Does early morphology provide additional selection power to blastocyst selection for transfer?

Routine early developmental parameters are widely used in IVF centres to evaluate embryo development and fresh single-blastocyst transfer currently seems superior to single-embryo transfer. Would early morphological parameters help to choose the single blastocyst to be transferred, thereby improving the chances of implantation and live birth rate? This prospective observational study analysed the individual outcomes of 2617 embryos from 511 IVF couples scheduled for a single-blastocyst transfer. Embryo and blastocyst scores were constructed. There was a clear relationship between the kinetics and morphology of blastocysts and further implantation and live birth rate. There was a limited predictive value of embryo score with regard to blastocyst development and growth kinetics. Implanted and non-implanted blastocysts showed similar embryo scores. Thus usual morphological parameters on days 1 and 2 seem to have no additional value in indicating the right blastocyst to transfer. Non-invasive approaches might be helpful to increase the chances of implantation in the future.

Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers.

BACKGROUND: Whether extended culture allowing selection of embryos with high development potential has any advantage over cleavage-stage embryo transfer remains a matter of debate. Among the currently unsolved questions, the cumulative delivery rate resulting from fresh and frozen embryo transfers needs to be taken into account in both strategies. The aim of our study was, therefore, to compare the efficacy of single embryo transfer either on Day 2 or on Day 5/6 combining fresh and frozen embryo transfers. METHODS: A prospective study including 478 couples assigned on a voluntary basis to undergo elective single embryo transfer (eSET, n = 243) on Day 2 or single blastocyst transfer (SBT, n = 235) on Day 5/6 was performed. The primary outcome measurement was the cumulative delivery rate including fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in both groups. RESULTS: The delivery rate per cycle following fresh embryo transfer was significantly higher in the SBT group compared with the eSET group (P < 0.01). Conversely, frozen embryo and/or blastocyst transfers tended to result in a higher number of deliveries in the eSET compared with the SBT group. Altogether, the cumulative delivery rate per couple, including fresh and frozen embryo transfers, was similar between the two groups (37.9% versus 34.2% in the SBT and eSET groups, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The observed cumulative delivery rates in this study do not allow us to take a position in favor of SBT or eSET. An improvement in blastocyst cryopreservation may change this attitude.

[Sequential assessment of individually cultured embryos in IVF]. / Suivi individuel des embryons en FIV.

OBJECTIVE: It is a challenge for IVF centers to propose a method to select the most viable embryo to transfer, thereby minimizing the risk of multiple births. In this study, a prospective investigation was made to determine if non-invasive developmental markers on day 1 combined to conventional evaluation on day 2 can predict in vitro blastocyst development. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 4190 individually cultured embryos from patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment at the Tours University Hospital Center from January 2002 to December 2004 were included. Individual embryos were cultured in sequential media in microdrops under mineral oil from j1 to j5/j6 allowing to record their sequential growth until the blastocyst stage. RESULTS: The results showed a significant positive relationship between pattern 0 zygote, early cleavage, 4 cells embryos with < 20% fragmentation on day 2 and the rate of blastocyst development on day 5 (P < 0.05). In our hands, zygote pattern does not bring additional benefit to better select embryo. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Zygote and early cleavage assessments on day 1, morphological appearance on day 2 are some other parameters related individually to blastocyst development on days 5 and 6. These parameters can be used collectively to establish a predictive in vitro sequential embryo assessment model for routine use in IVF clinics.

Efficacy of IVF using frozen donor semen in cases of previously failed DI cycles compared with tubal infertility: a cohort study.

A cohort follow-up study was designed to compare the efficacy of IVF using frozen donor semen (IVF-D) following previously failed DI cycles (unexplained female infertility) and direct IVF-D treatment because of tubal infertility (control group). The cohort comprised 189 couples initiating IVF-D after previously failed DI cycles (n = 126) or directly (n = 63). Couples were followed until completion (success or drop-out for personal or medical reasons). Live births and drop-out were expressed both as rate per cycle and crude cumulative rate. Characteristics of IVF-D cycles were similar between the two groups. Moreover, overall outcome was also similar in terms of crude cumulative live birth rate (54.0 versus 57.1% for failed DI cycles and tubal infertility groups respectively). This is the first report on crude cumulative live birth rate based on a cohort follow-up study in unexplained previously failed DI cycles and tubal infertility. Previously failed DI cycles did not impair the chances of achieving a successful pregnancy using IVF-D in this series. Slight oocyte dysfunction, which might underlie the failure of DI cycles, might be overcome using IVF-D.

Achievement of second parenthood in an ART programme using frozen donor semen: cohort follow-up.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the efficacy of a programme using frozen donor semen in a cohort of patients returning for treatment after previously conceiving through donor insemination (DI). METHODS: The cohort included 222 couples with secondary infertility (previous live birth) in one University Hospital Centre. The treatment sequence involved DI cycles until completion. Live births, drop-out for personal or medical reasons and recourse to IVF with donor semen (IVF-D) were recorded for all patients. Live births were expressed as both rate per cycle and crude cumulative rate. RESULTS: At the end of the DI cycles, 65% of couples in the cohort achieved second parenthood. Most of them (77%) succeeded after only four DI cycles. The majority of couples who stopped treatment did so for personal reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Patients involved in a second parenthood project belong to a 'selected' population. Management and counselling of such patients need to reconcile the early efficacy of DI cycles, the invasiveness of the IVF-D procedure and the availability of donor semen.