Novel therapeutics for the treatment of familial Mediterranean fever: from colchicine to biologics.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), an inherited autosomal recessive disorder, is characterized by sporadic, paroxysmal attacks of fever and serosal inflammation, lasting 1-3 days. Patients may develop renal amyloidosis, arthritis, serositis, and skin and oral lesions. Diagnosis is based on clinical features, response to treatment with colchicine, and genetic analysis. Colchicine prevents attacks and renal amyloidosis, in addition to reversing proteinuria. Nonresponders may receive novel therapy, including interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonists and IL-1 decoy receptor. Recently, new options have been considered.

Triple therapies plus different probiotics for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

The Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) cure rate following standard triple therapies is decreasing worldwide. Therefore, further approaches aimed to improve standard triple therapy efficacy should be attempted. This prospective, pilot study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic role of either Lactobacillus reuteri (L. reuteri) or a high concentration of probiotics in addition to standard triple therapies for H. pylori eradication. The study enrolled 65 consecutive dyspeptic patients with H. pylori infection. All patients underwent upper endoscopy with gastric biopsies. Patients were assigned to receive one of the following therapies: (a) standard 7-day triple; (b) the same 7-day triple therapy plus L. reuteri supplementation; (c) the same 7-day triple therapy plus a probiotic mixture; and d) a 14-day standard triple therapy plus a probiotic mixture. H. pylori eradication was checked by using a 13C-urea breath test performed 4-6 weeks after treatment. No therapy regimen achieved > 80% eradication rate at both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses. Although the 14-day therapy plus a probiotic mixture tended to achieve higher eradication rate (71%), no statistically significant difference emerged among the different therapy regimens tested (range: 53-71%). The lowest incidence of side-effects was observed following the 7-day therapy plus L. reuteri (6%) and highest with the 14-day triple therapy plus probiotic mixture (33%), although the difference failed to reach the statistically significance. In conclusion, our data found that 7-14 days triple therapy with or without probiotic supplementation failed to achieved acceptable H. pylori eradication rates.

Helicobacter pylori eradication with either quadruple regimen with lactoferrin or levofloxacin-based triple therapy: a multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rate following standard triple therapy is decreasing worldwide. A quadruple therapy with lactoferrin and a levofloxacin-based triple therapy has been found to achieve a very high (>90%) cure rate. This study aimed to confirm these encouraging results. METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, randomised, multicentre, Italian study enrolling consecutive H. pylori infected patients. The infection at entry was assessed by endoscopy and biopsies (histology plus rapid urease test) in all patients, whilst bacterial eradication was assessed by 13C-urea breath test 4-6 weeks after therapy ended. Patients were randomised to receive either a 7-day, triple therapy with rabeprazole 20mg o.d., levofloxacin 500 mg o.d., and amoxycillin 1g b.i.d. (4 tablets/day) or a 7-day quadruple therapy comprising of rabeprazole 20mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, tinidazole 500 mg plus bovine lactoferrin 200mg, all given twice daily (10 tablets/day). RESULTS: Overall, 144 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. Following the triple therapy, H. pylori infection was cured in 49 out of 72 (68.1%; 95% CI=57-79) patients and in 49 out of 71 (69.1%; 95% CI=58-80) at intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. Following the quadruple regimen, the infection was cured in 52 out of 72 (72.2%; 95% CI=62-83) and in 52 out of 68 (76.5; 95% CI=66-87) patients at intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. No statistically significant difference emerged between the two therapy regimens. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication rate following both quadruple therapy with lactoferrin and a low-dose PPI, triple therapy with levofloxacin is disappointingly low.

