Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 165(1-4): 86-90, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25833898

ABSTRACT

Indication-based national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for a few most common paediatric computed tomography (CT) examinations are proposed. Patient dose data (CTDI vol and dose length product) were collected for over 1000 patients in 4 university hospitals with best experiences in paediatric CT. Four indications for chest CT and two for abdomen (abdomen + pelvis), chest + abdomen and head CT were considered. The DRLs for the body examinations are proposed as exponential DRL-curves, where CTDI vol and dose length product are presented as a function of patient weight. The same DRL curve applies to all the indications studied. The basic 75 % level curve is supplemented by 50 % level curve to enable considerations on varying levels of technology. For head CT, DRLs are proposed for a few age groups (1, 1-5, 5-10 and 10-15 y), separately for routine CT and CT for ventricular size. The proposed DRLs are generally lower than the few published DRLs in other countries.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Algorithms , Child , Finland , Hospitals , Humans , Pediatrics/standards , Radiometry/methods , Reference Values , Risk Assessment
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 147(1-2): 142-6, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21784731

ABSTRACT

Despite the fact that doses to paediatric patients from computed tomography (CT) examinations are of special concern, only few data or studies for setting of paediatric diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) have been published. In this study, doses to children were estimated from chest and head CT, in order to study the feasibility of DRLs for these examinations. It is shown that for the DRLs, patient dose data from different CT scanners should be collected in age or weight groups, possibly for different indications. For practical reasons, the DRLs for paediatric chest CT should be given as a continuous DRL curve as a function of patient weight. For paediatric head CT, DRLs for a few age groups could be given. The users of the DRLs should be aware of the calibration phantom applied in the console calibration for different paediatric scanning protocols. The feasibility of DRLs should be re-evaluated every 2-3 y.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Thoracic/standards , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Feasibility Studies , Head/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Reference Standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...