Nonsurgical management of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Aggressively applied radiotherapy can cure approximately 15% to 20% of medically inoperable patients. It is hoped that with more sophisticated treatment planning and more dose-intensive radiation, the results in these tumors can be improved. No good clinical evidence to date suggests that including areas of subclinical involvement will result in higher cure rates. In patients who have regionally advanced disease, combination therapy consisting of concurrent chemotherapy and irradiation seems to have yielded an improvement in short-term and median survival. Patients selected for this type of aggressive treatment must have a good performance status and should be less than 70 years of age. Refinements in chemotherapeutic agents, in the delivery of radiotherapy, and in the interdigitation of these modalities are areas of intense clinical research.

The initial results in muscle-invading bladder cancer of RTOG 95-06: phase I/II trial of transurethral surgery plus radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by selective bladder preservation or cystectomy depending on the initial response.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety, tolerance, and efficacy of transurethral surgery plus concomitant cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and radiation therapy in conjunction with selective bladder preservation in patients with muscle-invading bladder cancer. Patients and Methods. Thirty-four eligible patients with clinical stage T2-T4a, Nx M0 bladder cancer without hydronephrosis were entered into a protocol aimed at selective bladder preservation. Treatment began with as complete a transurethral resection as possible followed by induction chemoradiation. This consisted of cisplatin 15 mg/m(2) i.v. and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m(2) i.v. in the mornings on d 1, 2, 3, 15, 16, and 17. On d 1, 3, 15, and 17, radiation was given immediately following the chemotherapy using twice-a-day 3 Gy per fraction cores to the pelvis for a total radiation dose of 24 Gy. Response was evaluated by cystoscopy, cytology, and rebiopsy four weeks later. Patients with a complete response received consolidation therapy with the same drugs and doses on d 1, 2, 3, 15, 16, and 17 combined with twice-daily radiation therapy to the bladder and bladder tumor volume of 2.5 Gy per fraction for a total consolidation dose of 20 Gy and a total induction plus consolidation dose to the bladder and bladder tumor of 44 Gy. Patients who did not achieve a complete response were advised to undergo prompt cystectomy, as were those with a subsequent invasive recurrence. The median follow up is 29 months. RESULTS: Of the 34 eligible patients, 26 had a visibly complete transurethral resection. One patient did not complete induction treatment due to acute hematologic toxicity. After induction treatment, 22 (67%) of the 33 patients had no tumor detectable on urine cytology or rebiopsy. Of the 11 patients who still had detectable tumor, six underwent radical cystectomy and five underwent consolidation chemoradiation (one because of refusal to have the recommended cystectomy and four because the treating institutions erroneously assigned them to receive consolidation chemoradiation rather than cystectomy). No patient has required a cystectomy for radiation toxicity. Six patients have died of bladder cancer. The actuarial overall survival at three years is 83%. The probability of surviving with an intact bladder is 66% at three years. A total of seven patients (21%) developed grade 3 or grade 4 hematologic toxicity in conjunction with this treatment. CONCLUSION: This aggressive protocol comprising local surgery plus concurrent 5-FU, cisplatin, and high-dose hypofractionated radiation has been associated with moderately severe hematologic toxicity. Longer follow-up will be necessary to assess efficacy. Both the 67% complete response rate to induction therapy and the 66% three-year survival with an intact bladder are encouraging.

Recursive partitioning analysis of 1999 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) patients with locally-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC): identification of five groups with different survival.

