A patient centered assessment of the 2016 ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria: evaluating the meaningfulness of response.

OBJECTIVES: The ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria (Total Improvement Score [TIS]) is a composite measure calculated using changes in myositis core set measures. It is unclear if achieving improvement per TIS reflects improvement in any symptoms of myositis patients. In this study, we examined the association between achieving TIS improvement and patient-centered outcome measures (PCOMs). METHODS: Adults with myositis were enrolled in a prospective study with baseline and 6-month visits. Six core set measures were collected at each visit along with the following PCOMs: Fatigue (visual analogue scale [VAS] and short form 36 [SF36]), pain (VAS, SF36), health-related quality of life (SF-36), physical function (PROMIS-physical function, SF36, sit-to-stand, timed up-and-go, and six-min walk) and physical activity (actigraphy). Mann-Whitney U was used to compare PCOMs between improvement groups. Spearman correlation and regression models were used for correlation and association between TIS and PCOMs, respectively. RESULTS: Of 50 patients (six polymyositis, 24 dermatomyositis, 9 necrotizing myopathy, 11 anti-synthetase syndrome) enrolled (mean age: 52, 60% female), 21 patients satisfied the TIS improvement criteria at 6-months. PCOMs including fatigue, pain, quality of life, physical activity and physical function demonstrated significantly greater improvement in patients who had minimal TIS improvement compared with those with no improvement. Greater PCOM improvements were seen with moderate-major TIS improvement. TIS correlated moderately-strongly with most PCOMs. CONCLUSION: Achieving improvement criteria was accompanied by significant clinical improvements in fatigue, pain, health-related quality of life, physical function, and physical activity. These results support the use of TIS as a clinically meaningful metric of improvement.

Collaborative research in myositis-related disorders: MIHRA, a global shared community model.

Myositis International Health and Research Collaborative Alliance (MIHRA) is a newly formed purpose-built non-profit charitable research organization dedicated to accelerating international clinical trial readiness, global professional and lay education, career development and rare disease advocacy in IIM-related disorders. In its long form, the name expresses the community's scope of engagement and intent. In its abbreviation, MIHRA, conveys linguistic roots across many languages, that reflects the IIM community's spirit with meanings such as kindness, community, goodness, and peace. MIHRA unites the global multi-disciplinary community of adult and pediatric healthcare professionals, researchers, patient advisors and networks focused on conducting research in and providing care for pediatric and adult IIM-related disorders to ultimately find a cure. MIHRA serves as a resourced platform for collaborative efforts in investigator-initiated projects, consensus guidelines for IIM assessment and treatment, and IIM-specific career development through connecting research networks.MIHRA's infrastructure, mission, programming and operations are designed to address challenges unique to rare disease communities and aspires to contribute toward transformative models of rare disease research such as global expansion and inclusivity, utilization of community resources, streamlining ethics and data-sharing policies to facilitate collaborative research. Herein, summarises MIHRA operational cores, missions, vision, programming and provision of community resources to sustain, accelerate and grow global collaborative research in myositis-related disorders.

Performance of the 2017 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups: a scoping review.

The 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for adult/juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) were established using a data-driven approach by an international group of myositis experts to allow classification of IIM and its major subtypes. Since their publication, the performance of the criteria has been tested in multiple cohorts worldwide and significant limitations have been identified. Moreover, the understanding and classification of IIM have evolved since 2017. This scoping review was undertaken as part of a large international project to revise the EULAR/ACR criteria and aims to i) summarise the evidence from the current literature on the performance characteristics of the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria in various cohorts and IIM subtypes, and ii) delineate the factors that need to be considered in the revision of the classification criteria. A systematic search of Medline (via PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and conference abstract archives was conducted independently by three investigators for studies on the EULAR/ACR criteria published between October 2017 and January 2023. This scoping review of 19 articles and 13 abstracts revealed overall good performance characteristics of the EULAR/ACR criteria for IIM, yet deficiencies in lack of inclusion of certain IIM subtypes, such as immune mediated necrotising myopathy, amyopathic dermatomyositis, antisynthetase syndrome and overlap myositis. Published modifications that may improve the performance characteristics of the criteria for classification of IIM subtypes were also summarised. The results of this review suggest that a revision of the EULAR/ACR criteria is warranted.

