Protocol for a pilot and feasibility randomized-controlled trial of four weeks of oral γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) intake and its effect on pain and sleep in middle-to-older aged adults.

Approximately 1.71 billion people globally live with musculoskeletal pain conditions, including low back pain, knee pain, and neck pain Cieza et al. (2020). In the US, an estimated 20.4% of U.S. adult had chronic pain and 8.0% of U.S. adults had high-impact chronic pain, with higher prevalence associated with advancing age Dahlhamer et al. (2018). On the other hand, between 50 and 70 million US adults have a sleep disorder (American Sleep Association). Although the link between sleep and pain is widely established, the neurobiological mechanisms underlying this relationship have yet to be fully elucidated, specifically within an aged population. As currently available sleep and chronic pain therapies are only partially effective, novel treatment approaches are urgently needed. Given the potential mechanistic role of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in both conditions, and the availability of GABA supplements over the counter, the present proposal will determine the feasibility and acceptability of oral GABA administration in middle-to-older aged adults with chronic pain and sleep disorders as well as characterize the potential neurobiological mechanisms involved in both conditions. Results from the present investigation using a parallel, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study will provide novel preliminary information needed for future translational pain and sleep research.

Color difference between the vita classical shade guide and composite veneers using the dual-layer technique.

Background: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the color difference between the Vita Classical Shade Guide and composite veneers using the dual-layer technique. Material and Methods: Thirty samples were fabricated using a custom-made mold (Easy Layering Shade Guide Kit, 3M) using two resin composites: Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M); and Estelite Omega (Tokuyama) (n=3). The composite veneers were made by layering the different enamel and body or dentin shades from each composite. The color measurements were taken using a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade V®, Vita Zahnfabrik). The ΔE00 between the Vita Classical Shade Guide (Vita Zahnfabrik) and the composite veneers were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula. Results: For the composite veneers using Filtek Supreme Ultra, the best match for A1 Vita shade was achieved layering either EA1 with DA2 or DA3; EA2 with DA1 or DA2 (ΔE00= 1.53 ~ 1.96 ± 0.4). For A2 Vita shade the best match would be EA3 with DA3 or EA3 with DA2 (ΔE00= 1.40 ~ 1.85 ± 0.1); or for A3 Vita shade the best match would be EA3 with DA2 2.50±(0.6). For the composite veneers using Estelite Omega, the were no best match for neither A1, A2 or A3 Vita shade (ΔE00> 2.5). Conclusions: The combination of enamel and dentin shades from Filtek Supreme Ultra provided acceptable color match for A1, A2 and A3 shades from the Vita Shade Guide, while Estelite Omega did not provide acceptable color match for any of the Vita Shade Guide standard shades tested. Key words:Color, color matching, optical properties, resin composite, layering.