Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Tumori ; 108(2): 177-181, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33885350

ABSTRACT

Lombardy has represented the Italian and European epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Although most clinical efforts within hospitals were diverted towards the care of virally infected patients, therapies for patients with cancer, including radiotherapy (RT), have continued. During both the first and second pandemic waves, several national and regional organizations provided Italian and Lombardian RT departments with detailed guidelines aimed at ensuring safe treatments during the pandemic. The spread of infection among patients and personnel was limited by adopting strict measures, including triage procedures, interpersonal distance, and adequate implementation of personal protective equipment (PPE). Screening procedures addressed to both the healthcare workforce and patients, such as periodic nasopharyngeal swabs, have allowed the early identification of asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic COVID-19 cases, thus reducing the spread of the infection. Prevention of infection was deemed of paramount importance to protect both patients and personnel and to ensure the availability of a minimum number of staff members to maintain clinical activity. The choice of treating COVID-19-positive patients has represented a matter of debate, and the risk of oncologic progression has been weighted against the risk of infection of personnel and other patients. Such risk was minimized by creating dedicated paths, reserving time slots, applying intensified cleaning procedures, and supplying personnel and staff with appropriate PPE. Remote working of research staff, medical physicists, and, in some cases, radiation oncologists has prevented overcrowding of shared spaces, reducing infection spread.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Radiation Oncology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Med Oncol ; 37(11): 108, 2020 Nov 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33150476

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Italy experienced one of the world's severest COVID-19 outbreak, with Lombardy being the most afflicted region. However, the imposed safety measures allowed to flatten the epidemic curve and hence to ease the restrictions and inaugurate, on the 4th of May 2020, the Italian phase (P) 2 of the pandemic. The present survey study, endorsed by CODRAL and AIRO-L, aimed to assess how radiotherapy (RT) departments in Lombardy have dealt with the recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire dealing with the management of pandemic was developed online and sent to all CODRAL Directors on the 10th of June 2020. Answers were collected in full anonymity one week after. RESULTS: All the 33 contacted RT facilities (100%) responded to the survey. Despite the scale of the pandemic, during P1 14 (42.4%) centres managed to safely continue the activity (≤ 10% reduction). During P2, 10 (30.3%) centres fully recovered and 14 (42.4%) reported an increase. Nonetheless, 6 (18.2%) declared no changes and, interestingly, 3 (9.1%) reduced activities. Overall, 21 centres (63.6%) reported suspected or positive cases within healthcare workforce since the beginning of the pandemic. Staff units were quarantined in 19 (57.6%) and 6 (18.2%) centres throughout P1 and P2, respectively. In the two phases, about two thirds centres registered positive or suspected cases amongst patients. CONCLUSION: The study revealed a particular attention to anti-contagion measures and a return to normal or even higher clinical workload in most RT centres in Lombardy, necessary to carry out current and previously deferred treatments.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Oncology Service, Hospital/trends , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Health Personnel/trends , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment/trends , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Tumori ; 104(5): 352-360, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29986637

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:: Several efforts are being implemented at the European level to measure provision of up-to-date radiation treatments across the continent. METHODS:: A snapshot survey involving all radiation oncology centers within Lombardy, Italy, was performed in 2012 and repeated in 2014 and 2016, in cooperation with regional governmental officers. Centers were asked to provide detailed information concerning all individual patients being treated on the index day, and to report data on available local resources. RESULTS:: We observed an increase in the number of centers and of megavoltage units (MVU) (from 76 to 87, i.e., 8.7 MVU per million inhabitants in 2016). Mean number of MVU per center was 2.5. Average age of MVU increased from 5.3 to 7.5 years and patients on the waiting list also increased. Conformal 3D radiotherapy (RT) treatments decreased from 56% to 42% and were progressively replaced by intensity-modulated RT treatments (from 39% to 49%). Waiting times were overall satisfactory. Radiation oncologists treated on average 152 and radiation therapists 100 RT courses per year. Average reimbursement per course was €4,879 (range €2,476-€8,014). CONCLUSIONS:: The methodology of snapshot survey proved feasible and provided valuable information about radiation oncology provision and accessibility in Lombardy.


Subject(s)
Health Resources/standards , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Radiation Oncology/instrumentation , Radiation Oncology/organization & administration , Humans , Needs Assessment , Radiation Oncology/methods , Radiotherapy, Conformal/instrumentation , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/instrumentation , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Radiother Oncol ; 117(2): 315-21, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26347495

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of brain metastases (BM) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is extremely poor, but the incidence is increasing. The performance of existing prognostic classifications such as recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and graded prognostic assessment (GPA) has never been evaluated in this specific setting. Moreover, the development of nomograms for estimating survival in such patients could be extremely helpful for treating physicians. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2013, data from 227 patients with BM from CRC were collected at 8 Italian institutions. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and statistical comparison between curves was performed using the log-rank test. The discriminative ability for OS of RPA and GPA was assessed by the Harrell C-index from univariable Cox models. Putative prognostic factors for OS were also studied by multivariable Cox analysis, using the Harrell C index to evaluate the model discriminative ability. After a backward variable selection, a nomogram was developed to predict median survival time from individual patient- and tumor-related characteristics. The nomogram was externally validated on an independent series. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 59 months, fifty percent of patients were still at risk at 5 months. The C index was 0.594 and 0.607 for the RPA and GPA classifications, respectively. The C-index associated with the final multivariable Cox model used for developing the nomogram was 0.643; the favorable prognostic factors for survival were lower age (p=0.061), better Karnofsky performance status (p<0.001), supratentorial site of BM (p<0.001), and lower number of BM (p=0.035). The C index evaluated on the validation series was 0.733, even better than in the development series; also, the calibration of nomogram predictions was good. CONCLUSION: The C-index associated to the nomogram model was slightly higher than that obtained for the RPA and GPA classifications. Most importantly, the very satisfactory results of nomogram validation on the external series, make us confident that our instrument may assist in prognostic assessment, treatment decision making, and enrollment into clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Nomograms , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Italy , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models
5.
Curr Opin Investig Drugs ; 4(2): 186-91, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12669380

ABSTRACT

A type of non-acute pulmonary aspergilloses, defined as 'semi-invasive' and 'chronic necrotizing aspergillosis', respectively, was described by Geffer, and later by Binder in the 1980s. Subsequently, a terminological uncertainty prevailed, favored by a preference in choosing the predisposing diseases. The simple term 'chronic pulmonary aspergillosis', as well as a classification based on the pulmonary anatomy, is proposed in this review. The most significant Medline and Embase indexed papers published between 1966 and the present day, including coverage of classification, diagnosis and treatment of aspergillosis are analyzed. In addition, an open study, carried out on 23 patients treated with terbinafine is reported. The results obtained suggest the need for further randomized studies.


Subject(s)
Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary/classification , Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary/therapy , Animals , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary/diagnosis , Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary/drug therapy , Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary/microbiology , Chronic Disease , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Naphthalenes/therapeutic use , Terbinafine , Terminology as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...