Evolving and evaluating the OMERACT fellows program: insights and implications from OMERACT 2023 fellows.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the evolution of the OMERACT Fellows Program (OM FP) and to evaluate the innovative changes implemented in the 2023 program. METHODS: The OM FP, the first of its kind in global rheumatology, was developed in 2000 to mentor early career researchers in methods and processes for reaching evidence-driven consensus for outcome measures in clinical studies. The OM FP has evolved through continuing iterations of face to face and online feedback. Key new features delivered in 2023 included e-learning modules, virtual introductory pre-meetings, increased networking with Patient Research Partners (PRPs), learning opportunities to give and receive personal feedback, ongoing performance feedback during the meeting from Fellow peers, PRPs, senior OMERACTers (members of the OMERACT community) and Emerging Leader mentors, involvement in pitching promotions, two-minute Lightning Talks in a plenary session and an embedded poster tour. An online survey was distributed after the meeting to evaluate the program. RESULTS: OM FP has included 208 fellows from 16 countries across 4 continents covering 47 different aspects of rheumatology outcomes since its inception. Over 50 % have remained engaged with OMERACT work. In 2023, 18 Fellows attended and 15 (83 %) completed the post-meeting survey. A dedicated OM FP was deemed important by all respondents, and 93 % would attend the meeting in future. The PRP/Fellow Connection Carousel and Lightning Talks were rated exceptional by 93 %. Key components to improve included clarification of expectations, overall workload, the Emerging Leaders Mentoring Program, and the content and duration of daily summary sessions. CONCLUSION: The innovations in the 2023 OM FP were well received by the majority of participants and supports early career rheumatology researchers to develop collaborations, skills and expertise in outcome measurement. Implementation of feedback from Fellows will enhance the program for future meetings, continuing to facilitate learning and succession planning within OMERACT.

Current myositis clinical trials and tribulations.

With improved understanding of disease pathogenesis and availability of outcome measures, there has been a remarkable increase in the number of therapeutic clinical trials in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (myositis) over the last three years reaching as many as five trials per site. These trials share similar design and inclusion/exclusion criteria resulting in a competitive clinical trial landscape in myositis. While these are exciting times for the myositis field, we have a number of concerns about the design and conduct of the myositis trials. These include competitive landscape, lengthy placebo arms, underrepresentation of minority groups among participants, use of patient reported outcome measures with limited/no data on validity in myositis, antiquated disease classification criteria, and unclear performance of the ACR/EULAR Myositis Response Criteria in skin-predominant patients despite inclusion of these patients in trials. In this viewpoint, we further discuss these concerns and offer potential solutions such as including patient perspectives in the trial design and adoption of innovative frameworks.

Serum cytokine profiles of adults with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of available biomarkers of disease activity in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), and serum cytokines/chemokines hold potential as candidate biomarkers. We aimed to determine serum cytokine profiles of IIM patients with active disease as compared to patients in remission and healthy controls. METHODS: The IIM patients with active disease (included patients enrolled in repository corticotropin injection trial), in remission, and healthy controls were enrolled in this cross-sectional observational study. Serum concentrations of 51 cytokines/chemokines were obtained by utilising a bead-based multiplex cytokine assay (Luminex®). The myositis core set measures were obtained for all the patients. Cytokines with the best predictive ability to differentiate these clinical groups were assessed with three methods: 1) Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator modelling, 2) stepwise approach, and 3) logistic regression model. RESULTS: Twenty-one IIM patients with active disease, 11 IIM patients in remission and 10 healthy controls were enrolled. Myositis patients had elevated levels of chemokines that attract eosinophils (eotaxin) and dendritic cells, NK cells, cytotoxic T-cells and monocytes/macrophages (CXCL-9, IP-10), cytokines that drive T-helper 1 responses (TNF-a, lymphotoxin-a), matrix degrading enzymes (MMP-3 and -9), and IGFBP-2 compared to healthy controls. Myositis patients with active disease had higher levels of lymphotoxin-a, CXCL-9, MIP-1a, MIP-1b and MMP-3 than patients in remission. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated differences in cytokine profiles of IIM patients (active and inactive disease) compared to healthy controls and identified some cytokines that could potentially be used as biomarkers. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to validate our findings.

