HIPAA update: changes to notice of privacy practices and new requirements for analyzing breaches.

Timely compliance with the 2013 Omnibus Rule requires health care providers to review their NPPs and use the new breach risk assessment standard beginning on or after September 23, 2013.

Anxiety and panic fear in adults with asthma: prevalence in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Patients may find it difficult to distinguish between the symptoms of anxiety and those of asthma. Findings are equivocal on whether there is a specific link between anxiety and asthma. The aims of this study were to i) to identify the prevalence of anxiety, depression and panic fear in adults with asthma compared with that of the general population ii) to investigate whether there is a specific relationship between asthma and anxiety. METHODS: An epidemiological survey of 872 adults with a diagnosis of asthma identified from six General Practices in Sheffield, England. Community postal survey using self-completion questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 59%. People with asthma had higher mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety scores than UK norms with a higher proportion above the clinical cut-off. Mean HADS depression scores were significantly higher than UK norms and norms for a general population sample of people registered with the same practice. These effects were age-related with the relationship between asthma and psychological distress most marked over the age of 45. The prevalence of asthma-specific panic fear was 15.7%. CONCLUSION: A significant minority of people have high levels of panic fear (as measured by the Asthma Symptom Checklist) associated with asthma. However, in adults with asthma there is also high prevalence of both generalised anxiety and depression (as measured by the HADS), suggesting that the link of anxiety to asthma may be part of a broader relationship between psychological distress and chronic disease rather than a specific one.

Bronchial auscultation: an effective adjunct to speech and language therapy bedside assessment when detecting dysphagia and aspiration?

Detection of aspiration by bedside examination has frequently been found to be clinically inadequate when compared with videofluoroscopy (VF) as the gold standard. In Doncaster, UK, a new multidisciplinary approach to bedside assessment was devised using physiotherapists (PT) performing bronchial auscultation (BA) in combination with the speech and language therapists' (SLT) clinical examination of dysphagia. In this study 105 patients referred for VF examination of dysphagia were first tested by the BA team. Comparison was made between the results of the VF team and the results of the BA team in classifying the patients as "aspirating" or at "risk of aspirating." A high degree of agreement was found for risk of aspiration (sensitivity 87%), although specificity was low (37%). BA was highly specific (88%) when confirming the absence of aspiration, but sensitivity to the presence of aspiration was 45%. From the 105 patients tested, the BA team would have failed to modify the diet in only one subject who was aspirating and would have unnecessarily modified the diet of 17 subjects. In conclusion, in the sample population of individuals with complex dysphagia, the BA team approach reliably detected patients identified by VF as at risk of aspiration. In the group of patients identified by VF as aspirating, the BA team proved unreliable in detecting the presence of aspiration, although it did reliably identify patients who were not aspirating. BA is a potentially useful clinical tool which requires further research.

Is training in psychosocial interventions worthwhile? Report of a psychosocial intervention trainee follow-up study.

A follow-up study of psychosocial intervention (PSI) trainees from the Sheffield and Maudsley training centres was undertaken in three stages. In Stage 1, 141 students, at two PSI training centres, were sent a simple postal questionnaire to elicit career trajectory following PSI training. A response rate of 82% was achieved. The sub-group, who had been trained and who still engaged in clinical practice were identified and followed-up in more detail (n=96). The effect of PSI training in a range of domains was investigated. The impact of training may not be to equip students with formal technical skills in CBT and family work. What is more likely is that trainees acquired proficiency in: working effectively using a case management model; conveying 'therapeutic optimism'; enabling users to meet their own goals and helping them to develop better coping strategies; using 'stress vulnerability' and formal outcome measures as means of structuring this approach. The secondary aim of the study was to identify and prioritise the barriers that impede the effective implementation of PSI skills in routine service settings. For the second phase of the survey the response rate was again 82%. This group's service managers were identified and surveyed for the same information and 59% responded. The aim was to gather information about implementation issues from both the clinical and service perspectives. The results of the survey indicate that PSI training has a positive impact on the development of services for people with serious mental health problems although there are serious organisational hurdles for managers, trainees and organisations to overcome if PSI skills are to be properly implemented. Key factors that impact upon faithful implementation are related to resource issues (caseload size), organisational factors (the existence of an implementation plan and training strategy), and the extent to which the trainee's team is supportive.