Adverse drug reactions as a reason for admission to an internal medicine ward in Argentina.

BACKGROUND: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In spite of this, ADR are largely underreported and unrecognized. PURPOSE: Identify and characterize ADR related admissions to our internal medicine ward using a proactive multidisciplinary pharmacovigilance approach. METHODS: Within 24 hrs of admission 1045 patients admitted to the Internal Medicine Ward between August 2010 and February 2012 were screened for possible or probable ADR related admissions. RESULTS: Probable ADR accounted for 112 of 1045 admissions (10.7%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 8.8-12.6%), of which only 16 (14.3%) were classified as unavoidable. NSAIDs were the drug group more commonly implicated in probable ADR-related admissions (17.0%), followed by antiplatelets (16.1%). In-hospital mortality of patients admitted due to probable ADR was 8.0% (95% CI: 2.9-13.1%). During this study period, 6% of internal medicine ward and 4% of critical care unit beds were occupied by patients with probable ADR. The estimated cost of care of these patients was 641,000 US dollars (USD). CONCLUSION: ADR are a frequent reason for admission to an Internal Medicine Ward in Argentina. The culprit drugs and interactions are similar to those reported in the literature. The cost is substantial and most of the ADR are potentially avoidable.

Venous thromboprophylaxis in general surgery ward admissions: strategies for improvement.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the adherence to institutional venous thromboprophylaxis clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in general surgery patients and to assess the effectiveness of a multi-strategy improvement intervention. DESIGN: A prospective before-after study. SETTING: Two teaching hospitals located in the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. PARTICIPANTS: Prescriptions belonging to patients admitted to the general surgery wards were evaluated. INTERVENTION: A multi-strategy intervention that included (i) simplification of institutional CPGs for venous thromboprophylaxis using a single drug at a single dose, based on the American College of Chest Physicians recommendations, (ii) distribution of pocket cards with an algorithm for the implementation of new recommendations to both, physicians and nurses, working in the general surgery units, (iii) educational talks, (iv) paper-based reminders and (v) audit and feedback. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The adherence of the venous thromboprophylaxis prescription to the institutional recommendations. RESULTS: The prescriptions of 100 admitted patients before and 90 after the intervention were included in the analysis. The initial rate of adherence was 31%. After the intervention this rate rose to 71.1% (P< 0.001). The major improvement observed was the reduction in omitted prophylaxis in patients at risk of venous thromboembolism from 45 to 13.3% (P< 0.001). In the adjusted model, prescribing compliance with CPGs was five times more likely during the second stage than during the first stage (OR = 5.60, 95% CI = 2.92-10.74). CONCLUSIONS: Simple and economical interventions such as those described in this study can improve general surgeons compliance with the institutional and international guidelines, thus assuring patient safety and quality of health care.

Brugada electrocardiographic pattern induced by fever.

Brugada syndrome is a major cause of sudden death in young adults. Fever has been described to induce a Brugada-type electrocardiogram in asymptomatic patients with a negative family history, to disclose Brugada syndrome and to increase the risk of death and induce T wave alternans in patients with diagnosed Brugada syndrome. Risk stratification is challenging and demands a careful evaluation. Here we present 2 case reports and review the literature.

[Quality of care in diabetic patients receiving pharmacologic treatment]. / Calidad de atención en pacientes diabéticos bajo tratamiento farmacológico.

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease with an increasing prevalence. Appropriate treatment of the disease and prevention of chronic complications reduce morbidity and mortality in a cost-effective manner. These actions should be measured through the use of validated indicators for quality of care. The goal of this study was to assess the quality of care in diabetic patients under pharmacologic treatment in a private university hospital. A retrospective study was conducted in adult patients who bought insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents during a 3 month period; demographic and clinical data were obtained for 12 consecutive months following the buying period. The study included 305 adult patients; most were males (60%), with type 2 diabetes (95%), and using oral hipoglycemic agents (86%). Control of blood pressure was registered in 80%, foot exam in 5%, eye exam in 27%, HbA1C blood level in 85%, complete lipid profile in 82%, microalbuminuria in 27% and creatinine clearance in 22% of patients, respectively. Mean values were HbA1C 7.1(+/- 1.6)%, and < or = 7% in 66%, LDL 113 (+/- 33.6) mg/dl and <100 mg/dl in 30%, BP 136-79 mm Hg and < 130-80 mm Hg in 46% of patients, respectively. This study emphasizes the need for quality of care assessment through validated indicators and points out the aspects that should be improved within a health care system.