PURPOSE: Survival of patients with locally-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is predicted by the stage of the disease and other characteristics. This analysis was undertaken to identify these characteristics in a large cooperative group patient population, as well as to define subgroups of the population with differing outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analysis included 1,999 patients treated in 9 RTOG trials between 1983 and 1994 with thoracic irradiation (RT) with (n = 355) or without chemotherapy (CT). RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the following characteristics were significantly associated with an improved survival: use of CT, CT delivered without major deviation, abnormal pulmonary function tests, normal hemoglobin, protein, LDH and BUN, presence of dyspnea, hemoptysis, cough or hoarseness, uninvolved lymph nodes, T1 or T2 stage, no malignant pleural effusion (PE), weight loss of < 8%, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of at least 90, adenocarcinoma histology, female gender, and age less than 70 years. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was subsequently applied to identify 5 patient subgroups with significantly different median survival times (MST): Group I, KPS of > or = 90, who received chemotherapy (MST 16.2 months); Group II, KPS of > or = 90, who received no CT, but had no PE (MST 11.9 months); Group III, KPS < 90, younger than 70 years, with non-large cell histology (MST 9.6 months); Group IV, KPS > or = 90, but with PE, or KPS < 90, younger than 70 years, and with large cell histology, or older than 70 years, but without PE (MST 5.6-6.4 months); Group V, older than 70, with PE (MST 2.9 months). CONCLUSION: Cisplatinum-based CT improves survival, for excellent prognosis of LA-NSCLC patients, over RT alone. The presence of a malignant pleural effusion is a major negative prognostic factor for survival. The identification of RPA prognostic groups among patients with LA-NSCLC provides prognostic information and may serve as a basis of stratification in future trials.

Anal sphincter conservation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum: long-term results of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 89-02.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of a multi-institutional, national cooperative group study attempting functional preservation of the anorectum for patients with limited, distal rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 21, 1989 and November 1, 1992, a Phase II trial of sphincter-sparing therapy was conducted for patients with clinically mobile rectal cancers located below the pelvic peritoneal reflection. Protocol treatment was designed for patients who were, in the judgement of their attending surgeon, unsuitable for anal sphincter conservation in the context of anterior resection, and would have required abdominoperineal resection (APR) as conventional surgical therapy. Primary cancers were estimated to be 4 cm or less in largest clinical diameter, and occupied 40% or less of the rectal circumference. Chest radiography and computerized axial tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis excluded patients with overt lymphatic or hematogenous metastases. Protocol surgery was intended to remove the primary cancer by en-bloc, transmural excision of an ellipse of rectal wall by transanal, transcoccygeal, or trans-sacral technique, while conserving the anal sphincter. Based on tumor size, T classification, grade, and adequacy of surgical margins, patients were allocated to one of three treatment assignments: observation, or adjuvant treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and one of two different dose levels of local-regional radiation. After completion of protocol therapy, patients were observed with follow-up that included periodic general physical and rectal examination, determinations of CEA, abdominopelvic CT, chest radiography, and surveillance endoscopy. Sixty-five eligible and analyzable patients were registered. RESULTS: With minimum follow-up of 5 years and median follow-up of 6.1 years, 11 patients have failed: 3 patients recurred local-regionally only, 3 patients had distant failure alone, and 5 patients manifested local-regional and distant failure. Eight patients died of intercurrent illness. Local-regional failure correlated with T-category revealed: T1 1/27 (4%), T2 4/25 (16%), and T3 3/13 (23%). Local-regional failure escalated with percentage involvement of the rectal circumference: 2/31 (6%) among patients with cancers involving 20% or less of the rectal circumference, and 6/34 (18%) among patients with cancers involving 21-40% of the circumference. Distant dissemination rose with T-category with 1/27 (4%) T1, 3/25 (12%) T2, and 4/13 (31%) T3 patients manifesting hematogenous spread. Eight patients (12%) required temporary or permanent colostomy. Five of 8 patients with local-regional recurrence achieved local-regional control with management including surgery, although 4 of these patients subsequently developed distant dissemination. Three patients (5%) had persistent, uncontrolled, local disease. Actuarial freedom from pelvic relapse at 5 years is 88% based on the entire study population, and 86% for the less favorable patients treated with adjuvant radiation and 5-FU. CONCLUSION: Conservative, sphincter-sparing therapy is a feasible alternative treatment for selected patients with limited cancer involving the middle and lower rectum. Risk of both local and distant failure appears to escalate with increasing T-category (depth of invasion). Results achieved in the multi-institutional, cooperative group setting approximate results reported from single institutions.

Is prolonged survival possible for patients with supraclavicular node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy?: Analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group experience.

