Necrotizing Fasciitis and Diabetic Foot: Results of a Prompt Identification, Surgery and Antibiotic Therapy (P.I.S.A.) Protocol.

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rapidly progressive, life-threatening infection, involving the skin, soft tissue and fascia. We evaluated outcomes of its surgical management in diabetic foot (DF) patients in a tertiary referral centre. We retrospectively searched for NF in the database of our DF Section from 2016 to 2018. All cases were treated according to a multiprofessional integrated protocol, with Prompt Identification, Surgical debridement and systemic Antibiotic therapy (P.I.S.A. Protocol). We analysed short-term evolution (surgical procedures and major amputations), and long-term outcomes (survival and healing rates). Sixty-eight patients were referred to our DF clinic for suspicion of NF. The diagnosis was confirmed in 54 (79.4%; male/female 40/14; type 1/2 diabetes 6/48; age 62.8 ± 8.1 years; duration of diabetes 13.6 ± 10.1 years). According to the microbiological results, cases were classified as Type 1 (33-61.2%), 2 (7-12.9%) and 3 (14-25.9%). No significant differences were observed. All patients underwent a decompressive fasciotomy. Six patients (11.1%) required also a forefoot amputation and 12 (22.2%) a toe or ray amputation. No major amputation was performed in the short-term period. During the follow-up (26 ± 12 months) 46 patients (85%) healed in 94 ± 11 days. Of the remaining 8: 5 (9.2%) died for other reasons before healing, 2 (3.7%) recurred and one (1.9%) required a major amputation. Our experience reveals a relatively high prevalence of NF in DF; despite this, we observed how, when promptly and aggressively treated, NF has a good prognosis and it is not associated with an excess of limb loss and deaths.

Postoperative pain management in non-traumatic emergency general surgery: WSES-GAIS-SIAARTI-AAST guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Non-traumatic emergency general surgery involves a heterogeneous population that may present with several underlying diseases. Timeous emergency surgical treatment should be supplemented with high-quality perioperative care, ideally performed by multidisciplinary teams trained to identify and handle complex postoperative courses. Uncontrolled or poorly controlled acute postoperative pain may result in significant complications. While pain management after elective surgery has been standardized in perioperative pathways, the traditional perioperative treatment of patients undergoing emergency surgery is often a haphazard practice. The present recommended pain management guidelines are for pain management after non-traumatic emergency surgical intervention. It is meant to provide clinicians a list of indications to prescribe the optimal analgesics even in the absence of a multidisciplinary pain team. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An international expert panel discussed the different issues in subsequent rounds. Four international recognized scientific societies: World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Global Alliance for Infection in Surgery (GAIS), Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia Intensive Care (SIAARTI), and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), endorsed the project and approved the final manuscript. CONCLUSION: Dealing with acute postoperative pain in the emergency abdominal surgery setting is complex, requires special attention, and should be multidisciplinary. Several tools are available, and their combination is mandatory whenever is possible. Analgesic approach to the various situations and conditions should be patient based and tailored according to procedure, pathology, age, response, and available expertise. A better understanding of the patho-mechanisms of postoperative pain for short- and long-term outcomes is necessary to improve prophylactic and treatment strategies.