ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transition between hospital and ambulatory care is a delicate step involving several healthcare professionals and presenting a considerable risk of drug-related problems. OBJECTIVE: To investigate pharmaceutical interventions made on hospital discharge prescriptions by community pharmacists. METHOD: This observational, prospective study took place in 14 community pharmacies around a Swiss acute care hospital. We recruited patients with discharge prescriptions (minimum three drugs) from the internal medicine ward of the hospital. The main outcome measures were: number and type of pharmaceutical interventions made by community pharmacists, time spent on discharge prescriptions, number of medication changes during the transition of care. RESULTS: The study included 64 patients discharged from the hospital. Community pharmacists made a total of 439 interventions; a mean of 6.9 ± 3.5 (range 1-16) interventions per patient. All of the discharge prescriptions required pharmaceutical intervention, and 61 (95%) necessitated a telephone call to the patients' hospital physician for clarifications. The most frequent interventions were: confirming voluntary omission of a drug (31.7%), treatment substitution (20.5%), dose adjustment (16.9%), and substitution for reimbursement issues (8.8%). Roughly half (52%) of all discharge prescriptions required 10-20 min for pharmaceutical validation. The mean number of medication changes per patient was 16.4: 9.6 changes between hospital admission and discharge, 2.6 between hospital discharge and community pharmacy, and 4.2 between community pharmacy and a general practitioner's appointment. CONCLUSION: Hospital discharge prescriptions are complex and present a significant risk of medication errors. Community pharmacists play a key role in preventing and identifying drug-related problems.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the number of prescriptions for sedative drugs has increased significantly, as has their long-term use. Moreover, sedative use is frequently initiated during hospital stays. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe new prescriptions of sedative drugs during hospital stays and evaluate their maintenance as discharge medication. METHODS: This observational prospective study took place in an internal medicine ward of a Swiss hospital over a period of 3 months in 2014. Demographic (age, sex, diagnosis, comorbidities) and medication data [long-term use of sedative drugs, new regular or pro re nata ('as needed') prescriptions of sedative drugs, drug-related problems] were collected. Sedative medications included: benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, antihistamines, antidepressants, neuroleptics, herbal drugs, and clomethiazole. McNemar's test was used for comparison. RESULTS: Of 290 patients included, 212 (73%) were over 65 years old and 169 (58%) were women; 34% (n = 98) were using sedative drugs long term before their hospital stay, and 44% (n = 128) had a prescription for sedative drugs at discharge-a 10% increase (p < 0.05). Sedative drugs were newly prescribed to 37% (n = 108) of patients during their stay. Among these, 37% (n = 40) received a repeat prescription at discharge. Over half of the sedative drugs were prescribed within 24 h of admission. Drug-related problems were detected in 76% of new prescriptions, of which 90% were drug-drug interactions. CONCLUSION: This study showed that hospital stays increased the proportion of patients who were prescribed a sedative drug at discharge by 10% (absolute increase). These prescriptions may generate long-term use and expose patients to drug-related problems. Promoting alternative approaches for managing insomnia are recommended.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Continuity of care between hospitals and community pharmacies needs to be improved to ensure medication safety. This study aimed to evaluate whether a set of pharmaceutical interventions to prepare hospital discharge facilitates the transition of care. METHODS: This study took place in the internal medicine ward and in surrounding community pharmacies. The intervention group's patients underwent a set of pharmaceutical interventions during their hospital stay: medication reconciliation at admission, medication review, and discharge planning. The two groups were compared with regards to: number of community pharmacist interventions, time spent on discharge prescriptions, and number of treatment changes. RESULTS: Comparison between the groups showed a much lower (77% lower) number of community pharmacist interventions per discharge prescription in the intervention (n=54 patients) compared to the control group (n=64 patients): 6.9 versus 1.6 interventions, respectively (p<0.0001); less time working on discharge prescriptions; less interventions requiring a telephone call to a hospital physician. The number of medication changes at different steps was also significantly lower in the intervention group: 40% fewer (p<0.0001) changes between hospital admission and discharge, 66% fewer (p<0.0001) between hospital discharge and community pharmacy care, and 25% fewer (p=0.002) between community pharmacy care and care by a general practitioner. CONCLUSION: An intervention group underwent significantly fewer medication changes in subsequent steps in the transition of care after a set of interventions performed during their hospital stay. Community pharmacists had to perform fewer interventions on discharge prescriptions. Altogether, this improves continuity of care.
Subject(s)
Patient Discharge , Patient Transfer/standards , Pharmacies/standards , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Internal Medicine , Male , Medication Reconciliation , Middle Aged , Patient Admission , Pharmacists , Professional Role , SwitzerlandABSTRACT
"The vulnerable are those whose autonomy, dignity and integrity are capable of being threatened". Based on this ethical definition of vulnerability, four risk factors of vulnerability might be identified among elderly persons, and are described in this article: the functional limitation, the loss of autonomy, the social precariousness and the restriction of access to medical care. A clinical case of elderly abuse is presented to illustrate vulnerability. Finally, some recommendations to lower the risk of vulnerability in elderly persons are proposed.