Endoscopic follow-up after colorectal cancer resection: an Italian multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic follow-up is advised in patients operated for colorectal cancer due to a high risk for both metachronous colorectal cancer and adenomas. Such issue has been scarcely addressed in Italy. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of neoplastic lesions at a scheduled endoscopic follow-up and to identify the patients at higher risk of recurrence. METHODS: Colorectal cancer patients diagnosed in the three participating hospitals (one North, one Centre and one South Italy) were scheduled for colonoscopies at 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery. Incidence of adenomas, advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer was assessed in all patients. Neoplastic incidence in patients with and without synchronous lesions at entry was also compared. RESULTS: Overall, 318 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled including 108 (34%, group A) with a synchronous lesion and 210 (group B) without it. A cumulative neoplastic incidence of 20.1, 32.4 and 44% was observed at 1, 3 and 5 years of follow-up, respectively. The cumulative incidence of all the lesions was 70% in group A and 30.2% in group B at 5-year follow-up, being 39.5 and 15.5% after excluding the lesions detected at 1-year examination. A neoplastic lesion was detected more frequently in group A at 1year (30.5% versus 14.7%; p = 0.0013), 3 years (21.4% versus 7.6%; p = 0.0008) and at 5years (18.1% versus 7.8%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that the incidence of adenomas in patients operated for colorectal cancer is fairly high. Colorectal cancer patients with synchronous lesions are at higher risk of neoplastic recurrence at follow-up as compared to those without them.

Quadruple therapy with lactoferrin for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomised, multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rate with standard triple therapies is decreasing. Recently, lactoferrin administration has been shown to significantly increase the cure rate of 7-day rabeprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole triple therapy. We assessed whether lactoferrin also increases the eradication rate of 7-day esomeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin triple therapy as first-line treatment. METHODS: Overall, 133 consecutive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomised to receive either a standard 7-day triple therapy with esomeprazole 20mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. and amoxycillin 1g b.i.d. (68 patients) or a quadruple therapy comprising of the same regimen plus lactoferrin 200mg b.i.d. (65 patients). H. pylori at entry was assessed by endoscopy, while bacterial eradication was checked by (13)C urea breath test 4-6 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication following standard triple therapy was achieved in 53/68 (77.9%; 95% CI = 68-88) and in 53/66 (80.3%; 95% CI = 71-89) patients at ITT and PP analyses, respectively. Following the quadruple regimen, the infection was cured in 50/65 (76.9%; 95% CI = 67-87) and 50/64 (78.1%; 95% CI = 68-88) patients at ITT and PP analyses, respectively. No statistically significant difference emerged between the two therapeutic regimens, both at ITT (p = 0.9) and PP analyses (p = 0.9). Side effects were complained by seven (10.3%) patients and six (9.2%) patients following the triple and quadruple regimens, respectively (p = 0.9), with only one patient in the quadruple group interrupting the treatment due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Quadruple therapy with lactoferrin did not significantly increase the H. pylori cure rate of standard 7-day clarithromycin-amoxycillin based triple therapy in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients.

Sequential treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients: improving the cost of pharmacotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that Helicobacter pylori eradication rates with standard 7-day triple therapy are unsatisfactory. A novel 10-day sequential treatment regimen recently achieved a significantly higher eradication rate. To improve the pharmacotherapeutic cost, we evaluated whether an acceptable eradication rate could be achieved in peptic ulcer patients by halving the dose of clarithromycin. METHODS: In a prospective, open-label study, 152 duodenal ulcer patients with H. pylori infection, assessed by rapid urease test and histology, were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either a 10-day sequential treatment comprising rabeprazole 20 mg b.d. plus amoxicillin 1 g b.d. for the first 5 days, followed by rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d. for the remaining 5 days (high-dose therapy), or a similar schedule with the clarithromycin doses halved to 250 mg b.d. (low-dose therapy). No further antisecretory drugs were offered. Four to six weeks after therapy, H. pylori eradication and ulcer healing rates were assessed by endoscopy. RESULTS: Similar H. pylori eradication rates were observed following high- and low-dose regimens for both per protocol (97.3% vs. 95.9%; P = N.S.) and intention-to-treat (94.7% vs. 92.2%; P = N.S.) analyses. No major side-effects were reported. At repeat endoscopy, peptic ulcer healing was observed in 93% and 93% of patients following high- and low-dose therapy, respectively. CONCLUSION: The cheaper low-dose sequential regimen may be suggested for H. pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients, even without continued proton pump inhibitor therapy after eradication treatment.

[The role of Doppler echocardiography in assessing left ventricular diastolic function. Case histories]. / Ruolo dell'ecocardiografia Doppler nella valutazione della funzione diastolica ventricolare sinistra. Contributo casistico.

