Is It Necessary to Wake Patients for Overnight Vital Signs Following Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Benefits of sleep are well-established in postoperative recovery; however, patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) often experience poor sleep during hospitalization. While multifactorial, among the major reasons are the frequent and ritualized overnight vital sign checks. In the absence of data in support of or against this practice, we asked whether it remains necessary. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 419 primary TJA patients. Demographics, comorbidities, operative, and vital sign data were collected through postoperative Day 3. Correlation between daytime (6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and nighttime (10:01 p.m. to 5:59 a.m.) vitals was examined. The vast majority of nighttime vitals fell within normal ranges, including O2 saturation (O2; 99.4%), temperature (TEMP; 97.8%), heart rate (HR; 87.5%), systolic blood pressure (SBP; 85.8%), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP; 84.4%). Predictors of abnormal nighttime vitals included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (abnormal SBP; odds ratio [OR] 1.64, p = .045), obesity (abnormal DBP; OR: 0.37, p = .011), and smoking status (elevated temperature; OR: 2.79, p = .042). Estimated blood loss was predictive of an abnormal nighttime TEMP (OR: 1.002; p < .001). Postoperatively, there were several correlations between abnormal daytime and nighttime vitals, including SBP (OR: 6.23, p < .001), DBP (OR: 4.31, p < .001), and HR (OR: 10.35; p < .001). Of the 419 patients, only 9 (2.1%) received any intervention based on abnormal nighttime vitals. Each exhibited daytime vital sign abnormalities prior to the abnormal nighttime readings. Patients with abnormal nighttime vitals can be predicted on the basis of medical comorbidities and abnormal daytime vitals. These findings suggest that healthy post-TJA patients with normal daytime vitals may not need to be routinely woken at night.

Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Versus Freehand Pedicle Screw Placement After One-to Three-Level Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients undergoing one-to three-level lumbar fusion using robotically assisted vs freehand pedicle screw placement. METHODS: Patients who underwent either robotically assisted or freehand pedicle screw placement for one-to three-level lumbar fusion surgery from January 1, 2014 to August 31, 2020 at a single academic institution were identified. Propensity score matching was performed based on demographic variables. Clinical and surgical outcomes were compared between groups. Recovery Ratios (RR) and the proportion of patients achieving the minimally clinically important difference (%MCID) were calculated for Oswestry Disability Index, PCS-12, MCS-12, VAS Back, and VAS Leg at 1 year. Surgical outcomes included complication and revision rates. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients were included in the study (85 robotic and 177 freehand). No significant differences were found in ΔPROM scores, RR, or MCID between patients who underwent robotically assisted vs freehand screw placement. The rates of revision (1.70% freehand vs 1.18% robotic, P = 1.000) and complications (.57% freehand vs 1.18% robotic, P = .546) were not found to be statically different between the 2 groups. Controlling for demographic factors, procedure type (robotic vs freehand) did not emerge as a significant predictor of ΔPROM scores on multivariate linear regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Robotically assisted pedicle screw placement did not result in significantly improved clinical or surgical outcomes compared to conventional freehand screw placement for patients undergoing one-to three-level lumbar fusion.

A narrative review of infection prevention techniques in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery.

Spinal infections associated with pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgery are associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality along with elevated health-care costs. Prevention requires meticulous technique by the spine surgeon throughout the perioperative period. There is significant variability in the current practices of spinal deformity surgeons with regard to infection prevention, stemming from the lack of reliable evidence available in the literature. There has also been a lack of literature detailing the difference in infection rates and risk factors between pediatric and adult patients undergoing deformity correction surgery. In this narrative review we looked at 60 studies in the adult population and 9 studies in the pediatric population. Most of these studies of surgical site infections (SSI) in spinal deformity surgery have been performed in adult patients, however it is clear that the pediatric neuromuscular patient requires particular attention that we discuss in detail. This narrative review of the literature outlines evidence and compares and contrasts data for preventive strategies and modifiable risk factors to decrease rates of SSI in the pediatric and adult spinal deformity patient populations. In this review we discuss techniques relating to preoperative cleansing protocols, antibiotic administration, gentle soft tissue handling, appropriate closure, drain usage, and intraoperative technique itself to minimize EBL and operative time.

The Use of Robotics Coupled With Navigation for Pediatric Congenital Spine Deformity.

Background: Spinal instrumentation in children with congenital spine deformity poses challenges to the surgeon, given the small patient size and the anomalous anatomy often encountered. Purpose: We aimed to investigate the accuracy of screw placement when robotics coupled with real-time navigation was used for surgical treatment of pediatric congenital spine deformity at 1 institution. Methods: We conducted a retrospective search of our institution's database for all patients younger than 18 years of age with congenital spine deformity who were treated with the robotics surgical platform coupled with navigation between June 2019 and December 2020. We recorded data on demographics, location and type of anomaly, procedure performed, and intraoperative variables related to robotics and navigation. We reviewed the images of patients who had intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging or postoperative computed tomographic scans to determine the accuracy of screw placement using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Results: In 14 patients identified, a total of 95 screws were attempted, with 94 successfully placed using robotics coupled with navigation. There were no noted screw-related complications (neurologic or visceral) and no return to the operating room for screw malposition. Conclusion: Patients with congenital spine deformity present potentially unique challenges due to variant anatomy. This retrospective series suggests that robotics coupled with navigation for congenital spine deformity correction in the pediatric population may aid in accurate screw placement and reduce complication rates. More rigorous study is warranted.

Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly Has a Low Conversion Rate.

BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty (HA) has been a mainstay treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures for many years. The purpose of this study was to report the conversion rate of HA to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced femoral neck fractures and compare outcomes between implant constructs (bipolar vs unipolar), fixation options (cemented vs cementless stems), and age groups (<75 years vs ≥75 years). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of a consecutive cohort of 686 patients who underwent HA for the treatment of femoral neck fractures at our institution between 1999 and 2013 with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The overall component revision rate, including conversion to THA, revision HA, revision with open reduction internal fixation, and Girdlestone procedure, was 5.6% (39/686). Seventeen patients (2.5%) were converted from HA to THA at an average of 1.9 years after index procedure. A significantly lower conversion rate of 1.4% (7/499 patients) was found in the older patient cohort (≥75 years old) compared to 5.3% (11/187) in the younger cohort. The most common causes for conversion surgery to THA were acetabular wear (5 patients), aseptic loosening (4 patients), and periprosthetic fracture (3 patients). There was a significantly lower rate of periprosthetic fracture (0.4% vs 2.5%, P value .025) in the cemented implant group compared to the cementless group. We observed a higher rate of dislocations in the bipolar vs unipolar group (3.8% vs 1%, P value .02) and no other significant differences between these groups. CONCLUSION: We observed a low reoperation rate for this cohort of patients, relatively higher conversion rates for the younger population, fewer periprosthetic fractures with the use of cemented stems, and no advantage of bipolar over unipolar prostheses.