Rumination syndrome: Assessment of vagal tone during and after meals and during diaphragmatic breathing.

BACKGROUND: Pathophysiology of rumination syndrome (RS) is not well understood. Treatment with diaphragmatic breathing improves rumination syndrome. The aim of the study was to characterize vagal tone in patients with rumination syndrome during and after meals and during diaphragmatic breathing. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 10 healthy volunteers (HV) and 10 patients with RS. Subjects underwent measurement of vagal tone using heart rate variability. Vagal tone was measured during baseline, test meal and intervention (diaphragmatic (DiaB), slow deep (SlowDB), and normal breathing). Vagal tone was assessed using mean values of root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), and area under curves (AUC) were calculated for each period. We compared baseline RMSSD, the AUC and meal-induced discomfort scores between HV and RS. Furthermore, we assessed the effect of respiratory exercises on symptom scores, and number of rumination episodes. KEY RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline vagal tone between HV and RS. During the postprandial period, there was a trend to higher vagal tone in RS, but not significantly (P > .2 for all). RS had the higher total symptom scores than HV (P < .011). In RS, only DiaB decreased the number of rumination episodes during the intervention period (P = .028), while both DiaB and SlowDB increased vagal tone (P < .05 for both). The symptom scores with the 3 breathing exercises showed very similar trends. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Patients with RS do not have decreased vagal tone related to meals. DiaB reduced number of rumination events by a mechanism not related to changes in vagal tone.

Non-invasive diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in adult dyspeptic patients by stool antigen detection: does the rapid immunochromatography test provide a reliable alternative to conventional ELISA kits?

Stool antigen-testing allows non-invasive detection of Helicobacter pylori that is indicative of active infection. Three commercial kits are currently marketed in the UK for stool antigen-testing. The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative evaluation of the performances of each of these tests, compared with culture and histological examination of gastric biopsies, for pre-treatment diagnosis of infection in an adult dyspeptic population in south-east England. Examination of 112 stool samples by the Premier Platinum HpSA ELISA (Meridian Diagnostics) and by the Amplified IDEIA HpStAR ELISA (DakoCytomation) kits demonstrated that the latter was more sensitive (81.3 versus 93.8%, respectively) and specific (91.7 versus 100.0%, respectively). Additionally, the IDEIA HpStAR was easier to interpret, with OD readings of positive and negative results being far from the recommended cut-off, whereas equivocal results that were generated by the HpSA kit were difficult to interpret. Additional testing of 87 of the 112 stools by the ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA kit (Meridian Diagnostics) demonstrated that this test was easier to perform than ELISA and was more sensitive than the HpSA kit but, compared with the IDEIA HpStAR kit, the ImmunoCard test was less sensitive (87.8 versus 95.9%, respectively) and specific (89.4 versus 100.0%, respectively). Furthermore, the ImmunoCard test generated weakly positive results, correlating with lower OD readings for both ELISA kits, that were difficult to interpret. The Amplified IDEIA HpStAR kit is therefore the most sensitive and specific of the three tests that are available for pre-treatment, non-invasive detection of H. pylori in stool samples in an English adult dyspeptic population.