ABSTRACT
Although iron overload is clinically significant, only limited data have been published on iron overload in haematological diseases. We investigated cardiac and liver iron accumulation by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a cohort of 87 subjects who did not receive chelation, including 59 haematological patients. M-HIC (MRI-based hepatic iron concentration, normal values <36 µmol/g) is a non-invasive, liver biopsy-calibrated method to analyse iron concentration. This method, calibrated to R2 (transverse relaxation rate), was used as a reference standard (M-HIC(R2)). Transfusions and ferritin were evaluated. Mean M-HIC(R2) and cardiac R(*) of all patients were 142 µmol/g (95% CI, 114-170) and 36.4 1/s (95% CI, 34.2-38.5), respectively. M-HIC(R2) was higher in haematological patients than in patients with chronic liver disease or normal controls (P<0.001). Clearly elevated cardiac R2(*) was found in two myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients with severe liver iron overload. A poor correlation was found between liver and cardiac iron (n=82, r=0.322, P=0.003), in contrast to a stronger correlation in MDS (n=7, r=0.905, P=0.005). In addition to transfusions, MDS seemed to be an independent factor in iron accumulation. In conclusion, the risk for cardiac iron overload in haematological diseases other than MDS is very low, despite the frequently found liver iron overload.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of in-phase and out-of-phase imaging to assess hepatic iron concentration in patients with haematological malignancies and chronic liver disease. METHODS: MRI-based hepatic iron concentration (M-HIC, µmol g(-1)) was used as a reference standard. 42 patients suspected of having iron overload and 12 control subjects underwent 1.5 T in- and out-of-phase and M-HIC liver imaging. Two methods, semi-quantitative visual grading made by two independent readers and quantitative relative signal intensity (rSI) grading from the signal intensity differences of in-phase and out-of-phase images, were used. Statistical analyses were performed using the Spearman and Kruskal-Wallis tests, receiver operator curves and κ coefficients. RESULTS: The correlations between M-HIC and visual gradings of Reader 1 (r = 0.9534, p < 0.0001) and Reader 2 (r = 0.9456, p < 0.0001) were higher than the correlations of the rSI method (r = 0.7719, p < 0.0001). There was excellent agreement between the readers (weighted κ = 0.9619). Both visual grading and rSI were similar in detecting liver iron overload: rSI had 84.85% sensitivity and 100% specificity; visual grading had 85% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The differences between the grades of visual grading were significant (p < 0.0001) and the method was able to distinguish different degrees of iron overload at the threshold of 151 µmol g(-1) with 100% positive predictive value and negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: Detection and grading of liver iron can be performed reliably with in-phase and out-of-phase imaging. Liver fat is a potential pitfall, which limits the use of rSI.