PURPOSE: To determine if patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and positive supraclavicular nodes (SN+) have a similar outcome to other patients with Stage IIIB NSCLC (SN-) when treated with modern chemoradiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) database, data were retrospectively analyzed from five RTOG trials studying chemoradiotherapy for NSCLC: 88-04, 88-08 (chemo-RT arm), 90-15, 91-06, 92-04. Comparisons were made between the SN+ and SN- subgroups with respect to overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and metastases-free survival (MFS) using the log rank test. Cox multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine the effect of several potential confounding variables, including histology (squamous vs. nonsquamous), age (>60 vs. < or = 60), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (<90 vs. > or = 90), weight loss (> or = 5% vs. <5%), and gender. RESULTS: A total of 256 Stage IIIB patients were identified, of whom 47 had supraclavicular nodes (SN+) and 209 did not (SN-). Statistically significantly more SN+ patients had nonsquamous histology (p = 0.05); otherwise, known prognostic factors were well balanced. The median survival for SN+ patients was 16.2 months, vs. 15.6 months for SN- patients. The 4-year actuarial survival rates were 21% and 16% for SN+ and SN- patients respectively (p = 0.44). There was no statistically significant difference in the 4-year PFS rates (19% vs. 14%, p = 0.48). The Cox analysis did not show the presence or absence of supraclavicular nodal disease to be a prognostic factor for survival, MFS, or PFS. The only statistically significant factor on multivariate analysis was gender, with males having a 40% greater risk of mortality than females (p = 0.03). There were no clinically significant differences in toxicity when comparing SN+ vs. SN- patients. Among the 47 SN+ patients, there were no reported cases of brachial plexopathy or other > or = Grade 2 late neurologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: When treated with modern chemoradiotherapy, the outcome for patients with supraclavicular metastases appears to be similar to that of other Stage IIIB patients. SN+ patients should continue to be enrolled in trials studying aggressive chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced NSCLC.

Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide.

BACKGROUND: For small-cell lung cancer confined to one hemithorax (limited small-cell lung cancer), thoracic radiotherapy improves survival, but the best ways of integrating chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy remain unsettled. Twice-daily accelerated thoracic radiotherapy has potential advantages over once-daily radiotherapy. METHODS: We studied 417 patients with limited small-cell lung cancer. All the patients received four 21-day cycles of cisplatin plus etoposide. We randomly assigned these patients to receive a total of 45 Gy of concurrent thoracic radiotherapy, given either twice daily over a three-week period or once daily over a period of five weeks. RESULTS: Twice-daily treatment beginning with the first cycle of chemotherapy significantly improved survival as compared with concurrent once-daily radiotherapy (P=0.04 by the log-rank test). After a median follow-up of almost 8 years, the median survival was 19 months for the once-daily group and 23 months for the twice-daily group. The survival rates for patients receiving once-daily radiotherapy were 41 percent at two years and 16 percent at five years. For patients receiving twice-daily radiotherapy, the survival rates were 47 percent at two years and 26 percent at five years. Grade 3 esophagitis was significantly more frequent with twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy, occurring in 27 percent of patients, as compared with 11 percent in the once-daily group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Four cycles of cisplatin plus etoposide and a course of radiotherapy (45 Gy, given either once or twice daily) beginning with cycle 1 of the chemotherapy resulted in overall two- and five-year survival rates of 44 percent and 23 percent, a considerable improvement in survival rates over previous results in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer.

The role of radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Most patients who receive a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have advanced disease and are not curable with surgery. Developments in the technology of radiation therapy (RT) have contributed to the broad utility of this treatment modality in both a curative and palliative capacity. Many patients at all stages, including those who are medically inoperable, may benefit from RT. Locally advanced NSCLC is treated commonly with combined modality therapy. Novel RT administration schedules and chemotherapy regimens for combined modality therapy are essential for improving the management of NSCLC. Additional benefits can be foreseen as new strategies for patient selection emerge.

