Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 49(9): 951-9, 2007 Mar 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17336718

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of coronary binary in-stent restenosis (ISR) with angiography using 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) compared with invasive coronary angiography (ICA). BACKGROUND: A noninvasive detection of ISR would result in an easier and safer way to conduct patient follow-up. METHODS: We performed CTCA in 81 patients after stent implantation, and 125 stented lesions were scanned. Two sets of images were reconstructed with different types of convolution kernels. On CTCA, neointimal proliferation was visually evaluated according to luminal contrast attenuation inside the stent. Lesions were graded as follows: grade 1, none or slight neointimal proliferation; grade 2, neointimal proliferation with no significant stenosis (<50%); grade 3, neointimal proliferation with moderate stenosis (> or =50%); and grade 4, neointimal proliferation with severe stenosis (> or =75%). Grades 3 and 4 were considered binary ISR. The diagnostic accuracy of CTCA compared with ICA was evaluated. RESULTS: By ICA, 24 ISRs were diagnosed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 92%, 81%, 54%, and 98% for the overall population, whereas values were 91%, 93%, 77%, and 98% when excluding unassessable segments (15 segments, 12%). For assessable segments, CTCA correctly diagnosed 20 of the 22 ISRs detected by ICA. Six lesions without ISR were overestimated as ISR by CTCA. As the grade of neointimal proliferation by CTCA increases, the median value of percent diameter stenosis increased linearly. CONCLUSIONS: Binary ISR can be excluded with high probability by CTCA, with a moderate rate of false-positive results.


Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography , Coronary Restenosis/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Coronary Restenosis/classification , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stents
2.
Circ J ; 70(5): 564-71, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16636491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is a promising noninvasive method of detecting coronary artery disease (CAD). However, most data have been obtained in selected series of patients. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of 64-slice MSCT (64 MSCT) in daily practice, without any patient selection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using 64-slice MSCT coronary angiography (CTA), 69 consecutive patients, 39 (57%) of whom had previously undergone stent implantation, were evaluated. The mean heart rate during scan was 72 beats/min, scan time 13.6 s and the amount of contrast media 72 mL. The mean time span between invasive coronary angiography (ICAG) and CTA was 6 days. Significant stenosis was defined as a diameter reduction of > 50%. Of 966 segments, 884 (92%) were assessable. Compared with ICAG, the sensitivity of CTA to diagnose significant stenosis was 90%, specificity 94%, positive predictive value (PPV) 89% and negative predictive value (NPV) 95%. With regard to 58 stented lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 93%, 96%, 87% and 98%, respectively. On the patient-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CTA to detect CAD were 98%, 86%, 98% and 86%, respectively. Eighty-two (8%) segments were not assessable because of irregular rhythm, calcification or tachycardia. CONCLUSION: Sixty-four-MSCT has a high accuracy for the detection of significant CAD in an unselected patient population and therefore can be considered as a valuable noninvasive technique.


Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography/standards , Coronary Stenosis/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Aged , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stents
3.
Circ J ; 68(11): 1088-92, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15502394

ABSTRACT

The experience of using a novel application of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusions is reported in 2 cases. In the first case, an IVUS catheter was advanced into a side branch to identify the entry point of the major branch. In the second case, IVUS-guided penetration of the guidewire from the false lumen to the true lumen after causing a dissection was successful.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Disease/therapy , Ultrasonography, Interventional/instrumentation , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Dissection/etiology , Aortic Dissection/therapy , Chronic Disease , Coronary Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Aneurysm/etiology , Coronary Aneurysm/therapy , Coronary Angiography , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ultrasonography, Interventional/adverse effects
4.
Jpn Heart J ; 45(4): 573-80, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15353868

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the influence of diabetes on plaque volume and vessel size at a reference segment in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using both angiograms and quantitative intravascular ultrasound. A total of 344 patients with 449 de novo coronary lesions including 97 diabetics (133 lesions) who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention under intravascular ultrasound guidance were included in this study. Eleven diabetic patients (19 lesions) received insulin and 52 patients (77 lesions) oral hypoglycemic drugs. The other 34 patients (37 lesions) received diet/exercise therapy alone. We measured vessel area (VA) and lumen area (LA) at proximal and distal reference segments by intravascular ultrasound, which were averaged. Plaque area (VA-LA) and % plaque area (100 x plaque area/VA) were subsequently calculated. Although VA was similar between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (13.46 +/- 4.49 mm2 in diabetics versus 14.11 +/- 5.24 mm2 in non-diabetics, P = 0.214), LA was smaller (6.51 +/- 2.63 mm2 versus 7.38 +/- 3.08 mm2, P = 0.004) and % PA was larger (50.4 +/- 11.7 versus 46.5 +/- 11.3, P < 0.001) in diabetic patients, especially the group receiving a hypoglycemic drug or insulin. VA, LA, and % PA were similar between patients with and without insulin treatment. These results potentially might cause undersized device selection without intravascular ultrasound guidance.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Diabetes Complications , Diabetic Angiopathies/diagnostic imaging , Diabetic Angiopathies/therapy , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Body Weights and Measures/methods , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Stents
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...