The aim of this study was to provide a further contribution to evaluate the alterations induced by age on a number of simple Doppler indexes of left ventricular diastolic function. A population of 48 healthy subjects aged between 15 and 78 years old was examined using pulsed Doppler analysis of the left ventricular refilling flow. Linear regression analysis revealed a significant inverse correlation between age and peak speed during rapid refilling (r = -0.80); between age and the ratio between peak speed during rapid refilling and peak during atrial systole (r = -0.92); between age and deceleration time of peak E wave speed, although on the contrary the peak speed of diastolic refilling flow during the atrial systole (r = 0.81) increased significantly with age. Variance analysis showed that indexes of left ventricular diastolic function and age continued on the contrary to be significant n the population as a whole and in both sexes. From these findings it is clear that in the different age groups (15-29, 30-49, 50-65, and over 65) the peak speed of rapid refilling flow was significantly lower in over-65-year-olds than in elderly, middle-aged and young subjects (55 +/- 0.8, 60 +/- 0.5, 65 +/- 0.7 and 75 +/- 0.6 respectively; p < 0.001). The ratio between the peak speed of rapid refilling and that during the atrial systole was lower in over-65-year-olds compared to elderly subjects, middle-aged subjects or the youngest age group (0.94 +/- 0.09, 1.05 +/- 0.13, 1.96 +/- 0.21 and 2.68 +/- 0.50 respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amlodipine versus nifedipine retard in the treatment of chronic ischemic heart disease.

The efficacy of amlodipine, a long half-life dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, at the dosage of 5-10 mg/day in a single daily administration, has been compared with that of nifedipine R, a short half-life dihydropyridine, at the dosage of 20-40 mg b.i.d. in 29 patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. After a one week placebo period, patients were assigned to the treatment with amlodipine or nifedipine R, according to a randomized sequence and a cross-over, single-blind design, for two control periods of four weeks and without a wash-out interval between these two phases. During the stress test, a significant increase from baseline in test duration and in time to onset of ischemia and of angina have been obtained with both treatments; moreover amlodipine increased significantly the time to onset of ST segment deviation (-1 mm) and the time to maximum ST segment deviation compared with nifedipine R changes. Also with Holter monitoring and in the angina diary there was a significant reduction of anginal episodes. As regards safety profile, amlodipine treatment was associated with a significantly lower incidence of side effects compared with nifedipine R. This is probably due to the particular pharmacokinetics of amlodipine which, besides the long half-life which allows a single daily administration, shows a retarded peak (between the 6th and the 12th hour) with consequent reduction of phenomena connected with fast and excessive peripheral vasodilatation. In conclusion, amlodipine was as effective in reducing the signs of ischemia as nifedipine R, but compliance was better due to the single daily administration and so was tolerability.

[Multiparameter analysis of the ergometric test. Significance of the failure of systolic blood pressure to decrease during recovery phase as an index of coronary disease]. / Analisi poliparametrica del test ergometrico. Significato del mancato decremento della pressione arteriosa sistolica in fase di recupero come indice di coronaropatia.

Ergometric tests were performed in 27 patients who had previously undergone coronarography following instrumental findings and/or symptoms which seemed highly indicative of ischemic cardiopathy. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic importance of the failure of systolic blood pressure to decrease during the third minute of the recovery phase of the test as an index of coronary disease. In particular, as reported by other studies, the ratio between systolic blood pressure at the third minute of recovery and maximum systolic blood pressure during the test was also assessed values above 0.7 were considered pathological. Sixteen out the 27 patients examined showed lesions which were hemodynamically significant, whereas 11 patients were free of lesions and 9 had previous myocardial necrosis. The level of the above ratio in subjects without significant coronary lesions was 0.66 +/- 0.05, whereas it was 0.85 +/- 0.04 (p less than 0.01) in patients with coronary disease. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative prognostic values were respectively 91.6%, 62%, 64.7% and 90.9%. In patients with lesions to the three main arteries both the sensitivity and the specificity were 100%. In the same patients, the ST criteria were 85.7%, 50%, 81.8% and 74.3%.