Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16: 243, 2016 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27255755

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although N95 filtering facepiece respirators and medical masks are commonly used for protection against respiratory infections in healthcare settings, more clinical evidence is needed to understand the optimal settings and exposure circumstances for healthcare personnel to use these devices. A lack of clinically germane research has led to equivocal, and occasionally conflicting, healthcare respiratory protection recommendations from public health organizations, professional societies, and experts. METHODS: The Respiratory Protection Effectiveness Clinical Trial (ResPECT) is a prospective comparison of respiratory protective equipment to be conducted at multiple U.S. study sites. Healthcare personnel who work in outpatient settings will be cluster-randomized to wear N95 respirators or medical masks for protection against infections during respiratory virus season. Outcome measures will include laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections, acute respiratory illness, and influenza-like illness. Participant exposures to patients, coworkers, and others with symptoms and signs of respiratory infection, both within and beyond the workplace, will be recorded in daily diaries. Adherence to study protocols will be monitored by the study team. DISCUSSION: ResPECT is designed to better understand the extent to which N95s and MMs reduce clinical illness among healthcare personnel. A fully successful study would produce clinically relevant results that help clinician-leaders make reasoned decisions about protection of healthcare personnel against occupationally acquired respiratory infections and prevention of spread within healthcare systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01249625 (11/29/2010).


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Masks , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Respiratory Protective Devices , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Virus Diseases/prevention & control , Ambulatory Care , Female , Humans , Prospective Studies , Workplace
2.
Curr Environ Health Rep ; 2(3): 226-35, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26231500

ABSTRACT

Preventing transmission of emerging infectious diseases remains a challenge for infection prevention and occupational safety programs. The recent Ebola and measles outbreaks highlight the need for pre-epidemic planning, early identification, and appropriate isolation of infected individuals and health care personnel protection. To optimally allocate limited infection control resources, careful consideration of major modes of transmission, the relative infectiousness of the agent, and severity of the pathogen-specific disease are considered. A framework to strategically approach pathogens proposed for health care settings includes generic principles (1) elimination of potential exposure, (2) implementation of administrative controls, (3) facilitation of engineering and environmental controls, and (4) protection of the health care worker and patient using hand hygiene and personal protective equipment. Additional considerations are pre-epidemic vaccination and incremental costs and benefits of infection prevention interventions. Here, major strategies for preventing health-care-associated transmissions are reviewed, including reducing exposure; vaccination; administrative, engineering, and environmental controls; and personal protective equipment. Examples from recent outbreaks are used to highlight key infection prevention aspects and controversies.


Subject(s)
Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Global Health , Hand Hygiene , Health Personnel/standards , Humans , Occupational Health , Personal Protective Equipment , Program Evaluation , Vaccination
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 36(3): 336-45, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25695176

ABSTRACT

Healthcare personnel often find themselves on the frontlines of any epidemic, and may be at particularly high risk of acquiring respiratory viral illnesses when compared to the general population. Many aspects dictate how respiratory viruses spread both inside the hospital and out: Elements to consider include the specific type of virus being targeted for prevention, as well as environmental conditions and host factors, such as age and immune status. Due to the diverse nature of these agents, multiple modes of transmission, including contact, droplet, aerosol, and transocular, must be considered when designing an effective infection prevention program. In this review, we examine the data behind current theories of respiratory virus transmission and key elements of any respiratory illness prevention program. We also highlight other influences that may come into play, such as the cost-effectiveness of choosing one respiratory protection strategy over another.


Subject(s)
Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Virus Diseases/prevention & control , Hand Hygiene , Humans , Personal Protective Equipment , Respiratory Tract Infections/transmission , Virus Diseases/transmission
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...