Correlation between B cell epitope profile and clinical features of anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive (MDA5+) dermatomyositis patients exhibit a variety of clinical features. We therefore investigated whether patterns of B cell epitope recognition are linked to the clinical course of MDA5+ dermatomyositis. METHODS: Our cross-sectional study used ELISA-based methods to determine the relationship between antibody recognition of overlapping 155 amino acid MDA5 subfragments and clinical features of 24 MDA5+ myositis patients. Correlations between clinical features and standardized anti-MDA5 subfragment antibody titers were assessed via Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Twenty-four MDA5+ patients submitted serum samples within a median of 0 (interquartile range, 0-74) days from the initial clinic visit. In addition to typical dermatomyositis rashes, these patients exhibited muscle symptoms (n = 11), vascular dysfunction (n = 9), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) (n = 16). Female patients exhibited higher titers of antibodies recognizing fragment H (aa 905-1026) compared to male patients. Muscle involvement was associated with higher levels of anti-fragment F (aa 646-801) antibody. Conversely, patients with vascular abnormalities had higher anti-fragment B (aa 130-284) and E (aa 517-671) antibody titers than those without vascular dysfunction. Four patients died due to ILD progression and showed higher anti-fragment A (aa 1-155) antibody titers than the other 20 patients. Differences in the ratio of anti-fragment to anti-full length MDA5 antibody titers were found for sex (H: anti-MDA5) and vascular dysfunction (anti-fragment B, E: anti-MDA5). CONCLUSIONS: Various clinical features of MDA5+ dermatomyositis correlated with levels of antibodies targeting selected subfragments of this autoantigen, providing a link between fragment-specific immune responses and disease course.

Discordance between patient- and physician-reported disease activity in adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.

OBJECTIVES: Patient-reported global disease activity (patient-global) is a myositis core set measure. Understanding the drivers of patient-global is important in patient assessment, and disagreements between physician and patient perception of disease activity may negatively impact shared decision making. We examined the determinants of patient-global and discordance between patient-global and physician-reported global disease activity (physician-global) in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). METHODS: Adults with IIM were enrolled in a prospective observational cross-sectional study. The following myositis outcome measures were collected: patient-global, physician-global, extramuscular and muscle disease activity, manual muscle testing, HAQ, creatine kinase, fatigue, pain, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function, 36-item Short Form, sit to stand, timed up and go, 6-minute walk and Actigraph steps/min/day count. A linear regression model was used to determine the contribution of each measure to patient-global. Discordance was defined as ≥3 points difference between patient-global and physician-global. RESULTS: Fifty patients [60% females; mean age 51.6 years (s.d. 14.9)] with probable/definite IIM (EULAR/ACR classification criteria for IIM) were enrolled. Physical function and fatigue measures contributed to patient-global the most, followed by measures of pain, physical activity, quality of life and muscle disease, while physician-global was primarily driven by muscle disease activity. Patient-global was discordant with physician-global in 30% of the patients, of which patient-global was higher than physician-global in 66%. Pain, fatigue and physical activity contributed more to patient-global than physician-global. CONCLUSION: Fatigue, pain and physical activity are important driving factors of the differences observed in the patient vs physician assessment of myositis disease activity. Understanding the gap between patient and physician perspectives may help provide better patient-centred care.

A single center pilot study: assessing resident needs and faculty perceptions to improve training in rheumatology.

BACKGROUND: Internal medicine (IM) residents lack confidence in rheumatology. Due to the wide variety of topics in rheumatology, identifying the most important subjects to learn during training is vital to create future interventions to increase confidence and knowledge. The preferred teaching modality for both attendings/fellows and residents is not known. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to all IM residents, rheumatology fellows, and rheumatology faculty at the University of Chicago during the 2020-2021 academic year. Residents reported self-confidence levels on 10 rheumatology topics, while rheumatology attendings/fellows were asked to rank these from most to least important to learn during IM residency. All groups were asked preferred teaching modality. RESULTS: Median confidence level [interquartile range] among residents for caring for patients with rheumatological conditions was 6 [3.6-7.5] for inpatient and 5 [3.7-6.5] for outpatient settings (10 being very confident). Attendings and fellows identified the most important topics to learn during the rheumatology rotation as ordering and interpreting autoimmune serologies and musculoskeletal exam. Both attendings/fellows and residents preferred bedside teaching in the inpatient setting and case-based learning in the outpatient setting. CONCLUSIONS: While some disease-specific topics such as autoimmune serologies were identified as important rheumatology topics for IM residents to learn, more practical topics like musculoskeletal exam skills were also deemed important. This highlights the need for comprehensive interventions that focus on more than standardized exam topics alone to improve rheumatology confidence in IM residents. There are different preferences of teaching styles in various clinical settings.

