ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare newly-modified and aged chemoPET tubes, which contain no problematic surfactants, with commercially available serum blood collection tubes (BCTs) for use in analysis of cortisol, total triiodothyronine (TT3), total thyroxine (TT4), and routine clinical chemistry analytes in serum from apparently healthy volunteers and pooled quality control (QC) specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood specimens collected from 60 apparently healthy volunteers (18 males, 42 females) and pooled QC specimens poured into seven different BCTs were analyzed by a trained phlebotomist. Cortisol, TT3, and TT4 levels were measured on an Immulite 1000 instrument and routine chemistry tests were analyzed on a Siemens RxL instrument. The significance of differences between chemoPET and other BCT types compared to glass tubes were assessed by Student's paired t-test or repeated measures ANOVA or their non-parametric equivalents. The BCT-related biases (deviation from glass tubes) in analyte concentrations were compared with the current desirable allowable bias, derived from biological variation. Serum analyte concentrations in the different BCTs that exceeded their respective significant change limits were considered clinically significant. RESULTS: No statistically and/or clinically significant differences were noted in the analyte concentrations from serum specimens and pooled QC material when our newly modified and aged chemoPET tubes were compared to glass and other BCTs. CONCLUSIONS: The chemoPET tubes described here may be a suitable alternative to serum BCTs that contain problematic surfactants known to interfere with some clinical assays on the Immulite 1000 and RxL instruments.
Subject(s)
Phlebotomy/instrumentation , Humans , Quality ControlABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Several previous studies have described the effects of interfering substances on clinical assay results; however, the effects of exogenous substances, particularly additives from blood collection tubes on quality control (QC) specimens and serum specimens have not been well examined. This study examines the effects of blood-collection tube additives on total triiodothyronine (TT3), and thyroxine (TT4), cortisol, and routine clinical chemistry tests in QC and serum specimens from apparently healthy volunteers. METHODS: QC and serum specimens were poured or collected into different blood collection tubes. TT3 and TT4, cortisol, and routine chemistry tests were analyzed from the different blood-collection tube types. RESULTS: The findings of this study demonstrate statistically and/or clinically significant blood collection tube-related alterations in the TT3, TT4, and cortisol concentrations of QC specimens and TT4 concentrations from serum specimens. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have important implications for clinical laboratories, demonstrating that QC specimens should ideally, like patients' specimens, be poured into blood collection tubes. This strategy would reveal any adverse effects caused by blood collection tubes, which otherwise would not likely be detected by most routine QC practices. The results of this study also show the importance of producing blood collection tubes that contain additives that are truly inert and do not adversely affect clinical laboratory testing.