Response, toxicity, failure patterns, and survival in five Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials of sequential and/or concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess response, toxicity, failure patterns, and survival differences in three chemotherapy (ChT)/radiation therapy (RT) sequencing strategies for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five completed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials for Stage II-IIIA/B inoperable NSCLC patients employed one of the three following strategy groupings: 1) sequential ChT followed by standard RT (60 Gy in 6 weeks); 2) combined sequential and concurrent ChT and standard RT (60 Gy in 6 weeks); or 3) concurrent ChT and hyperfractionated RT (69.6 Gy in 6 weeks). All five trials required KPS > or = 70; two trials (314 patients) required <5% weight loss and three trials (147 patients) had no minimum weight loss requirement. In all five trials the ChT used cisplatin with either vinblastine or oral etoposide. Combining data for the five trials yielded an evaluable group of 461 patients. The three methods of sequencing ChT and RT were evaluated for differences in response, acute and late toxicity, patterns of failure, and survival. Acute toxicity was defined as that occurring within 90 days from the start of RT. Late toxicity was defined as that occurring after 90 days from the start of RT. Acute or late toxicity > or = grade 3 was defined as severe. Site of first failure was recorded by date. In-field failure excluded distant metastasis as a failure and included only tissue in the RT treatment field. Overall progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as survival without evidence of intra- or extrathoracic tumor or death from any cause. RESULTS: Group 1 had a lower overall response rate (63%) compared to either Group 2 (77%) or Group 3 (79%), p = 0.03 and 0.003, respectively. Overall grade 4/5 acute toxicities were nearly equal between groups. The severe nonhematologic acute toxicities were significantly different by strategy group (p < 0.0001). Group 1 and 2 were not statistically different. Group 3 had significantly more patients with severe acute nonhematologic toxicity (55%) than either Group 1 (27%) or 2 (34%) with p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0005, respectively. This was due to a severe acute esophagitis rate of 34% for Group 3 versus 1.3% for Group 1 and 6% for Group 2 (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Overall grade 4/5 late toxicities did not differ by group. Severe late nonhematologic toxicities were different by group (p = 0.0098). Group 1 patients had significantly fewer severe late nonhematologic toxicities (14%) compared to patients in Groups 2 (26%) or 3 (28%) (p = 0.046 and 0.038, respectively). Severe late lung toxicity was 10% for Group 1 compared to 21% and 20% for Groups 2 and 3, respectively. Severe late lung toxicities differed by group (p = 0.033), but not severe late esophagitis (p = 0.077). There were no differences between the three strategy groups for patterns of first failure. The in-field failures were higher in Group 2 (71%) compared to Groups 1 (56%) and 3 (55%), p = 0.0478. Pairwise comparisons yielded p-values of 0.068 and 0.015 for Group 2 versus 1 and Group 2 versus 3, respectively. Three-year PFS was better in Group 2 (15%) and 3 (15%) compared to Group 1 (7%), but not statistically significant (p = 0.454). Similarly, in-field PFS was better in Group 2 (17%) and 3 (20%) than Group 1 (9%), but not significant (p = 0.167). There were improvements in 3-year survival for Group 2 (17%) and Group 3 (25%) compared to Group 1 (15%), but the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.47). The same results were present for patients with less than 5% weight loss and patients with stage IIIA tumors. CONCLUSION: Thus, concurrent ChT and hyperfractionated RT had a higher incidence of severe acute esophageal toxicity. Severe late lung toxicity with concurrent ChT/hyperfractionated RT, as well as with induction ChT followed by concurrent ChT/standard RT, may be greater compared to sequential ChT/RT. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Study of lung density corrections in a clinical trial (RTOG 88-08). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of lung density corrections on the dose delivered to lung cancer radiotherapy patients in a multi-institutional clinical trial, and to determine whether commonly available density-correction algorithms are sufficient to improve the accuracy and precision of dose calculation in the clinical trials setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A benchmark problem was designed (and a corresponding phantom fabricated) to test density-correction algorithms under standard conditions for photon beams ranging from 60Co to 24 MV. Point doses and isodose distributions submitted for a Phase III trial in regionally advanced, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 88-08) were calculated with and without density correction. Tumor doses were analyzed for 322 patients and 1236 separate fields. RESULTS: For the benchmark problem studied here, the overall correction factor for a four-field treatment varied significantly with energy, ranging from 1.14 (60Co) to 1.05 (24 MV) for measured doses, or 1.17 (60Co) to 1.05 (24 MV) for doses calculated by conventional density-correction algorithms. For the patient data, overall correction factors (calculated) ranged from 0.95 to 1.28, with a mean of 1.05 and distributional standard deviation of 0.05. The largest corrections were for lateral fields, with a mean correction factor of 1.11 and standard deviation of 0.08. CONCLUSIONS: Lung inhomogeneities can lead to significant variations in delivered dose between patients treated in a clinical trial. Existing density-correction algorithms are accurate enough to significantly reduce these variations.