Performance of the 2016 ACR-EULAR myositis response criteria in juvenile dermatomyositis therapeutic trials and consensus profiles.

OBJECTIVES: The 2016 ACR-EULAR Response Criteria for JDM was developed as a composite measure with differential weights of six core set measures (CSMs) to calculate a Total Improvement Score (TIS). We assessed the contribution of each CSM, representation of muscle-related and patient-reported CSMs towards improvement, and frequency of CSM worsening across myositis response criteria (MRC) categories in validation of MRC. METHODS: Data from JDM patients in the Rituximab in Myositis trial (n = 48), PRINTO JDM trial (n = 139), and consensus patient profiles (n = 273) were included. Observed vs expected CSM contributions were compared using Sign test. Characteristics of MRC categories were compared by Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni adjustment. Spearman correlation of changes in TIS and individual CSMs were examined. Agreement between physician-assessed change and MRC categories was evaluated by weighted Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Of 457 JDM patients with IMACS CSMs and 380 with PRINTO CSMs, 9-13% had minimal, 19-23% had moderate and 41-50% had major improvement. The number of improved and absolute percentage change of CSMs increased by MRC improvement level. Patients with minimal improvement by MRC had a median of 0-1 CSM worsened, and those with moderate/major improvement had a median of zero worsening CSMs. Of patients improved by MRC, 94-95% had improvement in muscle strength and 93-95% had improvement in ≥1 patient-reported CSM. IMACS and PRINTO CSMs performed similarly. Physician-rated change and MRC improvement categories had moderate-to-substantial agreement (Kappa 0.5-0.7). CONCLUSION: The ACR-EULAR MRC perform consistently across multiple studies, supporting its further use as an efficacy end point in JDM trials.

Performance of the 2016 ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria in adult dermatomyositis/polymyositis therapeutic trials and consensus profiles.

OBJECTIVE: The ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria (MRC) were developed as a composite measure using absolute percentage change in six core set measures (CSMs). We aimed to further validate the MRC by assessing the contribution of each CSM, frequency of strength vs extramuscular activity improvement, representation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), and frequency of CSM worsening. METHODS: Data from adult dermatomyositis/polymyositis patients in the rituximab (n = 147), etanercept (n = 14), and abatacept (n = 19) trials, and consensus patient profiles (n = 232) were evaluated. The Total Improvement Score (TIS), number of improving vs worsening CSMs, frequency of improvement with and without muscle-related CSMs, and contribution of PROM were evaluated by MRC category. Regression analysis was performed to assess contribution of each CSM to the MRC. RESULTS: Of 412 adults with dermatomyositis/polymyositis, there were 37%, 24%, 25%, and 14% with no, minimal, moderate, and major MRC improvement, respectively. The number of improving CSMs and absolute percentage change in all CSMs increased by improvement category. In minimal-moderate improvement, only physician-reported disease activity contributed significantly more than expected by MRC. Of patients with at least minimal improvement, 95% had improvement in muscle-related measures and a majority (84%) had improvement in PROM. Patients with minimal improvement had worsening in a median of 1 CSM, and most patients with moderate-major improvement had no worsening CSMs. Physician assessment of change generally agreed with MRC improvement categories. CONCLUSION: The ACR-EULAR MRC performs consistently across multiple studies, further supporting its use as an efficacy end point in future myositis therapeutic trials.

RheumMadness: Creating an Online Community of Inquiry in Rheumatology.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the educational impact of RheumMadness, an online tournament of rheumatology concepts grounded in social constructivist theory, as viewed through the community of inquiry (CoI) framework. METHODS: The curricular scaffold of RheumMadness was a bracket of 16 rheumatology concepts competing as "teams" in a tournament. Participants could create and review "scouting reports" about each team, listen to a RheumMadness podcast, discuss on social media, and submit a bracket predicting tournament outcomes according to the perceived importance of each team. Engagement was measured with direct analytics and through self-report on a survey. The survey also assessed participants' educational experience using an adapted 34-item CoI survey, which describes the cognitive, social, and teaching presences in a learning activity. RESULTS: One hundred brackets were submitted. On average, each scouting report was viewed 92 times, each podcast episode was downloaded 163 times, and 486 tweets were sent about #RheumMadness from 105 users. The survey received 58 of 107 responses (54%). Respondent agreement with prompts related to each CoI presence was: 70.3% cognitive, 61.7% social, 84.9% teaching. Reported engagement in RheumMadness correlated strongly with overall CoI survey scores (r = 0.72, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: RheumMadness created an online CoI that fostered social constructivist learning about rheumatology.

