Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
S Afr J Sports Med ; 32(1): v32i1a8456, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36818989

ABSTRACT

Background: Growing evidence highlights that elite rugby union players experience poor sleep quality and quantity which can be detrimental for performance. Objectives: This study aimed to i) compare objective sleep measures of rugby union players between age categories over a one week period, and ii) compare self-reported measures of sleep to wristwatch actigraphy as the criterion. Methods: Two hundred and fifty-three nights of sleep were recorded from 38 players representing four different age groups (i.e. under 16, under 18, senior academy, elite senior) in a professional rugby union club in the United Kingdom (UK). Linear mixed models and magnitude-based decisions were used for analysis. Results: The analysis of sleep schedules showed that U16 players went to bed and woke up later than their older counterparts (small differences). In general, players obtained seven hours of sleep per night, with trivial or unclear differences between age groups. The validity analysis highlighted a large relationship between objective and subjective sleep measures for bedtime (r = 0.56 [0.48 to 0.63]), and get up time (r = 0.70 [0.63 to 0.75]). A large standardised typical error (1.50 [1.23 to 1.88]) was observed for total sleep time. Conclusion: This study highlights that differences exist in sleep schedules between rugby union players in different age categories that should be considered when planning training. Additionally, self-reported measures overestimated sleep parameters. Coaches should consider these results to optimise sleep habits of their players and should be careful with self-reported sleep measures.

2.
J Urol ; 154(3): 968-70; discussion 970-1, 1995 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7637103

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A prospective study was performed to determine the incidence of multifocal renal cell carcinoma in patients who are candidates for partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative imaging studies and surgical specimens in 44 patients suitable for partial nephrectomy but undergoing radical nephrectomy were prospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Of 44 renal cell cancers 11 (25%) demonstrated pathological multifocality, while 10 of 11 multifocal tumors (91%) occurred in the face of a primary tumor 5 cm. or smaller. Tumor multifocality was independent of the size of the primary renal tumor but occurred with a slightly higher frequency in tumors of stage T3A or greater even if the primary tumor was small. CONCLUSIONS: Partial nephrectomy in patients with unilateral renal cancer should be approached with caution and should not be performed simply because it is technically feasible.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Nephrectomy/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...