Ten-year outcomes for pathologic node-positive patients treated in RTOG 75-06.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to see what fraction of prostate cancer patients with biopsy-proven nodes are free of cancer 10 years after radiation treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: RTOG protocol #75-06 included 90 patients with biopsy-proven pelvic nodal involvement treated with radiation. They have been continuously follow-up since treatment. When feasible, current prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels have been solicited from patients clinically cancer-free (no evidence of disease, NED) at 10 years, to confirm cure. RESULTS: The 10-year survival was 29%, the 10-year clinical NED survival 7%. PSA levels were obtained in 2 of 5 10-year clinical NED patients, they were both less than 0.8 ng/ml. The 2 proven cures were both clinical stage T-3, Gleason Score 6 and 8, and had 2 and 1 positive nodes, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed Gleason sum was significantly associated with clinical survival without disease. CONCLUSION: A small fraction of node-positive patients are cured at 10-year follow-up by radiation therapy (2 of 90 with PSA +3 of 90 by clinical endpoints). Innovative treatment programs should be directed at node-positive patients in an effort to improve the fraction cured.

Impact of surgical staging in evaluating the radiotherapeutic outcome in RTOG #77-06, a phase III study for T1BN0M0 (A2) and T2N0M0 (B) prostate carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate survival and time to metastatic disease in patients treated for localized prostatic carcinoma in a Phase III radiotherapy (RT) protocol, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 77-06. Patients with T18N0M0 (A2) or T2N0M0 (B) disease after lymphangiogram (LAG) or staging laparotomy (SL) were randomized between prophylactic radiation to the pelvic lymph nodes and prostatic bed vs. prostatic bed alone. The outcome of both treatment arms, as well as a comparison of the LAG group, to that of the SL group, are updated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 449 eligible males were entered into RTOG protocol 7706 between 1978 and 1983. Lymph node staging was mandatory but at the physician's discretion; 117 (26%) patients had SL, while 332 (74%) had LAG. Follow-up was a median of 12 years and a maximum of 16 years. For those randomized to receive prophylactic pelvic lymph nodal irradiation, 45 Gy of megavoltage RT was delivered via multiple portals in 4.5-5 weeks, while all patients received 65 Gy in 6.5-8 weeks to the prostatic bed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in survival whether treatment was administered to the prostate or prostate and pelvic lymph nodes. The SL group had greater 12-year survival than the LAG group (48% vs. 38%, p = 0.02). Disease-free survival was statistically significant, with 38% for the SL group vs. 26% for the LAG group (p = 0.003). Bone metastasis was less common in the SL group (14%) than the LAG group (27%) (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: At 12-year median follow-up, there still was no survival difference in those patients treated prophylactically to the pelvic nodes and prostatic bed vs. the prostatic bed alone. Those patients not surgically staged with only LAG for lymph node evaluation were less accurately staged, as reflected by a statistically significant reduced survival and earlier metastases.

