Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 7(10): 1639-45, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22798540

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many patients with ESRD, particularly minorities and women, face barriers in completing the steps required to obtain a transplant. These eight sequential steps are as follows: medical suitability, interest in transplant, referral to a transplant center, first visit to center, transplant workup, successful candidate, waiting list or identify living donor, and receive transplant. This study sought to determine the effect of navigators on completion of steps. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Cluster randomized, controlled trial at 23 Ohio hemodialysis facilities. One hundred sixty-seven patients were recruited between January 2009 and August 2009 and were followed for up to 24 months or until study end in February 2011. Trained kidney transplant recipients met monthly with intervention participants (n=92), determined their step in the transplant process, and provided tailored information and assistance in completing the step. Control participants (n=75) continued to receive usual care. The primary outcome was the number of transplant process steps completed. RESULTS: Starting step did not significantly differ between the two groups. By the end of the trial, intervention participants completed more than twice as many steps as control participants (3.5 versus 1.6 steps; difference, 1.9 steps; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.5 steps). The effect of the intervention on step completion was similar across race and sex subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of trained transplant recipients as navigators resulted in increased completion of transplant process steps.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Navigation , Peer Group , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Donor Selection , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Linear Models , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Ohio , Patient Dropouts , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Selection , Referral and Consultation , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Waiting Lists , Young Adult
2.
JAMA ; 301(6): 629-35, 2009 Feb 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19211470

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: High dietary phosphorus intake has deleterious consequences for renal patients and is possibly harmful for the general public as well. To prevent hyperphosphatemia, patients with end-stage renal disease limit their intake of foods that are naturally high in phosphorus. However, phosphorus-containing additives are increasingly being added to processed and fast foods. The effect of such additives on serum phosphorus levels is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of limiting the intake of phosphorus-containing food additives on serum phosphorus levels among patients with end-stage renal disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cluster randomized controlled trial at 14 long-term hemodialysis facilities in northeast Ohio. Two hundred seventy-nine patients with elevated baseline serum phosphorus levels (>5.5 mg/dL) were recruited between May and October 2007. Two shifts at each of 12 large facilities and 1 shift at each of 2 small facilities were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. INTERVENTION: Intervention participants (n=145) received education on avoiding foods with phosphorus additives when purchasing groceries or visiting fast food restaurants. Control participants (n=134) continued to receive usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in serum phosphorus level after 3 months. RESULTS: At baseline, there was no significant difference in serum phosphorus levels between the 2 groups. After 3 months, the decline in serum phosphorus levels was 0.6 mg/dL larger among intervention vs control participants (95% confidence interval, -1.0 to -0.1 mg/dL). Intervention participants also had statistically significant increases in reading ingredient lists (P<.001) and nutrition facts labels (P = .04) but no significant increase in food knowledge scores (P = .13). CONCLUSION: Educating end-stage renal disease patients to avoid phosphorus-containing food additives resulted in modest improvements in hyperphosphatemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00583570.


Subject(s)
Food Additives , Hyperphosphatemia/prevention & control , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Patient Education as Topic , Adult , Aged , Diet , Female , Food Additives/adverse effects , Humans , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Phosphorus/blood , Renal Dialysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...