[The higher level of anxiety as a significant risk factor in evaluating health and social self-feeling in students of medical university].

The success of adaptation of students to conditions of educational process in Medical University is determined by complex of accompanying socio-psychological factors. The level of personal anxiety determines severity of impact of these factors on psychosomatic state of student. The high level of anxiety among students in conditions of educating in Medical University can significantly and multi-componently impact their physical organism, success in teaching and social well-being. The purpose of the study is to determine prevalence of high levels of anxiety and their impact on health and social well-being of students of different genders, periods of study on budgetary and commercial basis. There is significant prevalence of high levels of personal anxiety among students of first year of education (57.0%), which tends to increase by fourth year (75.5%). The increased anxiety has significant impact on morbidity (correlation with anxiety levels τ=0.69 and τ=0.40 for men and women, respectively) and social well-being of students, their behavior and lifestyle. The female students are the most affected by anxiety factor. The belonging of students with high level of anxiety to budget or commercial group determines specificity their response to conditions of education in the Medical University. The obtained results should be used to improve efficiency of adaptation and psychological support of students in the process of education in Medical University. The high level of anxiety in students should be taken into account in preventive activities of preserving health of students as separate factor, impacting similarly with strong health risk factor on their physical organism and social well-being, considering gender and period of study on budgetary or commercial basis.

[The population health in The Russian Federation and the Republic of Uzbekistan: a comparative analysis].

The epidemiological monitoring of morbidity, mortality and disability is one of the important mechanisms of studying population health. The purpose of the study is to carry out comparative analysis of health status of population of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Uzbekistan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The demographic indicators as well as indicators of morbidity, mortality and disability of adult population of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Uzbekistan in 2010-2020 were analyzed. The statistical, analytical and mathematical methods were applied. The statistical significance of differences in relative values was calculated using the Student's coefficient and was considered as significant at p<0.05 and t>2. THE RESULTS: During the study period, an increase in population size of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Uzbekistan was established. The population age structure was of regressive type in the Russian Federation and of progressive type in Uzbekistan. In the Russian Federation, significant decrease of natality up to 12.8% and statistically significant increase of mortality up to 34% occurred. The natural population loss in the Russian Federation raised three-fold. In the Republic of Uzbekistan, there was statistically significant increase both of natality and mortality indicators up to 11% and of positive values of natural population growth by 14% (p<0.03). In the Russian Federation, there is statistically significant (p<0.006) decrease of indicator of primary disability from 7.7 cases per 1000 of population in 2010 to 5.6 cases in 2020. In the Republic of Uzbekistan, significant increase (p<0.009) of indicators of primary disability from 0.1 cases per 1000 of population to 2.2 cases per 1000 of population was established. THE CONCLUSION: The different types of population in the Russian Federation (regressive) and in the Republic of Uzbekistan (progressive) predetermine differences in demographic indicators of both countries. The high level of mortality and increasing of morbidity of circulatory system and neoplasms in both countries justify need in improving measures of primary and secondary prevention at the state level.