Induction cisplatin/vinblastine and irradiation vs. irradiation in unresectable squamous cell lung cancer: failure patterns by cell type in RTOG 88-08/ECOG 4588. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To analyze disease failure patterns by pretreatment characteristics and treatment groups in a prospective randomized trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with medically inoperable Stage II, unresectable IIIA and IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancer with KPS > or =70 and weight loss < or =5% were randomized to one of three treatment groups: standard radiation therapy with 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (STD RT), induction chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 days 1 and 29 with vinblastine 5 mg/m2 weekly for 5 weeks followed by 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (CT + RT), or hyperfractionated radiation therapy with 69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy b.i.d. (HFX RT). Of 490 patients enrolled, 458 were evaluable. Minimum and median periods of observation for this analysis were 4 years and 6 years, respectively. RESULTS: Pretreatment characteristics were equally distributed. Toxicities were previously reported. Median survival rates were 11.4, 13.6, and 12.3 months for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (log rank p = 0.05, Wilcoxon p = 0.04). Survivals were 20, 31, and 24% at 2 years, and 4, 11, and 9% at 4 years in the STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT groups, respectively. There were no differences in local tumor control rates among the treatments. Patterns of first failure showed less distant metastasis (DM) (other than brain) for CT + RT compared to the RT alone arms (p = 0.04). Within squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), DM (other than brain) rates were 43%, 16%, and 38% in SCC for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (p = 0.0015). Patients with peripheral/chest wall lesions were significantly more likely to fail first in the thorax when treated on STD RT compared to CT + RT and HFX RT (p = 0.009). Survival rates were similar among the treatment arms for patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Among patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma, failure patterns did not differ by treatment group, but survival was significantly better in those who were treated by induction chemotherapy (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma treated on the CT + RT arm had a significant reduction of first DM other than brain, but there was difference in survival. Survival favored CT + RT in nonsquamous carcinoma despite similar failure patterns. Reasons for improved survival with CT + RT in NSCLC are not yet available.

Androgen suppression plus radiation versus radiation alone for patients with D1 (pN+) adenocarcinoma of the prostate (results based on a national prospective randomized trial, RTOG 85-31). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of immediate androgen suppression in conjunction with standard external beam irradiation vs. radiation alone on a group of pathologically staged lymph node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A national prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-31) of standard external beam irradiation plus immediate androgen suppression vs. external beam irradiation alone was initiated in 1985 for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. One hundred seventy-three of the patients in this trial had biopsy-proven pathologically involved lymph nodes. Ninety-eight of these patients received radiation plus the immediate androgen suppression (LHRH agonist), while 75 received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation instituted at the time of relapse. RESULTS: With a median followup of 4.9 years, estimated progression-free survival with PSA < 1.5 ng/ml at 5 years was 55% for the patients who received radiation plus immediate LHRH agonist vs. 11% of the patients who received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation at relapse (p = 0.0001). Because all of these patients had locally advanced disease (i.e., pathologically positive lymph nodes), stage does not explain this difference in outcome, and Gleason grade was not statistically different between the two groups. Estimated absolute survival at 5 years for the radiation and LHRH group was 73 vs. 65% for the radiation alone group who received androgen suppression at relapse. Estimated disease-specific survival at 5 years was 82% for the radiation and immediate LHRH agonist group and 77% for the radiation-alone group. CONCLUSION: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate and pathologically involved pelvic lymph nodes (pN+ or clinical stage D1) should be seriously considered for external beam irradiation plus immediate hormonal manipulation over radiation alone with hormonal manipulation at the time of relapse.

Recursive partitioning analysis of 1592 patients on four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group studies in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Survival outcome of 1592 analyzable patients on four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) studies in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer were studied utilizing a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). This approach creates a regression tree according to prognostic variables which partitions into homogenous subsets according to survival. Four protocols, RTOG 83-11, 83-21, 84-03 and 84-07 were analyzed. 83-11 and 84-07 were studies utilizing irradiation with alterfractionation; 83-21 and 84-03 were studies evaluating thymocin with irradiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation with thoracic irradiation respectively. Nine pretreatment variables and one treatment variable were analyzed. Adjustment for radiotherapy effect was made in the accelerated treatment protocol (84-07). Overall, median survival for the entire group was 9.0 months with 17% alive at 2 years. Univariate analysis suggests that KPS, < or = 70 vs. 80-100, pleural effusion, weight loss, < or = 5% vs. 5%, age, 60+ vs. < 60, T stage (T1 and T2 vs. T3 and T4) and N stage (N- vs. N+) were important prognastic factors. Radiation dose, sex, race and histology were not univariate prognastic factors. RPA identified KPS as the most significant covariate (median survival 5.9 mos. < or = 70 vs. 9.9 mos. 80-100). Within KPS 80-100 other splits occurred for N stage, age, weight loss and radiation therapy dose. KPS < or = 70 split at pleural effusion only. The best overall RPA tree has four distinct classes with median survival times ranging from 3.3 to 12.6 months. The RPA classes were validated in an independent non-small cell lung cancer dataset. This analysis may allow more intelligent stratification and study-design for future RTOG trials in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.