Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 50(12): 2565-2574, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30048410

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare training loads between men and women during 14 wk of British Army standard entry basic training. METHODS: Thirty-one male (mean ± SD: age, 21 ± 4 yr; height, 1.78 ± 0.08 m; mass, 77.1 ± 10.5 kg) and 28 female (age, 22 ± 4 yr; height, 1.65 ± 0.05 m; mass, 63.9 ± 8.9 kg) British Army recruits had external (distance) and internal (HR, training impulse [TRIMP], RPE) training loads measured during weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, and 13 of basic training. Total energy expenditure was measured during weeks 1 to 2 and weeks 12 to 13. RESULTS: Daily distance was higher for men than women (13,508 ± 666 vs 11,866 ± 491 m, respectively, P < 0.001). Average daily HR (29% ± 3% vs 30% ± 3% HR reserve) and RPE (4 ± 1 vs 4 ± 1) were not different between men and women, respectively (P ≥ 0.495). Daily TRIMP was higher for women than men (492 ± 130 vs 261 ± 145 au, respectively, P < 0.001). Total energy expenditure was higher for men than women during weeks 1 to 2 (4020 ± 620 vs 2847 ± 323 kcal·d, respectively) and weeks 12 to 13 (4253 ± 556 kcal·d vs 3390 ± 344 kcal·d, respectively) (P < 0.001). Daily RPE, HR, and TRIMP were related to daily distance (R = 0.18-0.57, P ≤ 0.037), and daily RPE was related to daily TRIMP and HR (R = 0.37-0.77, P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences in training loads could contribute to the greater injury risk for women during basic training. Daily RPE appears a practical option for measuring internal training load during military training.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Physical Conditioning, Human , Sex Factors , Workload , Adolescent , Adult , Energy Metabolism , Fatigue , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Male , Myalgia , Young Adult
2.
Mil Med ; 183(9-10): e392-e398, 2018 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29590455

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Foot drill is a key component of military training and is characterized by frequent heel stamping, likely resulting in high tibial shock magnitudes. Higher tibial shock during running has previously been associated with risk of lower limb stress fractures, which are prevalent among military populations. Quantification of tibial shock during drill training is, therefore, warranted. This study aimed to provide estimates of tibial shock during military drill in British Army Basic training. The study also aimed to compare values between men and women, and to identify any differences between the first and final sessions of training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tibial accelerometers were secured on the right medial, distal shank of 10 British Army recruits (n = 5 men; n = 5 women) throughout a scheduled drill training session in week 1 and week 12 of basic military training. Peak positive accelerations, the average magnitude above given thresholds, and the rate at which each threshold was exceeded were quantified. RESULTS: Mean (SD) peak positive acceleration was 20.8 (2.2) g across all sessions, which is considerably higher than values typically observed during high impact physical activity. Magnitudes of tibial shock were higher in men than women, and higher in week 12 compared with week 1 of training. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first estimates of tibial shock magnitude during military drill training in the field. The high values suggest that military drill is a demanding activity and this should be considered when developing and evaluating military training programs. Further exploration is required to understand the response of the lower limb to military drill training and the etiology of these responses in the development of lower limb stress fractures.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Stress/classification , Tibia/pathology , Accelerometry/instrumentation , Accelerometry/methods , Adult , Female , Fractures, Stress/etiology , Humans , Male , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Running/injuries , Running/physiology , Teaching/standards , Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Tibia/physiopathology , United Kingdom
3.
J Sci Med Sport ; 21(6): 591-595, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29100827

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Women are resistant to neuromuscular fatigue compared to men in response to a range of exercise tasks. The sex differences in the neuromuscular responses to load carriage have yet to be investigated. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Twenty-three male and 19 female British Army recruits completed a 9.7km loaded march within 90min, with the weight carried dependent on military trade (16±2kg for men and 15±1kg for women). Isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force of the knee extensors and vertical jump (VJ) height were examined pre- and post-loaded march to examine neuromuscular fatigue. Heart rate (HR) was recorded throughout and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded following the march. RESULTS: HR was higher for women (173±9bmin-1, 83±6% heart rate reserve) than men (158±8bmin-1, 72±6% heart rate reserve) (p≤0.001). RPE following the march was also higher for women than men (6±2 vs 4±2, respectively, p<0.001). The loss in MVC force was greater for men than women (-12±9% vs -9±13%, respectively, p=0.031), however VJ height was impaired to a similar extent (-5±11% vs -5±6%, respectively, p=0.582). CONCLUSIONS: The greater physiological stress during load carriage for women compared to men did not translate to a greater severity of knee extensor muscle fatigue, with women demonstrating fatigue resistance.


Subject(s)
Muscle Fatigue , Sex Factors , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Heart Rate , Humans , Isometric Contraction , Knee/physiology , Male , Military Personnel , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Physical Exertion , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL