ankara, Turkey, between June 2003 and April 2004. Twenty-three patients scheduled for elective TKA were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group I received preemptive single injection FNB, group II received postoperative single injection FNB, and group III served as a control group. Intravenous morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA) was used following surgery in all groups. Morphine dose and pain score defined by the visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded postoperatively at the 15th minute, 30th minute, 1st, 4th, 6th, 12th, 24th, and 48th hours. A standard rehabilitation protocol was applied for all patients. The independence level in functional activities was assessed during the first 2 postoperative days and at discharge with the Iowa Level of Assistance Scale (ILAS) and the Iowa Ambulation Speed Scale (IASS). Physical therapists that enrolled in the study were blinded to the groups. RESULTS: Pain scores were significantly different between the groups (p<0.05). The preemptive and postoperative FNB group`s VAS scores were both significantly lower than the control group (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between preemptive and postoperative FNB groups (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in any of the functional scores in the first 2 postoperative days, and at discharge (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Single injection FNB provided effective analgesia in patients undergoing TKA. However, the independence level in functional activities in the early postoperative period was not influenced by the analgesia method.

10.
Anesth Analg ; 101(3): 705-709, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16115978

ABSTRACT

Myoclonic movements and pain on injection are common problems during induction of anesthesia with etomidate. We investigated the influence of pretreatment with magnesium and two doses of ketamine on the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus and pain. A prospective double-blind study was performed on 100 ASA physical status I-III patients who were randomized into 4 groups according to the pretreatment drug: ketamine 0.2 mg/kg, ketamine 0.5 mg/kg, magnesium sulfate (Mg) 2.48 mmol, or normal saline. Ninety seconds after the pretreatment, anesthesia was induced with etomidate 0.2 mg/kg. Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg was used as the muscle relaxant. An anesthesiologist, blinded to group allocation, recorded the myoclonic movements, pain, and sedation on a scale between 0-3. Nineteen of the 25 patients receiving Mg (76%) did not have myoclonic movements after the administration of etomidate, whereas 18 patients (72%) in the ketamine 0.5 mg/kg, 16 patients (64%) in the ketamine 0.2 mg/kg, and 18 patients (72%) in the control group experienced myoclonic movements (P < 0.05). We conclude that Mg 2.48 mmol administered 90 s before the induction of anesthesia with etomidate is effective in reducing the severity of etomidate-induced myoclonic muscle movements and that ketamine does not reduce the incidence of myoclonic movements.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Intravenous/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Etomidate/adverse effects , Magnesium Sulfate/therapeutic use , Myoclonus/chemically induced , Myoclonus/prevention & control , Adult , Depression, Chemical , Double-Blind Method , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology , Respiratory Mechanics/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...