Reliability and validity of PROMIS physical function, pain interference, and fatigue as patient reported outcome measures in adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: International study from the OMERACT myositis working group.

OBJECTIVE: Pain interference, fatigue, and impaired physical function are common features of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). The objective of this study was to evaluate the construct validity and test-retest reliability of the Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference 6av1.0, Fatigue 7av1.0, and Physical Function 8bv2.0 instruments. METHODS: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were deployed to adult IIM patients from OMERACT Myositis Working Group (MWG) international clinic sites via two online surveys (2019, 2021). Internal consistency of each PROM was analyzed by Cronbach's α. Construct validity was determined by a priori hypotheses generated by the MWG with >75% agreement for each hypothesis and calculated with Pearson correlations. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient with PROMIS instruments administered at time zero and 7 days. RESULTS: Surveys were sent to 368 participants in total; participants who completed each questionnaire varied (n=65 to 263). For construct validity, 10 out of 13 a priori hypotheses were met supporting construct validity of PROMIS instruments (Pain Interference 3/4, fatigue 4/4, and Physical Function 3/5). Test-retest reliability was strong for all PROMIS instruments. All PROMIS instruments demonstrated excellent internal consistency. None of the measures demonstrated any ceiling or floor effects except for a ceiling effect in the Pain Interference instrument. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents test-retest reliability and construct validity evidence supporting PROMIS Pain Interference (6a v1.0), Fatigue (7a v1.0), and Physical Function (8b v2.0) using a large international cohort of patients with IIM. Internal consistency of these instruments was excellent. A ceiling effect was noted in the Pain Interference instrument.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Myositis: A Distinct Form of Inflammatory Myopathy.

ABSTRACT: Research on the relationship between inflammatory myopathy and malignancy has grown considerably within the last century. Now, the burgeoning field of inflammatory myopathy has yet another player in the mix: immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myositis (ICI myositis). Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myositis is indicated by clinical diagnosis of inflammatory myopathy after initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor for cancer management. Current literature reflects low prevalence but high mortality associated with ICI myositis, especially when involving myasthenia gravis and myocarditis. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myositis tends to have muscle pain along with weakness, infrequent presentation with dermatitis, or interstitial lung disease and is typically seronegative with scattered, endomysial inflammatory infiltrates on biopsy. The differential diagnosis of ICI myositis includes myasthenia gravis and other neurological immune-related adverse events. Therapeutic approach involves high doses of corticosteroids with a choice of steroid-sparing immunomodulating agent(s) that is primarily driven by expert opinion due to lack of robust research to support one agent over another. There is wide variation in the inclusion criteria for ICI myositis used in previous studies. We review previously used inclusion criteria and suggest an expertise-based classification criterion to provide a standardized definition and allow comparability between studies. There is a critical need for prospective translational and clinical studies that elucidate the pathophysiology of ICI myositis in order to improve evaluation and management of these patients.

Glucocorticoids in Myositis: Initiation, Tapering, and Discontinuation.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: We discuss the evidence behind the use of glucocorticoids in myositis including a discussion of mechanism of action, dosing, tapering, and duration of therapy as well as glucocorticoid-related adverse events that are particularly important in myositis patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies showing reduction in mortality rates after the use of glucocorticoids, better outcomes in patients treated with glucocorticoids compared to those who did not, and reduction of inflammation in muscle biopsies provide low level evidence to support use of glucocorticoids in myositis. Early initiation of therapy is associated with better functional outcomes. Use of intravenous methylprednisolone in patients with severe disease may lead to quicker recovery and reduction in long-term glucocorticoid exposure. Steroid-related myopathy and osteoporosis are glucocorticoid side effects that are particularly relevant in myositis. The optimal dose and duration of glucocorticoid therapy in myositis currently remain elusive, and this review emphasizes the need for better quality studies in this area.